A leader is anyone who uses interpersonal skill to influence others to achieve goals of the organization. According to Sullivan and Decker (2010),” the functions of a leader are to achieve a consensus decision making within the group about its goal, maintain a structure that facilitates accomplishing the goal, supply necessary information that will help to provide direction and clarification, and maintain group satisfaction, cohesion, and performance”. Leadership is the process of guiding, motivating, directing, influencing, and teaching the activities of others towards achieving the goals of the organization. As businesses today strive to improve their performance in the context of a world that is changing around them, leadership and organizational
Organizational leaders today must portray a wide range of skills and attributes in order to be successful in driving their organizations to success. For instance among the most significant skills and traits that leaders need to have include communication skills, team management skills, decision making, and conflict resolution in order to manage the people within the organization effectively (Charnov, 2008). These skills will enable the managers and organizational leaders. For instance, communication skills will enable the leaders to bring their interpersonal skills into use when relating with different people and creating a common understanding among key stakeholders in their organizations. Decision making and conflict resolution will help
Theoretical framework Emergent leaders could lead people effectively if they embrace the difference between leadership and management. In essence, management is the aspect of doing things right while leadership is the aspect of doing right things. A leader and a manager play different roles, although people tend to use the two terms interchangeably. For instance, a manager facilitates the success of team members (Mumford, Watts & Partlow, 2015). Further, a manager ensures that members have whatever they require for success.
The last key style of leadership is Laissez- Faire. Delegative leaders provide very little guidance to the group members and leave decision- making up to the employees. The workers are least productive under this style of leadership. The employees make more demands and refuse to work independently. However, it is very effective when members in a group are qualified in an area of expertise.
However, according to Weber, the formal, impersonal relationships only benefits for the organisation, since without the emotional bonds, one can rationally evaluate and guide the employees without personal bias. Furthermore, the importance of rational decision making is also emphasised in the theory of bureaucratic management. In this case, when a manager decides about an important question or implementation of a new strategy, he/she should rely on pure logic instead of listening to the opinion of employees. Unlike in a matrix structure, in bureaucratic structure employees are often located to one specialised task in which they have to master their skills (Ibid). It can help the employees to fully concentrate on their fields and tasks, however it can make their work monotonous and boring.
- Creativity or out of the box thinking is not seen as important and is usually overlooked by the leader. - Rules are highly regarded and are usually communicated clearly to employees. Advantages and Disadvantages of Autocratic Leadership: The advantages of Autocratic leadership are that it allows for fast and effective decisions in a crisis situation, this is due to the ability of make quick decisions without having to discuss amongst team members which wastes valuable time. There is a significant amount of leadership which means that employees do not lack in organisation or workloads, which enables important deadlines not to be missed. Autocratic leadership allows for
Finally, being able to foresee the circumstances and always be ready to take any risk. In my opinion, Warren Buffet has showed the best leadership style. His style can be said as a combination of a democratic leadership, servant leadership and self-empowered leadership which gives different impacts. As a democratic leadership, two way communications is very much important in order to discuss with his employees about things to be accomplished. As a servant leader, empathizes towards his employees is needed to run a company whereas self-empowered leader is all about his loyalty and the strategy plan for
Communication is something basic inside businesses, because accordingly, the collaboration everybody gives to obtain effective results can depend. All the workers must understand the purpose that the company is trying to achieve so; in this way, they can participate and help to move on in strategies, projects,
This is primarily because they like to be in control of situations. This style of management involves few people in the process of decision making, therefore resulting in work getting done on time. Autocratic management style works well where the motivation of the employees is low. However, there are problems with this management style. One is that the staff may lose motivation working in such an environment because they have no say in the decision making process.
Decisions in an organization that display a power culture are centralized around one key individual. That person likes control and the power behind it. As group work is not evident in a power culture, the organization can react quickly to dangers around it as no consultation is involved. However this culture has its problems, lack of consultation can lead to staff feeling undervalued and de-motivated, which can also lead to high staff turnover. Role culture Common in most organizations today is a role culture.