Therefore, instead of having different distinct cultures, all forms are blended into one. Even though individuals living in America receive several benefits, they lose a sense of their identity. The sense of assimilation partially imposes indigenous people to learn about the characteristics among the majority group. This may include: new genres of music, religion, certain laws, or practices that might be new to a diverse cultural society. Multiculturalism may play a valuable role in retaining one’s traditional roots, but in the end, the price ethnic individuals have to pay is learning new forms of beliefs and customs.
Throughout history, migrants had to meet a specific standard of living, particularly satisfying the means of society, in this case, assimilation. However, throughout time, assimilation developed numerous critiques which allowed integration to overtake this basis. Assimilation, according to the straight line classic assimilation theory, is the ongoing fact that individuals need to assimilate into the receiving country to a core culture of white Anglo Protestant, which will allow them for uncomplicated movement. Under these circumstances, assimilation is unidirectional. On the other hand, integration states that assimilation is not necessary for manageable movement in the receiving country.
Take pride that even though the rest of the world may disagree, you still believe it to be a beautiful place.” When Iain S. Thomas said this, he may have not been referring to assimilation, but that is one interpretation someone could get from this quote. When the world around you tries to force assimilation it can cause negative feelings and problems. Assimilation is when someone changes something about themselves to fit an ideal society has set out to be the norm. Even in the United States we see people trying to create problems out of people not assimilating. Whether it be Mexicans not speaking English in the states or someone’s clothing not matching the normality of the other people around them, they are not the problem.
The French colonial masters made them to work and think like French men. However, with the development of spirit of nationalism, and the laws on human rights, seeking a rise in confidence and cultural dignity of minorities, the policy of assimilation was banned. Then, leading to what is now called integration today. Farley (1982) argues, “There is no doubt that the dominant norm in the United States through nearly all our history has been cultural assimilation. That is, the prevailing cultural group in the United States has been the so-called WASPs: White Anglo Saxon Protestants.
Research Paper Assimilation is a processes of integration or adaptation to a group, for example, how minority groups get integrate into the dominant groups. In the United States, assimilation into American culture is a big part of the way to success, and to achieve the long-awaited American dream. As a result of American assimilation, people start to speak the same language and to live a life considered part of society, then it begins to have better economic opportunities and better daily life opportunities. These states of assimilation have decreased since the United States has become a multicultural country; people from different cultures are no longer attracted to the American culture. Many Hispanics immigrate to United States With the
Milton Gordon is stating in Assimilation in American: Theory and Reality that assimilation can happen in a linear fashion with the end goal is for the minority to become like the majority. In America that means becoming protestant and middle-class and adopting Anglo culture while forgetting their own ethnic culture. This was blatant with the forcing of Americanization onto minorities during World War I. Many non-white eastern and southern Europeans were allowed to become white by essentially forgetting the culture and adopting that of America. This lead to the melting pot theory where cultures were blended together in a strong cohesive society and that the process would beneficial would be good for all involved.
Assimilation and multiculturalism The socioeconomic inclusion of female refugees is shaped by the integration model that is adopted by the host country. Scholars distinguish between multiculturalism and assimilation as the main models of immigrant integration. Assimilation, on the one hand, means that the process through which a migrant absorb completely the host country’s culture and identity (Joppke, 2007). Assimilation can occur spontaneously or forcibly when a country forces a migrant to erase their original culture, language and religion in order to replace them with the host country’s culture and identity. However, Brubaker (2001) narrows down the definition of assimilation to include the integration programmes that make non-EU immigrants become more similar to the native population.
Cultural encounters occur in a society that has been over crowded with people from different countries due to migration, war, economic recession. The most important part has been played by colonization because of which people from different cultures has flocked Europe and America. Due to which most of the European countries have become a home of immense variety of minority cultures. The reason to this is because when certain group of people settles in a new culture they try to adopt it and also attracts the host nation to adopt a bit of theirs. We can see many multicultural societies in Britain, France, and Belgium etc.
By being forced to comply with the cultural norm of the country you are being denied of the opportunity to explore your own culture. Not being allowed such a vital part of your identity might lead to a lack of self-understanding. It is extremely important to be able to explore one’s culture, to know what you subscribe to and what you do not. That way you figure out whether you identify with the culture or not, thus creating your own sense of cultural identity. Identity development is highly important, and being stripped of it creates an abundant number of problems.
Assimilation is not a word the aboriginals take too kindly. Wayne Warry (2007) defined it as the “process by which a minority population is absorbed into a prevailing dominant culture”; the dominant culture being that of the European. The fastest way to assimilate the Indians was to remove the children from their homes (the government had already lost hope on the adults) and force them into residential schools. The recommendation came from N.F. Davin who took the idea from native schools based within the United States.