A government is the most important element in a state. A state cannot be formed without the presence of a government. The government is changeable and it has different forms and these forms can be seen in different states in the world. In my essay Iam going to explain absolute monarchy, constitutional monarchy, democratic republics. Federal states and stateless territories. Absolute monarchy in other words absolutism is when a ruler or leader has ultimate authority to run a state and the ruler ruled by Devine right. Devine right was the claim that a king was given his position by some higher power. The authority of the monarchy included the following areas administration, taxes, justice and foreign policy. In an absolute monarchy decisions …show more content…
Problems are solved faster because they only need to go through one person who is the king. The law making process is simpler since the king makes the laws. The state has a strong Amy which is a benefit to the state because it will have good defence. The disadvantages absolutism is that it leads to inequality of wealth. Where there is an irresponsible leader it is quite hard for people around to force this leader out or replace him with a more effective leader. A bad leader can cripple the nation due to inexperience and no qualities of leadership.There are bad leaders because leaders inherit leadership at a young age. Constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which a queen or king acts as a head of state where he or she has the ability to pass and make legislation residing with an elected parliament not with the monarch. As a system of government constitutional monarchy differentiates the head of state and officials from party officials. A constitutional monarchy provides stability, continuity and a national focus. The head of state remains the same even if the government changes. Leadership is inherited and elective as well. A parliament is present and the constitution is also
King Louis XIV of France recommended absolute rule because he believed that the less people there are to exploit it. (Document 3) I agree with him and I believe it is one of the reasons for the prosperity of absolutism. When one person controls an entire country,
During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, leaders all around Europe were beginning to desire a stronger rule over their people. In numerous countries, absolutism was becoming a popular way to rule a nation, as it gave leaders the ability to have full control over their territory. Many believed that leaders became absolute through the power of God and divine right. However, rulers were able to gain power through military pursuits and well-controlled foreign relations. Therefore, international war gave leaders in Prussia, Russia, and Austria the foothold they needed to create absolute monarchies.
Philosopher Rousseau disagreed that power came from the king, but rather it comes from the people. He believed, “The people, being subject to the laws, ought to be their author” ( Doc 5) Kings would input laws, with really no consent others, and during the enlightenment that idea was changed. Not only was the idea of divine right challenged in many ways, but also freedoms. During the Age of Absolutism, many were not able to express their opinion, nor be able to express their opinions.
For every part of your government, we know what needs to be done. The main part of the government is the constitution, which includes the laws and rules of the land. A constitution is extremely important for the start
Our national government has not always dad this much influence over matters concerning this country. Under the Articles of Confederation, power for the national government was vastly limited compared to the current central government today. The people who wrote the Articles where worried about a strong central government that would oppress them like the King did. In turn they came up with the Articles of Confederation which gave greater power to the states instead of the national government. Under the Us Constitution the central government know has more power than it did under the Articles of Confederation to stabilize the United States.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness” (U.S.). This quote, from the Declaration of Independence, is probably one of the most well-known quote there is. It speaks of man’s right to be free and equal of any one man out there. As we have all learned in our history class back in junior high, the Declaration of Independence was written mainly by Thomas Jefferson to explain why the colonies wanted independence from Great Britain. This document is a list of complaints by the English colonists’ against King George III.
Some people like Thomas Hobbes believed that they needed an absolute monarchy or else there would be chaos, every man vs. every man in a fight over selfishness. Hobbes believed that there needed to be a monarch to scare the people for obedience and order. Another who believed this was Catherine the Great, she stated “Not to deprive people of their natural liberty; but to correct their actions, in order to attain the supreme good” (Doc 2). Then there were people like John Locke who believed that the people can govern themselves and the only laws that were needed were laws to protect a man's natural rights; life, liberty and property. Locke believed that natural rights were given to you by god and no one could break or take them away.
Compare the history of how we got to our current constitution to something else and why that is so? A constitution is literally a rule book. It states many different things in it. It sets up major governing institutions, assigns institutions their given power, and places explicit and implicit control on power that given to them. A constitution establishes literal legitimacy, it’s the real deal.
The Age of Absolutism is defined as a time period in Europe in which monarchs gained all of the power and wealth over the state for themselves, expanding the idea of single rule. The Enlightenment, on the other hand, is defined as a movement during the 18th century that rejected traditional social, religious, and political ideas, and introduced a desire to construct governments free of tyranny (or single rule). Document 3, a primary source written by King Louis XIV of France in 1660, is describing the idea of monarchy stating,“ The more you grant . . . [to the assembled people], the more it claims . . . The interest of the state must come first” (Document 3).
The framers of the Texas Executive established a system that was designed to check the powers of the government. As opposed to the US Constitution that vested the power of the executive in the president of the nation (Berry, 1385), the Texas Constitution sought to ensure that the state did not have the excess powers. As such, they came up with a plural system where a variety of individuals make up the executive branch of the state (Texas State Government at a Glance). While the governor of the state remains as the highest ranking officials in the state, they hold the least of powers in the plural system.
During the 1600s and 1700s a new type of monarch emerged known as an absolute ruler. Some of these rulers were Louis XIV, the Fredericks of Prussia, and Peter the Great. These rulers believed that a monarch had a divine right to rule and should only listen to God. All these rulers had characteristics that defined them as absolutists. Louis XIV was constantly at war during his reign which resulted in a powerful army.
I think the purpose of government is to make and enforce laws the main purpose of government is to protect it citizen. The purpose of government is to keep strict order and to stop is citizens from hurting one another. An effective system of government protection it citizens. The purpose of government is to ensure the safety of the nation and its resident. While other concerns such as economic growth are important, governments primary duty is keep people save.
Absolute monarchies had all the power in Europe. Their kingdoms were powerful and accomplished. Although absolute monarchies empowered and enriched their kingdoms, they were still largely detrimental because of King Louis XIV of France, debt, Frederick the Great’s seizure of Silesia, and the city of St. Petersburg. King Louis XIV of France was an absolute monarch.
The government today is based off a document written over 200 years ago called the Constitution. This document helped form the government and country we live in today.. The United States Constitution is still relevant today because it formed the way this great nation would be run, from checks and balances, separation of powers and the rule of law structuring the way the government will function. At the end of the American Revolution the founding fathers wrote and signed a document called the Declaration of Independence. This document was written to tell the sovereignty of great britain that they will not be under his rule.
Absolute monarchy is rule by one person, usually a King or Queen, who obtains absolute power of authority with no repercussions for what he or she does. Bishop Bossuet held strongly to the argument of absolute monarchy, whereas John Locke opposed on the basis of man's natural rights. Bossuet and Locke have different views on the government’s source of power and their ideas about the rights of the people, but agreed that their chosen theories are in the best interest of the people and held their country's unity in high regard. The first thing we can look at when comparing the two philosophers ideas, is their differences of opinions on the government's source of power.