Literature Review (3)
According to (McGee, 1992), he stated that making insider trading legal would make it clearer for all individual investors to know where they are investing their money. But keeping it banned will create illusion of fairness which keeps everyone worse off. Insider trading is actually an active good. Insider trading bans not actually stamp out insider trading. Insider trading remains and may actually be growing, which puts law-abiding investors at a disadvantage.
The author has taken the case example of Enron, whereby if there was existence of insider trading than late Enron CEO Ken Lay might have been exposed his sundry frauds earlier. Markets work best when goods are priced well. Which simply means that a firms stock price should reflect the firms both strengths and weakness. Whereby is a firm is involved in giant Enron- style scam, the price should be correspondingly low. Its stock price did not reflect
…show more content…
Fair only exists in fairy tales. The markets are inherently unbalanced. There are participants that have faster computers, better alogrthms and smarter staffs .There are those that transact a lot of business with certain investment banks who are going to get more favorable allocations in IPOs and follow-on offerings because they are better clients. So somehow there will be other participants that will be having a disadvantage.
Insider trading does not harm in the long term investment, the main idea is that insider trading contributed importantly to the efficiency of stock market pricing.
By and large the idea that there is no direct harm from the practice has held up very well, especially the point that there is no real damage caused to an investor who engages anonymously on an exchange in a trade with an insider on the other side of the transaction. The author Mr. Doug claimed that , essentially the biggest and best information gathering machine in the world is by legalizing insider
I do believe that distribution and wealth is definitely unfair. It is only common sense. Why would you take more away from those who are barely making it? It does not benefit the 99 percent at
It’s not fair how some people gets to grow up with rich parents and many poor. Many people have more Opportunities to be successful in life than others. Although the world is not fair, i believe thats how its supposed to be. If everything in this world was fair then we would not be free.
Introduction In this paper the ethical issues within the business world is shown by the movie Fun with Dick and Jane. There are some issues throughout the movie the can be argued that they are for the greater good but remain unethical. There are also issues that are clearly unethical and benefit no one except one person who caused the issue. A few of the issues involved theft, embezzlement, fraud, lying, bribery, and corporate insider trading.
This suggests that there is some advantage to begin an insider, which is certainly true. At the same time outsider candidates have advantages as well. By looking at the cases of Obama versus Clinton, which resulted in Obama winning
The business world wasn’t the only thing corrupt but the railroads were too. With the railroad industry growing the companies knew they could charge huge rate and gain a large profit. Congressmen were paid off to be quite about the scandal and kept it to themselves. The railroads raised the stocks and were given to well-liked companies.
That’s Not Fair That’s not fair! How many times have we heard this statement uttered? Stanley Fish, author of the article “Fair Is Fair,” points out that fairness is better than equality and the idea that “everyone should have the same stuff.” Is life fair and are we all as Americans presented with equal opportunities?
Dr. Lavoie discussed the concept of “fairness” in this way. “Fair doesn’t mean equal or everyone getting the same. Fairness means that each student receives what he or she needs.” Reflect on your reaction/thoughts to this.
However, the “steadily rising price of stocks” on the Wall Street stock market attracted more investors (Give Me Liberty, Eric Foner, pg 786). “Many assumed that
Also stocks were only valued at 20 percent. The Down Jones market
“Chasing Madoff”, a documentary released in 2010 portrays the way the whistleblower, Harry Markopolos, uncovered Bernie Madoff’s fraud scheme and his ten-year struggle to get the SEC to investigate. The documentary begins with an introduction to Harry Markopolos and his former coworkers Frank Casey and Neil Chelo. The three men work in finance, with investment portfolios. They were aware that in the finance industry there was much talk about an investment company making their customers high returns. Casey came across some investment information from a client of Madoff and gives the information to Markopolos to look over.
A) Introduction Unethical behaviors in business affect everyone since you either work in the field or are a consumer of its services. Unfortunately, almost every company usually has individuals who act unethically whether it is for their personal benefit or for the sake of the company they work for. Unethical behaviors in business might be as simple as using company property or funds for personal gain to inside trading and financial fraud. According to The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, nearly one third of business professionals feel pressured to compromise their ethical standards and are increasingly pushed towards unethical behavior. Moreover, “misconduct is common and accepted by business services professionals, the integrity of entire economic systems is at risk”, states Jordan A. Thomas, partner and chair of the Whistleblower Representation Practice at Labaton Sucharow law firm.
(Johnson , 2014 ) In this case , it shows that under normal circumstances the management level of a company or corporation will choose to hide the truth over honesty and integrity .In other way , profitability has override the important of ethics in the corporation .
And if this is the case, its conduct is closely knitted to the success and failure of it. And as the case of other publicly traded tech giants, like Google. And this is a very interesting fact, anything that these tech giant do can be concealed within its company. However, once there is a whistleblower, there will be a ripple effect seen within the company. A scandal will be in the news and the stocks will fall for that specific company.
Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers got -0.0635 and 0.7507 respectively, which suggesting these two companies might use some methods to hide its operating performance. In table 9, Enron, Qwest, Global Crossing, and Tyco also had red flags. This tells us that Quality Ratios works efficiently for fraudulent financial reporting companies. 6) Valuation Ratios Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns got red flags on all valuation ratios. Many major fraudulent companies had red flags of P/E ratio and many large U.S. banks had red flags of P/S ratio.
Background WorldCom, once known as one of the most powerful telecommunication organizations of the world, is now studied as a case of a fraudulent company that carried out unethical financial activities to cover its weakening position in the market. After some aggressive investment decisions, the company started to witness huge financial pressure. The management used various forged accounting entries to conceal its weakening position. Cynthia Cooper, Vice President Internal Audit, discovered the unethical activities and raised the issue with the management and relevant departments and received bitter responses. She carried out internal audits in her own capacity with her colleagues and compiled evidence against fraudulent activities.