Rusle Methodology Essay

The Advantages of using RUSLE Method In calculating soil erosion.

The evaluation begins with background information on RUSLE's development and intended use, and on limitations to that use.

Here is how to put it in simple and basic understanding of the advantages of using RUSLE soil model, firstly it provides standard applicability and comparability of the results and methods, as the method has been adapted to and applied in many world region. Another added advantage is that the results are reasonable in terms of accessing risk of water erosion. Furthermore the algorithms can be implemented based on literature values or adapted to empirical/statistical data by using standard GIS software. This also proved that required data are usually easy

Later versions of the RUSLE model have expanded the technology to include the special needs of these users, including deposition calculations to allow for prediction of sediment yield. Throughout the effort, one of the primary commitments of RUSLE developers has been to expand and perfect the erosion-prediction technology without leaving the end-user behind. As the list of RUSLE users has expanded, so has the list of potential uses. The core use is still the estimation of long-term sheet-and-rill erosion on disturbed hillslopes. RUSLE now also provides estimates of the long-term average annual sediment yield from complex slope shapes and land uses, which should provide increased information on potential water-quality. RUSLE is best used for comparing management alternatives and land-use scenarios. The simplicity of RUSLE allows the conservationist to not only determine soil loss or sediment yield estimates for the producer or operator, but RUSLE can also serve as a valuable conservation teaching tool in explaining why the alternatives differ. Here is an