Those who believe that O.J. is innocent point out the fact that the murder weapon was never found. They believe that if O.J. had committed the murders, he would have had to take his bloody clothes and murder weapon through airport security and given them to Robert Kardashian knowing that the bodies could have been discovered before he landed and the police could have been waiting for him in Chicago (Dershowitz 135). This would have been too risky, showing that O.J.
Dr. Mudd’s Punishment Dr. Mudd’s punishment was too harsh for his involvement with John wilkes Booth. Mudd had not known about Booth planning to assassinate the president. In the article it states, “The doctor rose from his bed, assisted Booth, set the fractured bone. But he did not know, he had no reason to suspect, his patient was a fugitive.” Dr. Mudd had no idea of Booth’s plan and if he did he would have been weary of Booth knowing that he could be on the run. But he didn’t.
Georgie Milton did something not many people have the guts to do, he took the life of his best friend to save him from the torture that awaited him, but, he took the life of another man and he took this life with the intention of murder. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, there is no difference between euthanasia and murder; and to this indictment, George Milton has pleaded not guilty. If I am to prove him otherwise, you must find him so. Lennie Small has been described to us as a caring giant. He had no bad intentions; and it is fair to say that our witnesses have provided us with sufficient evidence to support my argument.
True.” (Armitage, page 2). To put it differently, Moriwaki is little to no emotion for others. For this reason, She can feel no remorse if she commits a sinful thing. Her lack of emotion made it possible for her to murder Kurose. In Moriwaki’s ASPD Medical Report, it states, “term.
Firstly, the doctor only speculated that the Rogers did not give medication to the sickly woman. Also, Justice Wargrave knew little of what went on in the house stating, “[the murder] was impossible to prove, but he was nevertheless quite sure of it in his own mind” (Christie 288). This means the justice decided for the Rogers whether or not this was a crime. He did not have proof of this and the Rogers were never convicted of a crime and, therefore, should not be held accountable for the death. They may have been an influence on the death, but it was never proved.
Has Tutankhamon been murdered? According to Bob Brier he is murdered, although this theory is only based on circumstantial evidence. Examining the cranial X-ray did not show any direct evidence. Tutankhamon’s head trauma cannot be caused by a blow or a fall due to the area where it is located. Since Bob Brier’s investigations more research has been carried out concerning Tutankhamon’s death but no evidence for murder has been found.
The day of the court comes and the jury find the policeman not guilty because they were protecting themselves. However, the police while investigating the incident police never found a gun with or near the boys. The jury didn’t care they just wanted to keep the police protected so we had protection. Police, therefore, need better training. If there would have had better training, they would have known the boys were unarmed.
Cecil committed a first-degree murder whereas Mary committed manslaughter. The murder of Maddon was intended, planned carefully beforehand, and Cecil was aware of what he was doing all throughout. In contrast, Mary Maloney had no intentions of murder her husband that night nor did she plan the murder at all, lastly, she was in emotional shock when she murdered her husband, she was not fully aware of what she was doing. Even the most innocent looking people can commit a crime such as
He told me um, I’m gonna leave you with my cell phone and my car, I need you to come get me, yes. [Ep1: 14:49] The contradicting commentary are very suspicious to the audience. Jay’s statements during his second interview should not be assured as statements about his own knowledge since they are not truthfully correct. But his answers in the second interview are evidently convenient for proving one thing, on the day of Hae Min Lee’s death, Adnan asked Hae for a ride and she was not killed in her car. Providing the question of, How did Adnan kill Hae if he did not have his car nor get a ride from her?
The defense attorney. As Jack’s defense attorney, I would first argue that the police did not find any evidence that Jack stole anything. The only physical evidence was found on Diane. Also, Jack did not admit to any wrong doing. Anything he said to the police should not be allowed as evidence because his parents were not notified or present during the questioning (15 M.R.S.
In the end the two are convicted, although all evidence suggests otherwise. The police and prosecutors are blind to the truth of the situation: Fontenot and Ward are innocent, and, as explained in this report, there is no evidence to prove they committed the crime, and all evidence brought forward by the prosecution is flawed or incorrect. Corpus Delicti Corpus delicti is a Latin term that means "body of the crime". The term
Adnan’s trial was not a fair trial. One of the first questions come to mind, “What about the physical evidence?” No physical evidence was brought up, other than the star witness, Jay. Police has not been investigating this seriously, yes, there were some fingerprints affiliated to Adnan on Hae’s map