ipl-logo

Advantages And Disadvantages Of A Written Constitution

1270 Words6 Pages

Constitution is the written law, the principles and rules of a country but also the relationship between the individual and the state. The powers of the government and the right of the people pumped from the constitution. Most of the states does possess a written constitution but United Kingdom isn’t one of the according to FF Ridley. Although a part of United Kingdom constitution as it said is written in several documents such as the legislations, the treaties, the conventions but also the in the judicial decisions. Instead of having a codified constitution in a single document United Kingdom choose to split it in several documents. FF Ridley has an opposite opinion and he support his position by saying that United Kingdom does not possess a written constitution because it fails to cope any of the four essential elements of a right …show more content…

The first main disadvantage is that a codified constitution can be described as rigidity. That means if United Kingdom codified its constitution it will lose its flexibility and eventually the chance to renewal every law need to amend. One great example is the United States constitution which has only had 27 amendments since 1787. Another significant disadvantage is the Judicial Tyranny. Judicial Tyranny is interpreted by the judiciary and such it can be the case that judge can legislate from the bench. , Another significant disadvantage, the parliamentary sovereignty would be effectively abolished. The principle of parliamentary sovereignty states that parliament can make or unmake or even amend any law it wishes. United Kingdom will lose a massive privilege if someday decide to codified it constitution. Last but not least, a codified constitution would give the judiciary a political point of view witch it will require from the ultimately supreme court to form judgements of issues with political nature that should be dealt by the politicians them

Show More
Related

  • Informative Essay: Supporting The Constitution

    444 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Articles had many weaknesses so we as americans had to create a stronger government to run our country on. I think the Constitution was a good idea for America because it fixed many of our country’s problems which were from the Articles of Confederation. The constitution gave us a national currency, gave us the bill of rights amendments, and made it so the powers were split equally between three branches. The ratification was good

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Constitution To Replace The Articles Of Confederation

    221 Words  | 1 Pages

    The United States should adopt the Constitution to replace the Articles of Confederation. The new Constitution provides many advantages and new opportunities. First, the Constitution gives more power to the national government in many ways. For example, under the Articles the national government had to ask the states for money, but under the Constitution the government is provided with money and the power to tax. In addition, the Articles allowed states to regulate trade causing each state to tax one another's products.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

    196 Words  | 1 Pages

    Before ratifying the Constitution, a constitutional convention was called in 1787 to change the Articles of Confederation. This meant that each state had only one vote in Congress, and the size didn’t matter. The debate was between the federalists and Anti-Federalist, one side wanted to ratify the constitution and the other side didn’t. It was not easy because there were documents and articles both supporting and going against it. Who are the federalists?

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Pros And Cons

    1054 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Articles were poorly designed, giving the government more power than it should have. The Articles of Confederation Issues that Congress would not be able to impose taxes and that the power would be given to the states. The government was depending on the states for making all the money and funds, even though we still had a debt to pay off after the war. There were some states that did not always contribute to the government and congress did not have the power to create a sturdy currency that all of America could use. This new Constitution would fix all of these problems that we had with the Articles of Confederation, with the Bill of Rights, New branches of government, and checks and

    Read More

  • Explain The Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

    439 Words  | 2 Pages

    Having a weak central government created a whole new set of problems. After analyzing the Articles of Confederation the weaknesses outnumbered the strengths. Such as states not having to obey the laws and ignore taxations because they had no authority to enforce them. Congress did not have the power to collect taxes from the each of the states, that was one major weakness especially during the Revolutionary War because instead of getting the money they had to ask the states for money and the states said no. At that point the government should have put their foot down and enforced a new law, their troops were fighting for their freedom and these people didn’t care.

    Read More

  • Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

    829 Words  | 4 Pages

    When introducing anything new in any area, you will always have many issues. The Constitution was one of the first to show the weakness in the Articles of Confederation. The founding fathers had it very tough when they had to draft the Declaration of Independence and make sure they answered the complaints of the people. Another document that was introduced shortly after was the Bill of Rights. The Bill holds the government to what kind of power they can use.

    Read More

  • Was The Us Constitution A Success Or Failure

    862 Words  | 4 Pages

    The US Constitution was written by the Founding Fathers 230 years ago. They came together at the Philadelphia Convention to amend the Articles of Confederation, that had been a huge failure. The country was failing, because the states were not bound together and each had their own currency. The US was bankrupt, and there weren’t any other options than overthrowing the government, which led to a new constitution, the US Constitution as we know it today. The Constitution was a radical break from the past.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

    521 Words  | 3 Pages

    Currently, me and other Americans are undergoing a change in government. Because there are numerous major flaws in the Articles of Confederation, Congress thought it would be best to draft a new Constitution. Hopefully, the people behind the ratification of the new Constitution are making the right choice. Apparently Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay are helping out.

    Read More

  • Federalists Vs Antifederalist Essay

    590 Words  | 3 Pages

    Name: Jeshuwin Prabakaran Before the Constitution was approved and known as the structure of our government, we had the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was a broken system, with no central government to collect taxes or enforce law we were burying ourselves in massive debt while States taxed each other. There was no National Court System or Supreme Court which made serious cases harder to deal with often having a less just outcome. These are the few of the multiple flaws and reasons it was necessary to replace the Articles of Confederation with the Constitution.

    Read More

  • What Are The Advantages Of The Articles Of Confederation

    406 Words  | 2 Pages

    Numerous people argue that the articles of confederation were weak and unsuitable for the United States, but there are multiple advantages to this document. Such as having no single leader to rule over them and tell them what to do, each state had one vote in the congress, and the congress could settle in and deal with the western lands. The Articles of confederation could have been strong and suitable for the United States because it protected the states from earlier tyranny that they had experienced due to the British King George lll, and promised to prevent any tyrannical rule of the British. The articles of confederation also allowed each state one vote, regardless of the number of delegates each had, the size of their state, or the

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Us And Texas Constitution

    985 Words  | 4 Pages

    But beyond these general features, the two constitutions could not be more different. These differences result from the fact that the two documents arose out of very different historical circumstances and for radically opposite complaints with the document each was meant to replace. With the U.S. Constitution, the problem with the earlier Articles of Confederation was that government was too decentralized and not powerful enough. The U.S. Constitution was designed to overcome these weaknesses and offer a degree of centralization and increased government power.

    Read More

  • Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Essay

    487 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 4 different ways, the constitution helped guard against tyranny. With Federalism, Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances, and Big States and Small States Compromise. All of these ways are all very important, because they all help guard against tyranny in their own way. With the constitution and all of these different ways, there is a very, very slim chance that we will become a dictatorship like North

    Read More

  • Essay On Canadian Constitution Vs Us Constitution

    521 Words  | 3 Pages

    The two constitution I am gonna compare are the United States of America constitution, and the Canadian constitution. Like the U.S constitution, the Canadian constitution is mostly the same since it got many of its laws from the U.S constitution. Both constitution have many provinces that they are divided into since the place is too big, as well as to divide power, as well as that they both have an executive power since they need someway to be able to divide the power. Unlike the U.S, Canada has a Queen that controls the executive government. Canada has its own version of the Bill Of Rights called Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the end of its constitution.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Constitution And Texas Constitution

    670 Words  | 3 Pages

    Texas Constitution V. Maine Constitution What is a constitution? According to Merriam Webster Dictionary a constitution is a document that describes the system of beliefs and laws by which a country, state or organization is governed. In numerous ways, the Texas and Maine constitution are similar documents.

    Read More

  • Different Types Of Government Essay

    1511 Words  | 7 Pages

    However, the U.K. has no formally written constitution like the US. Instead, they use what may be referred to as its constitution is the entire body of its laws and principles that deal with regulating the populace and running the government. The embodiment of constitutionalism is the control of power by its distribution among a few state organs or offices, such that they are each subjected to proportional controls. As a result this compels them to coordinate in planning the will of their states. Furthermore, the United States has a constitutional government in which the powers of the central government are limited by law to create individual states with certain degrees of self-governing powers.

    Read More

More about Advantages And Disadvantages Of A Written Constitution

Open Document