ipl-logo

Activity Self-Assessment Questions

566 Words3 Pages

Activity Self-assessment questions 1. How do courts decide if an agreement is intended to be legally binding? 2. Why should an agreement within a family not be legally binding? 3. Why are the cases of Balfour v Balfour and Merritt v Merritt decided differently? 4. Why should commercial agreements generally lead to a legal relationship? 5. How will businesses try to get round the rules on intention? 6. What is an ‘honour pledge clause’? 7. What is the reasoning behind making freegifts, prizes in competitions etc. part of a legally enforceable agreement? Quick Quiz Consider whether the courts would identify an intention to be legally bound in the following situations: 1. Alan agrees that he will buy his son a book in return for mowing the lawns. …show more content…

Sarah finds two mistakes but Crispin does not pay her. Crispin employs his wife, Katie, as his secretary and to keep his accounts. Crispin promises Katie that he will pay her a £100 bonus if his latest book exceeds 10,000 sales.The book sells 12,000 copies but Crispin does not pay Katie the bonus. A. Sarah has a business arrangement with her father and will be able to sue Crispin for the money. C. Katie will not be able to sue Crispin for the £100 bonus because she is his wife. B. Sarah will not be able to sue her father because she is his daughter. C. Katie will not be able to sue Crispin for the £100 because agreements to pay bonuses are not legally

Show More
Related

  • Essay On Zapatha Vs Dairy Mart

    508 Words  | 3 Pages

    The trial court held for Zapatha. Dairy mart appealed. In Zapatha v Dairy Mart, 381 Mass. 284; N.E. 2d. 1370 there are two issues at hand. 1) Does the unconscionability of an agreement depend on whether at the time of execution the contract provision at issue could result in unfair surprise and was oppressive to the allegedly disadvantaged party; and 2) Whether a merchant seeking to terminate a business agreement must act in good faith by practicing honesty in fact and observing reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing in that trade.

    Read More

  • Laws1150 Case Study

    822 Words  | 4 Pages

    Laws1150 Assignment – Contracts There are 4 main issues in this scenario. CHRIS’ ENTITLEMENT TO THE EH HOLDEN i) Did Alina’s email constitute an offer? An offer requires a willingness to be bound by a contract regulated by certain terms. Under the Electronic Transactions Act 2000 (NSW) , s14B (1) specifies that a message conveyed through electronic communication that does not have a specific addressee and or convey an explicit intention to form a binding agreement upon acceptance is an invitation to treat .

    Read More

  • Robert Briggs V. Proud Case Summary

    910 Words  | 4 Pages

    Assignment Week 2 Daisy Taylor Business Law May 12, 2016 Professor Goldstein Keller Graduate School of Management   Chapter 14 problem 2 Real property: Robert Briggs v. Winfield and Emma Sackett Statute of Frauds and Equitable Exceptions is a rule enforced by many states concerning certain contracts. The states statutes are virtually uniform in that they require contracts involving interest in land, one year plus, considerations in marriage, more than one year contracts and many other contracts to be in writing. Common sense tells us that any contract that is very important should be in writing. This is important because in case of any breaches in a contract, then there is solid evidence to help in dealing with the issue at hand (Tepper,

    Read More

  • Case Study Sick Leave

    1060 Words  | 5 Pages

    Finally we will focus some of factors that influenced this situation, and which of these factors are more important. The Dispute Let us start off this week’s assignment by looking at what this dispute means for each party (Kelly and Mr. Higashi) presented in this week’s case study. From the information that we are presented in the case study this dispute means several things for each party involved. For Kelly it appears on one

    Read More

  • How Did Henry Correct In His Claim?

    2004 Words  | 9 Pages

    A) 1. This case is about a contact of sale and purchase. Henry had a written contract for purchasing a guitar. The seller was John. After the terms got written, John orally amended the purchase price.

    Read More

  • Inquirie Granting The Medicines Case Analysis

    447 Words  | 2 Pages

    П had troubles during the month of February due to the expectancy of playing at ∆. П was not able to mitigate his loss by finding suitable employment. П missed out on numerous contacts and creating a chance to promote his music, which caused further damage to П’s benefits. П, in recourse, could satisfy the courts by showing the market value of a dinner piano player at an upscale restaurant. П would also be able to sue for what he would’ve earned if the breach of K did not happen.

    Read More

  • For Husband's Coffee Home Case Study

    447 Words  | 2 Pages

    396-397). Kelsey will enter into a contractual relationship with Shania and Shania will have authority over her as an employer. Kelsey is married to an unbeliever who doesn’t approve of his wife working. He wants her to continue to be a stay-at-home mom for their 13 and 15 year old children. Kelsey’s husband should love her enough to compromise with her work schedule.

    Read More

  • Bankruptcy Case: Novelty Now, Inc.

    1251 Words  | 6 Pages

    Personal jurisdiction is the court's power over the parties involved in the case. Subject-matter jurisdiction is when a case is related to a specific subject matter, such as a bankruptcy case can only be held in bankruptcy court. Minimum contacts is appropriate for a court in one state to assert personal jurisdiction over a defendant from another state. Even though Donald Margolin and his company, Donald Margolin Empire Inc., file suit in the state of New York against Novelty Now Inc. and Chris, Matt, and Ian their contract states In the prompt is says; “Novelty Now’s contract with the three men states that all disputes must be brought in the state of Florida.”

    Read More

  • SRA Code Of Conduct

    984 Words  | 4 Pages

    Also, by trying to act in the best interests of her client, Rafa wrongly called Sara’s office, resulted breaching her legal interest. Then, the principle of maintaining the trust in the provision of legal services was breached since she was unreliable by neglecting to keep the secrets confidential. By uncovering the secrets mean she also broke the trust of the firm towards her. The most serious situation was the call to Sara’s office by saying the discussion to the office’s voicemail while it was confidential. A research shows that every dissatisfied client can lose to the firm nearly 23 clients by communicating the mistakes of solicitors.

    Read More

  • The Doctrine Of Privity In The Tweedle V Atkinson Case

    951 Words  | 4 Pages

    Introduction Doctrine of Privity was established as early as 1861 in the Tweedle v Atkinson case, consisted of two rules: (1) a third party may not have obligations imposed by the terms of a contract; (2) a third party may not benefit from the terms of a contract. The second rule is criticized by scholars and law practitioners for its inability to allow a third party (TP) enforce a contract for his/her favor intended by the contracting parties (CP). And hence, in 1999, the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 (The Act) came into force in United Kingdom, to reform the doctrine. In my opinion, the Act does simplify and mend the problem caused by the Doctrine of Privity but still has its limitation. Discussion: The Act as a simple mechanism Avoiding Inconsistency: inconvenience in commercial life and other legal actions

    Read More

  • Equity And Rule Of Law: Is Equity More Determinate

    894 Words  | 4 Pages

    However, conflicts arose when the two courts started to overlap with each other. One of the main areas of conflict was in relation to the issue of injunctions and this came to a head in the Earl of Oxford’s Case. In the case, the Common Law justices objected to the Chancellor issuing an injunction in order to prevent

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Contract Law

    1166 Words  | 5 Pages

    The modern contract action can be traced to the English common law writs of debt, detinue, and covenant, which were created in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. The fundamental concern of the law of contracts is the enforcement and promissory obligations, that are determined under the contract. The liability of the conctracts can be formed as an express promise, in which the rules of the contract are fully performed, or through the implied in facts promise, where the acceptance or understanding of the contract is showed according to the acts of the party. A contract is a legally enforceable agreement containing one or more promises.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Singularity Of The Scottish Legal System

    141 Words  | 1 Pages

    The singularity of The Scottish Legal System relates to the fact, that although Scotland is part of The United Kingdom of Great Britain (UK) it does have its own distinct legal system with many rules of law that differ from those in the rest of the UK. It should also be noted that in many areas of business law, the law across the UK is the ‘exact same’ or indeed very similar. I.e. In the Sale and Supply of Goods, Consumer Protection, Employment Law, Agency, Partnership and Company Law and Intellectual Property Law. Similarities can be seen within the Law of Contract and Delict, while significant differences are evident in Criminal Law, Property Law, The Law of Trusts and in The Law of Rights in Security, we can see that these differences

    Read More

  • Common Law Set Off Essay

    1040 Words  | 5 Pages

    2.1 Introduction In the previous chapter, I discussed the title, purpose and research methodology of this dissertation. The central point of the dissertation surrounds the question whether common law set-off as it relates to credit agreements governed by the NCA, have been superseded by section 90(2)(n) read with section 124B of the NCA. However, before this analysis is undertaken, it is essential to obtain a firm grasp of the general requirements for set-off.

    Read More

  • Good Faith In International Commerce

    1594 Words  | 7 Pages

    The doctrine of Equity in English law is a mechanism implemented by the legislature to shield the weaker party in contractual relations. Nevertheless, the term good faith is enshrined in other certain types of contracts like in Trust law, the Marine Insurance Act of 1906 and the Unfair Contract Terms Act of 1977 . Additionally, In the process of implementing European Directives, UK has introduced good faith principle on Directive in self-employed commercial agents and the Directive on Unfair terms in consumer contracts.

    Read More

More about Activity Self-Assessment Questions

Open Document