ipl-logo

Rawl's Theory Of Justice Research Paper

1077 Words5 Pages

An impartial perspective on the issue of justice has a long history in the philosophical though. The idea of moral point of view was an important subject for Adam Smith, Hume or Kant. Rawls’ idea of original position is a continuation of that liberal line of thought with the addition of contractarian elements. Unlike, for example, Kant’s categorical imperative formula, justice as fairness is primarily a social procedure. Apart from our natural, individual rights and duties outside society, the rights and duties of justice that persons owe each other in the society can be determined only socially. So, a highly abstract conception of the idea of social contract is employed, firstly through the conception of original position.
Rawls designs …show more content…

First principle of equal basic rights and liberties mostly regulates the political branch of the basic structure while the second principle applies to the economic institutions. First one has priority over second principle in terms of their fulfillment. Second principle has two parts, that inequalities must be attached to positions and offices open to all and that inequalities must expected to be to everyone’s advantage. The latter implies that natural endowments like talents or wealth is undeserved and they can be just only when they’re used to make everyone better off. When applied together, these principles forbid the exchange of basic liberties for economic …show more content…

According to the principle of redress, normative way of dealing with inequalities is to provide artificial advantages to those who are naturally disadvantaged over those who are better equipped for the struggle. The difference principle, on the other hand, prefers to enhance the situation of the disadvantaged not in comparative but in absolute terms. To provide better opportunities to the more advantaged is justified as long as those advantages are going to be used for the common good. In the same fashion with the principle of redress, difference principle also eliminates the obsession with efficiency in the basic structure and employs a more humane

Show More
Related

  • John Rawls Philosophy

    901 Words  | 4 Pages

    I will talk about John Rawls’ philosophy and two major critiques made to his work by G.A. Cohen John Rawls was born in Baltimore in 1921. He was always concerned about poverty in the United States and wanted to change the society he lived in. He wrote his most famous book A Theory of Justice in 1971. This book is considered the most important book in American philosophy after the World War II. John Rawls philosophy is based on his vision of justice.

    Read More

  • The Life And Legacy Of Robert Gould Shaw

    775 Words  | 4 Pages

    Rawls’ idea of justice as fairness, which he presented in his book, “A Theory of Justice,” emphasizes the importance of equal opportunities and equal distribution of wealth and resources in society. This idea resonates with me because, as someone who values fairness and equality, I believe that everyone should have the same chance to succeed and live a fulfilling life. Rawls’ work has taught me to be more aware of societal inequalities and to work towards creating a fairer and more just

    Read More

  • Famine Affluence And Morality Analysis

    1790 Words  | 8 Pages

    Rawls was not happy whit the original arguments about what makes a social institution just. The utilitariam argument says that societies should pursue the greatest good for the greatest number. This argument has many problems, excpecially that it seems to be consistant with the belief of majorities over minorities. The institution argument holds that human intuit what is wright or wrong by some innate moral sense. Rawls attempts to provide a good account of social justice through the social contract approach.

    Read More

  • Michael Norton Unequality

    349 Words  | 2 Pages

    Michael I. Norton wrote the article titled “Unequality: Who Gets What and Why it Matters.” Collaborating with several experiments to prove his ideas, Michael came to the understanding that inequality, from whichever ladder of wealth you fall from, almost everyone supports the idea of being unequal (Norton 152). They do not believe however that we should be as unequal as we are today (Norton 151). Correspondingly, he also understands that inequality in its severity; negatively damages clear decision making, ethical and unethical choices, and demote motivation (Norton 151). Michael asked 16 countries what they assume the level of inequality is versus what they believed the right level of inequality should be (Norton 152).

    Read More

  • Equality And Inequality In King Lear

    966 Words  | 4 Pages

    By constructing the text so that the audience understands inequality can cause more problem in the economy beside unequal opportunities, the author communicates that by identifying the inequality so that everyone can prevent the impacts that it might causes to the

    Read More

  • Egalitarianism In Obamacare

    1048 Words  | 5 Pages

    The natural distribution is neither just nor unjust; nor is it unjust that persons are born in society at some particular position” (Sandel 165). Rawls points out that our society has chosen to ignore the issue of inequity most of the time, so long that the effects of this indifference do not hurt their positions. Moreover, what Rawls has described in this quote is very much evident in our society. The citizens on top–especially upper class white males–have the power to pretend the inequities in American society don’t exist, therefore making our society unjust. More

    Read More

  • A Comparison Of Sandel's Views On Justice And The Common Good

    538 Words  | 3 Pages

    Sandel has two positions on justice and the common good, one is relativist position and one is not. The relativist view is “don’t judge them by some outside view. But instead conceive justice as a matter of being faithful to the shared understandings of a particular tradition (8:05).” Sandel believes the problem with this view is it makes justices seam holy conventional. America is made up of many different cultures and religions therefore this view will cause controversial issues.

    Read More

  • Economic Inequality In America Essay

    856 Words  | 4 Pages

    America prides itself on being one of the most effective democratically governed counties. The idea of the American dream is that all people have equivalent political freedoms and a responsive government. However the effectiveness of social equality is being threatened by increasing inequality in the United States. Economic inequality in the US has expanded drastically. The wealth gap has had drastic changes over the past 35 years.

    Read More

  • Income Inequality Definition

    568 Words  | 3 Pages

    Government had made many policies to reduce income inequality in the United States. There are also welfare programs organized to help people in need. Income redistribution has been used around the country to help poor people. “Economic efficiency occurs when a society obtains the largest possible amount of output from its limited resources. Equity occurs if a society distributes its economic resources fairly among its people” (John, 2008).

    Read More

  • Hobbes Vs Rawls Analysis

    1591 Words  | 7 Pages

    Political theorists, whether they are realists, or liberalists, over the centuries, have come into conflict over what they believe to be the utmost important task of the state. Hobbes believes the most important task of the state is to ensure law and order, rooting his argument in the idea of a sovereign ruler. On the other hand, Rawls, a modern theorist, firmly believes that a state should focus on realising justice within their society. While a utopian society cannot be achieved by either of these theories, I will highlight why Rawls was right in his assumption that the main focus of a state should be to ensure justice for all within their nation, through analysing and comparing the conflicting arguments of Hobbes and Rawls.

    Read More

  • John Rawls The Law Of Peoples Summary

    1463 Words  | 6 Pages

    J RAWLS, The Laws of Peoples-with the Idea of Public Reason Revisited, Harvard University Press: USA, 1999. John Rawls was an influential political philosopher and his publications are widely read. One of which is the Law of Peoples published in 1993 which is the subject of my study. In the Law of Peoples Rawls concerns of the general principles whereby one can uphold and be accept by the liberal people as well as the non-liberal society. “This principle is a standard for which can be useful in regulating the behavior of the citizens towards one and other.”

    Read More

  • Analyzing Rawls Two Concepts Of Rules

    1102 Words  | 5 Pages

    In Rawls’ paper, “Two Concepts of Rules”, he sheds light on fact that a distinction between justifying a practice and actions that fall under said practice, must be made. This distinction, according to Rawls is crucial in the debate between Utilitarianism and Retributivism, more specifically in defending the Utilitarian view against common criticisms, which will be addressed further in this essay. This essay will be examining the troubling moral question that Rawls addresses; The subject of punishment, in the sense of attaching legal penalties to the violation of legal rules. Rawls acknowledges that most people hold the view that punishing, in broad terms, is an acceptable institution. However, there are difficulties involved with accepting

    Read More

  • Essay On Distributive Justice

    742 Words  | 3 Pages

    Our Constitution permits and even directs the State to administer what may be termed 'distributive justice '. The concept of distributive justice in the sphere of law-making connotes, inter alia, the removal of economic inequalities and rectifying the injusticeresulting from dealings or transaction between unequals in society. Law should be used as an instruments of distributive justice to achieve a fair division of wealth among the members of society based upon the principle: 'From each according to his capacity, to each according to his

    Read More

  • John Rawls: The Benefits Of Natural Talents

    913 Words  | 4 Pages

    John Rawls believed that if certain individuals had natural talents, they did not always deserve the benefits that came with having these abilities. Instead, Rawls proposed, these inherent advantages should be used to benefit others. Although Rawls makes an excellent argument on why this should be the case, not all philosophers agreed with his reasoning, especially Robert Nozick. Nozick believed in distributing benefits in a fair manner in accordance with the Entitlement Theory, which has three subsections: Just Acquisition, Just Transfer and Just Rectification.

    Read More

  • John Rawls: Justice As Equality

    1821 Words  | 8 Pages

    Distributive justice by definition deals with the distribution of benefits and burdens across members of a society. Over time, philosophers have argued how these benefits and burdens should be distributed as what results from them fundamentally affects people’s lives. John Rawls, an American moral and political philosopher argued as a liberal “Justice as Equality” by means of his three principles of justice: the principle of equal liberty, equal opportunity and difference. Liberals typically believe that government is necessary to protect individuals from harm by others, but also recognize that government itself can pose a threat to liberty (Minogue, Girvetz, Dagger & Ball, 2018). Rawls believed that everyone in society should have had equal political rights, although social and economic inequalities existed, but only under the condition that they were to the maximum advantage of the least advantaged people in society.

    Read More

More about Rawl's Theory Of Justice Research Paper

Open Document