As the presence of a coalition was uncommon till now, new constitutional norms were created and old ones were revised. For the doctrine of ministerial accountability, it isn’t important how many parties run the government, but that it is still one government. The members of government should all adopt the same position to ensure certainty and confidence in the government. The coalition also had great effect on the prime minister’s power when appointing ministers. Instead of choosing ministers at his own discretion, Cameron had to consult Clegg about it.
Lately, Westminster model is failing in the political system in Britain (Marsh, Richards and Smith 2003, p. 306). It is therefore essential to dig deep into the reasons why the political model is not relevant and find a new way of governing people. Democracy is best practiced when all the citizens are given the opportunity to identify some of the issues that are important to them. The political model has not been able to give the citizens audience in the United Kingdom to practice democracy (Richards and Smith 2006, p.181). The primary reason is that under the model, a small group of people is given powers by the parliament to act on behalf of all the citizens within the country (Lovenduski and Norris 2003, p. 84).
Representative democracy is preferable because it allows freedom and voice of the people. Representative Democracy Defined Representative democracy is similar to democracy however, it allows elected citizens to represent others in a government process. It provides governance through freedom and equality through consensus among the people. Representative democracy is defined by Wilson, Dilulio, Bose, and Levendusky as a government in which leaders make decisions by winning a competitive struggle for the popular vote. This form of government has less control of the people, allowing them to have the freedom to join clubs, organizations, political parties, and other groups of their choice.
or a government that allow your opinions but makes it harder to run the country because they have different opinions. But some people feel that democracy have more control over what goes and and they make all the decisions . People still feel that dictatorship is better and they can use to it to their advantage. This country should have a democracy government because it makes it gives us a chance to express our concerns and opinions about what the government is doing . In the text it states that “ The current leaders in a perfect democracy would have zero influence, whereas an absolute dictatorship would place total control over the decision in one person’s hands”(Acemoglu,2012) .
The system allows for the voices of the people to be heard through the popular vote and have elected officials make educated decisions based on the opinions of the nation’s citizens. However, the way the Electoral college is set up makes it possible for a candidate to be elected president without the majority of the popular vote (U.S. Electoral College). The combination of the controversial nature of the College and the differing opinions of U.S. citizens leads to a question being asked: Is the Electoral College damaging to the democratic system in United States, or is it a pivotal extension of our democracy? While some U.S. citizens feel that the Electoral College should be abolished, there are those who feel the system plays a key role in our Presidential election.
Other than being a good learning opportunity it gives the people a voice in the government. The article Why Jury Trials are Important to a Democratic Society says “We do not want judges and lawyers making every important decision; they are not representative of the people of the United States. Juries provide the voice of common sense and the perspective of the citizen to our developing law of the land.” Judges and lawyers are only a small part of people in the United States having juries allows for all different people to come and represent their opinion and make a choice based solely on common sense and
These political systems range from direct democracies to totalitarian regimes, such as military dictatorships. Common systems in the modern world include democratic republics, monarchies, and representative democracies. There are also primarily theoretical types of governments, like a strict meritocracy. One of the most often-talked about political system is a representative democracy. This is a system in which representatives are directly elected by the citizens, and these representatives then make political decisions for the people, with the assumption that their decisions will reflect the general will of the republic.
Hence, this is to demonstrate the point that in a system of Parliamentary Democracy, the power is ultimately with the people who elected their representatives to Parliament to make laws that is in the interests of the people i.e. public interests. This means, the courts do not also have the jurisdiction to inquire if the laws passed by the Parliament was good on the grounds of public
The democratic form of government has the potential to lead a group of people to success, but sometimes democracy doesn’t seem like the best way to run a country. It is a government by the people, which means the people need to participate actively in the functions of the government. Democracy also works best when educated people can guide and make informed decisions about the future of the society. The majority must agree, and if they don’t, people separate and democracy is no longer as effective. Also, in certain cases, corruption inside democracy can lead to the downfall of democracy and turn it into another form of government.
Democracy signifies participation of the people in the execution of their regime (Beramendi 2008). A democratic government is run by the people and its aim is public interest. Similarly, Backer and Raveloson (2008) explain democracy as a government which comes into power through general public, is practiced by the public and is there to work for the best interest of the public. Democracy can also be understood in opposition of other government systems; dictatorships, monarchies and aristocracies. In government systems, other than democracy, mostly, people have no or minute control over who will rule their state; contrarily, in democracy, people themself decide who will govern them or how their country will be run (Zimmermann 2012).