He suggests the names of judges to Senate and with advice and consent of Senate, judges are appointed by the President. Judicial committee of Senate plays very significant role in evaluating the cardinals of the proposed judges of the Supreme Court. They make the investigation of the background of judges, they hold the face to face interaction with judges, the judges are queered and grilled and questions are put. The whole process happens in public and in transparent manner. The citizens of US has any information about judges integrity, they can send the information with evidence to the Senate Judicial Committee which will make the further investigation and make sure that no unworthy candidate will be appointed as judges to the Supreme Court.
P2/P3:Explain the role of lawyers in criminal and civil cases Solicitors Solicitors give advice on areas of the law. Solicitors are the first people who are contacted when somebody or businesses are looking for legal advice or for them to be represented. Solicitors are normally within a team in firms owned by the solicitors. Some solicitors also work for the local government.
Eventually it was said that a juror must know briefly about the facts of a case before a trial is conducted and the relevance of it today. Although these days only a few cases are attempted by juries, the jury is considered as an important part of the English legal system. In a way, it plays a fundamental role in making sure that the criminal justice system is useful for the public instead of biased leaders. There are twelve
This occurs when the Sunset Commission holds a hearing about the final results of the Sunset Staff report and the agency overall. Then, after the first hearing, the Sunset Commission organizes a meeting to vote on which provisions it should recommend to the Legislature. The Sunset Commission will also listen to several public testimonies and will take any public input and immediately publish it on the Texas Sunset Review website. Finally, once the Sunset Commission has voted, they will recommend to the legislature which actions it should proceed
The rhetorical analysis of the court document “Kinkel vs The State of Oregon”. The document was written to explain the arguments of both sides of the court and to justify the decision made by the court and the judge through facts and rhetorical accounts of events that transpired. The judge clearly uses Ethos, Logos, and Pathos within the analysis which is used to his advantage. There are many audiences involved in the court and trial. There is the defendants and the victim’s family members present.
As a predisposition writer in a juvenile setting the probation officer will be tasked with the important process of writing a report for the judge to take into consideration. A Predisposition report consists of the client’s complete prior history. The probation officer that writes these reports is required to gather all the information that they feel will be necessary to make a proper judgment on the juvenile. Probation officers will collect information on the juveniles past history with law enforcement, family problems, mental health issues, what they client feels are their needs and wants, and numerous other issues that may arise during the meeting. Once this information is gathered and concluded to be factual the probation officer will
If an investigator is assigned to determine if enough evidence exists to potentially charge the nurse with a violation of the Nurse Practice Act, he will interview witnesses, review submitted documents, and compile all evidence for the case file. The Alabama Board of Nursing employs two nurse consultants in the Legal Division, one of whom will be assigned the case to review and then provide a recommendation which is then scrutinized by the Board’s attorney. The Board’s attorney reviews all of the evidence as well as the nurse consultants’ recommendation and then decides how to proceed.2C- Patient abandonment- Acceptance of a patient assignment, thus establishing a nurse patient relationship, and then ending the nurse-patient relationship without giving reasonable notice to supervisory personnel so that others can make arrangements for continuation of nursing care.2D- Graduate Nurse-
During the trial two witnesses were called, including a police officer from the Bunbury police station and a detective for the organised crime squad. Both chose to swear oath before giving their statement. The first witness showed a video of the arrest on 29 August 2014 and was asked to comment on the different actions and statements made during the video. Judge Levy confirmed the video footage was labeled exhibit 3. The second witness was mainly asked about his expertise and knowledge of meth which he developed through his career.
Presentence investigative reports (PSI) are presented to a judge, often by a probation officer, to give the facts surrounding the case and make sentence recommendations. There is a standard format for PSI reports (double-spaced with numbered lines in the left margin). The facts presented should include: information about all parties involved in a case, the official and defendant 's version of events, the impact of the incident on the victim, the detailed criminal and social background of the defendant, and a statement concerning evaluation and sentence recommendations from the probation officer. As with any official document, PSI reports should be held to high standards of writing and grammar.
There are some very important rights granted to you jfrom the 6th amendment which I think if you are going to trial you should try and use to your advantage. you will get a trial by a jury and also with that jury they will be able to hear all witnesses and see all evidence received for the case. The opportunity to see, hear, and confront the witnesses presenting the case against them as well. They will get an chance to call witnesses and even have the court give subpoenas to make sure the witnesses appear they also can testify themselves it they would like to if not they can refuse to testify. they will have the right to cross-examine a witness who is trying to testify against them as well.