This is an affirmation for your work, it makes it stronger and by replication your claims can be better supported. The reproducibility of data is important because it creates more opportunity for new insights, since you need to make changes to the methodology to reproduce the data but still aim at achieving the same results. When reaction conditions are changed, you may shine light on new possibilities, which can lead to disproving of a hypothesis or the conception of a new one. Sonnenburg et al. claim that reproducibility of experimental results is a cornerstone of science.
It is like saying you are learning from you mistakes or you are trying to find a better way. Using the traditional way is when you use your beliefs to prove something. The pros to this is that you can use a lot more references when you are trying to study something. You can get a lot from past studies of scientists and try to continue or improve what they have started. You can learn from the past mistakes and see what can be changed so that those mistakes would not be repeated.
An example could be art since it is developed by someone’s own imagination. So, in the following paragraphs we will discuss how shared knowledge can shape personal knowledge, or how can personal knowledge shape shared knowledge and whether these two ways of knowledge may be inseparable or even the same thing. This will be done by reference to two areas of knowledge which are Art and the Natural Sciences physics and biology. In the case of natural science, personal knowledge and shared knowledge can be linked since a lot of individual’s knowledge with the help of shared knowledge can lead to new ideas and innovations. Take for example Stephen Hawking one of the most important scientists of our time.
Consensus and disagreement are equally important to obtaining large amounts of knowledge, but are the two also responsible for hindering someone’s access to correct knowledge? I believe consensus can be described as an agreement among peers and a disagreement would be the inverse, a disagreement among peers. Too often, people that have a limited knowledge on a subject are able to discuss it, and without proper research, or even a well-structured peer review, the conclusions that can be made about a subject are skewed and incorrect- leading to a gain of incorrect knowledge. This is seen very often throughout history in dictatorships and in the natural sciences where peer reviews take place. In the natural sciences, consensus and disagreement
Geological oceanographers are also interested in coastlines and their changes, studying beaches in particular to determine the effects of major storms, seasonal variations owing to changed wave conditions, and movement of sands by wave action (Gross,
These are not typical things that we think about daily, so it was interesting to take a step back and study these concepts from an academic and engineering standpoint. There are many reasons why these ideas are important. We read a long article by WM. A. Wulf detailing just how and why diversity is important, specifically in engineering. He discusses many points which I agree with.
What is the benefit of what you have learned? What is the cost of what you have learned? I would say those two articles have taught me more about the difference between the business schools and researches and how to evaluate the research. By providing a "fluffier" and manipulate data presented in a those point of views. Those articles have a lot a rich collection of articles and references that did provide a great support for the author’s arguments on both subjects to deliver a clear and convincing Journal to the reader.
. Introduction Terre Blanche et al (2006) accentuate that a literature review involves the process of identifying literature relevant to the topic of research, studying the literature and actually writing the review. We live in an age of information, and often what is required from the researcher is not more findings, but an ability to integrate and synthesize the overwhelmingly large volume of information already available on a topic. Skills of the kind needed to do a good literature survey are valued not only in academia, but also in the world of applied research, and these skills form the foundation of good research practice. Hart (1998), emphasize that a literature review is important because without it, researchers will not acquire an
According to Guzzo, et.al. (1987), meta-analysis is a quantitative form of literature review. Literature reviews are acknowledged as valuable contributions to the advancement of science. If done well, it helps researchers sum up where researches have been and where they need to go next. It identifies gaps in new knowledge and suggests new directions for future research.
Elbaum and Vaughn (2001), many facets of self are tempted to conglomerate the convenience. Doing so simplify the explanations, but increase some invalidate results. During self concept study, the acknowledgements of different facets of construct are important. By confining the focus on academic self-concept, a researcher can measure with better