Response- Great Debate I strongly believe that acculturating is better than assimilating in a new country because of many reasons. Acculturating can better develop yourself and your culture. Culture is something every person has and guides us through our lives. If you assimilate, you will forget your own culture because you want to blend in. Assimilation is bad because you are losing your own culture which has been passed on from generation to generation through centuries. Cultures is what makes the world diverse and if everyone assimilates, we will lose many cultures. This leads me to my statement about why acculturating is better than assimilating. Acculturating isn’t always the best option if you want to make friends in a new country but I believe it is the right option. Assimilating will make you blend in and people would want to be around you because you’re all the same. Acculturating could make you feel left out and some people may want to avoid you. Assimilating means following the host country’s traditions which would make you feel normal. Many people would want to be your friend but sometimes you could still make decisions based on own culture which could …show more content…
People should not be judged by their culture or identity. Many people today are open- minded about everyone’s culture and traditions. Assimilation can cause a loss of many cultures that have been passed on from elders. Acculturating is what many people have been doing today to make the world a more culturally diverse place to live. Many cultures have been extinct because everyone in that culture group assimilated. To conclude my argument, acculturating is the better choice for migrants because culture is your identity. It is important to have your own identity instead of assimilating into another culture. Culture belongs to everyone and should never be forgotten because it is our identity and who we
Throughout history, migrants had to meet a specific standard of living, particularly satisfying the means of society, in this case, assimilation. However, throughout time, assimilation developed numerous critiques which allowed integration to overtake this basis. Assimilation, according to the straight line classic assimilation theory, is the ongoing fact that individuals need to assimilate into the receiving country to a core culture of white Anglo Protestant, which will allow them for uncomplicated movement. Under these circumstances, assimilation is unidirectional. On the other hand, integration states that assimilation is not necessary for manageable movement in the receiving country.
While those who argue in favor of assimilation possibly argue from a position of National preservation, those who argue against it potentially argue from the perspective of immigrant preservation. However, in his essay “Assimilation & the persistence of culture”, James Bennett suggests that anti-assimilation sentiments can also originate from a place of Nationalism in that, “By global standards, the culture and social systems of the English-speaking nations are some of the most individualistic. Interactions with other cultures therefore inherently involve a challenge to those features of our culture and a challenge by our culture to the less individualistic, less free features of theirs” (Bennett). Further anti-assimilation arguments claim
At least one example of forced assimilation can be found with in both the Native American culture and the girls raised by wolves’ culture. The move from their homes to go to their new cultures place of liking. Being removed from there culture proved to be difficult. Humans or the civil people ostracize both cultures for being unruly and intolerable to there liking. Being ostracized as a species leaves the beloved culture with an overwhelming fate.
Others go through acculturation which allows them to integrate elements
According to Peter Salins, in his essay Assimilation, American Style, “Assimilation, American style has always been much more flexible and accommodating, and consequently much more affective in achieving its propose”, which is to conform to the American culture while keeping your native culture as well (Salins, 599). Some people claim that by having one culture you increase your chances of being successful they believe “Either Immigrants bring themselves “up” to the native cultural standards or they are doomed to live “out” of the charmed circle of the national culture”, but Salins states otherwise. Salins made it clear
The United States is the most diverse country in the world and people from different countries travel to the United States for a better future or because they just love the United States freedom. The United States was built by immigrant around the world in fact, that is why a lot of people love to go to the U.S.A being that the U.S. accept as much immigrants as they can. Before moving to the United States of America every immigrant should know some basic American tradition; because it will help them understand American traditions. American food are serve in many different ways and the portion option in food is different than any other country. In America their some things that are name differently or we use different rule then other country is like the American language.
At the beginning it is so difficult to make new friends, because a new country means a new culture, and time need to pass in order to learn the new culture. My biggest advantage over other immigrants was that I had a
Assimilation is the process of adapting or adjusting to the culture of a group or nation, or the state of being. It also is the state or condition of being assimilated, or of being absorbed into something. An example of will be, assimilation of immigrants into American life. Assimilation connects a lot to the novel because Kii Yazhi has to adapt to the ways of Americans when he goes to boarding school and has to act like them. In the novel Code Talkers the author Bruchac perfectly shows and explains assimilation.
In Love Medicine Louise Erdrich shows the efforts of assimilation. Many characters tried assimilation, with varying degrees of success and failure. Assimilation could be considered another form of “nature vs. nurture.” In theory, assimilation sounds like a good idea, of lets all fit in together, but it has the condion of as long as you fit in with us.
For example, with cultural assimilation, immigrants will change their culture – in any way, to fit the standards of the majority. Rather than it being a one-way process (assimilation), it is a two-way process (acculturation). As for structural assimilation, immigrants participate in integrated organizations of American society, such as social/civic/work organizations or the US military (Fraga et al. 2016, p. 334). The last type of assimilation the authors analyze is marital assimilation.
For many new immigrants coming to America, it is difficult to adjust into the new society. Many come to America without the basic knowledge of English, the new immigrants do not have the ability assimilate to American society because of the lack of possible communication between the immigrant and an native. Non-English speaking immigrants that come to America face harsh challenges when trying to assimilate to U.S. society because immigrants are often segregated into ethnic communities away from natives, Americans do not know basics of words of other well known languages, and the lack of government funding education programs. Assimilation into a new society is difficult enough, but when the society pushes any new immigrants to separate part
If they assimilate to any ideas because they have no influence of who they are and their culture they can cling onto the wrong ideas. In another article called “What Does It Take to Assimilate in America?” by Laila Lalami it states,” Immigrants contribute to America in a million different ways, from growing the food on our tables to creating the technologies we use every day. They commit far fewer crimes than native-born citizens”. This indicates that people bringing things from their culture (cultural diffusion ) is positive and it is good for the economy. So, keeping your culture, sharing your ideas,beliefs, traditions, etc can really help society and have a great impact on your identity, but if you lose your culture by thinking you should be different because that's what's “normal” you are wrong and can lose the real
Assimilation has a major impact on America and its history. Assimilation is a very controversial topic as many people have different opinions and beliefs about it. The reason people have so many different opinions and beliefs is because assimilation impacts America in so many different ways and happens for so many different reasons. I personally believe assimilation is both good and bad depending on what aspect you 're looking at and how the assimilation is happening. Assimilation can be seen in both the past and present, whether it is forced or happens willingly/naturally.
In assimilation cooperation between cultures will never be found, but it is when a culture is superior over another. Therefore, we as Egyptians will never gain anything by suppressing minorities to follow our way of living. If we desire to become different and a more developed country we have to accept change and respect others and allow them to practice there traditions. Or should we remain as we are? We have to stop forcing foreigners to drop their culture because it does not fit in in our society.
After the migration, each individual of overseas students are maintaining one’s cultural identity. However adaptation to a new environment is necessary regardless of how long the duration of their migration. Meanwhile during the process many of them are challenged on so many different levels. Due to the different culture from one’s country, each individual encountered different challenges of unfamiliar situations. All of these processes influenced individuals’ cognitive process, behavior and influenced perception of how they interpret the world.