Censorship of the internet restricts first and ninth amendment rights, but also gives a sense of security to many people. The argument against government monitoring has been used before in the past for the technology at the time. The government should be able to monitor someoneâ€™s web history and usage if it is deemed a threat. In the United States, citizens due have restriction about what they can do or say. Speech is limited in public places, government meetings, school, work, and when it can but others in danger.
Although being able to break-up with someone face to face is the best choice, but everything will become extremely impersonal. Young people also say things that they would never say to a person’s face in the social media. Audacity like this can leads to problems such as cyber bullying. This is because they never know the actual person exists behind the avatar which can encourage hostility and exclusionary behavior. In a nutshell, we should believe in technology and support it but only to an extent.
The power of social media retaliation and judgement has become astonishing. In reality, I could intentionally post specific opinions that could land me on no-fly list and cause quite a large uproar from antagonists in a matter of hours. Alter makes an agreeable point by saying we all have the right to disagree with each other, but not dismantle their personage. Being publicly proven wrong and having the chance to defend yourself, or reflect and apologize is all that should be preferred. Americans are fortunate to live in a country of free speech; however, it has created a society that nearly inhibits itself from the right which is exactly not what America stands for.
Modern technology is not always a good thing, sometimes it needs to be limited. Nobody wants to feel as if they are being watched. Truthfully, if they have social media accounts, they are being watched. Facebook’s entire business model revolves around them being able to share your information (Anderson 1). Typically, if companies were caught doing this there would be an outrage.
When scrolling through social media it is important that one only feed into some of the things that are put out into the world. People have so many opinions, and loosely throw them around as facts. We, as people have to learn to differentiate between facts and opinions because social media can contain a lot of biased information. From the few things that I learned from social media, I tried to apply them to my life. On social media there are a lot of rumors thrown around, and many people have opinions.
The Flip Side of Internet Fame In this article The Flip Side of Internet Fame by Jessica Bennett, there are many issues discussed in regards to the internet and how it can create instant fame and shame. This article talks about the many pros and cons with the Internet today and the effects it can cause. Although social sigma can be a useful deterrent, “the Internet is loose cannon,” says ethicist Jim Cohen of Fordham University School of Law in New York (Fawcett 579). Internet fame is causing more and more people to become isolated because of shame, rage, and death. The internet used to be a source for researching information, but today it is used as a battle field of hate and shame.
A. Attention getter: Everybody use social media these days like twitter, Facebook, snapchat and instagram. But the majority of these people do not know the risks of it. B. Audience Relevance: In the article on The Windows Club written by Arun Kumar in April 29, 2014, he tells us that over posting things in our profiles is very dangerous because people can use what you post to hurt you.
The general public who is generally not aware of psychometrics, should be careful about the conclusions they make when getting their results back. Every score should be tied to a specific prediction or description, it should not be just a label or a vague description that can apply to anyone (the Forer effect). The problem seems to be that people take free online personality test too seriously, as if they can only be one of 16 different types of people. There are many different versions of the MBTI, all which have different response options and description of each type. This might be one of the reasons why some people might not get the same score when they
The first, anonymity allows cyberbullies to prey on vuinerable peers without taking personal responsibility, just as they bring people together for constructive reasons, social media can connect dissatisfied, disgruntled, dislike, disliking, negative thoughts, and misguided people together, then they get logether and they might make a group because they have one mind, further fueling, negative attitudes and beliefs. Second, Social Media make us forget about the real world, most people prefer to spend time in Social Media, because they feel that Social Media has become a routine that they do everyday. Social Media not only make them busier than the real world, but Social Media succeeds in making them dependent or Social Media, and sometimes they forget to eat and bathe for being too passionate about Social Media, sometimes social media also make us smile by ourselves for seeing the news, or post from people who are in Social
Vast amounts of information is being spread around the world through social media today regardless of reliability. Without the government’s regulation, false ideas will be even more outspread. It is only through protection that we can try to block out offensive or misleading data. However, my only counter argument would be that we should educate ourselves well on whether something should be deemed as free or hate speech instead of constantly relying on the government to protect us. But to be on the safest side, both education and protection on freedom of speech should complement one