In honours work, students are required to work in group. Although this is a requirement throughout a students’ life. Joo (2017) found that women, as compared to men, enjoyed working in groups and this was due to the personality differences that were evident between the two genders. Joo further states that in third year, students should be masters of working in groups. Even though they will experience fatigue and other factors that will lead them into wanting to withdraw from group work contribution in their fourth year (or post graduate). Jones and Conway (2011) found that a lot of students found some fulfilment with working in groups. However, even though the students were fulfilled when working in groups there were some challenges that were experienced. The challenges that were experienced were 1) the students had difficulties reaching the same agreement when it came to carrying out tasks; 2) some students did not attend classes, therefore not bringing any contributions to their given assignments; and 3) some students were …show more content…
Thorely and Gregory add that one of the many problems about working in groups is the difficulty of expressing emotions, feelings and/or thoughts that are not easily described in words. There are many advantages and disadvantages of working in groups. According to Burke (2011) advantages include 1) that group tasks are more informative, 2) groups help individuals bring out their creative sides and 3) individuals tend to remember things better when they are discussed within a group setting. Disadvantage include 1) individuals might feel as if they are obliged to conform in groups, 2) an individual may dominate the discussion, 3) and there might be group members who decide that they will not contribute anything within the group, instead they are more dependent on
Those who are excluded often feel extreme pressure to be accepted back into the group in order to escape their uncomfortable isolation. • Groups also often develop their own distribution of roles, with both leaders and followers. Other group members play either inhibiting roles, rejecting new ideas, or innovating roles, actively developing such ideas. • Another risk of groupthink, according to Janis, can be observed in groups that work together over long periods of time. In addition to reduced efficiency, they also demonstrate reduced “reality testing”, i.e., a distorted sense of reality.
Another pro to working with other people is you have more people coming up with ideas. If you only have one person trying to come up with ideas or a solution to a problem, particularly a very complex one, odds are they are going to get something wrong or it will not be the best possible solution. If you have many people collaborating and working to solve a problem, more ideas will be produced and put together, so you will more than likely come up with a better solution. One of the negatives of working with other people is that things can get very heated if individuals disagree on ideas. In my Introduction to Engineering class I
In the natural world, there exists several different species of animals that live in societies led by a leader where all members thrive for the survival of the pack. Humans, in this context, are no different, but unlike these animals, we have a higher level of thought and self-awareness leading us to create societal rules for our communities which members must follow if the community is to prosper, leading to the formation of the hive mind, where all members, whether aware of the fact or not, fall into the group thought regardless of reality. In Doris Lessing’s article “Group Minds”, the author realistically discusses how even in western cultures where freedom of choice and democracy is implemented, group thinking manages to overpower
Group learning was imperative for my growth as an individual in a society where working with others is inevitable, and an essential ability. Knowing this, I am going to communicate this as much as I can to any students I encounter who are anti-group
Many would believe that a group leader should only facilitate groups pertaining to issues they have been trained in. This would not be an outrageous assumption but one point that must be remembered is that experience and training come from a base point. You cannot gain experience in something we never encounter. You must comfortable with going outside of our comfort box and putting yourself in a place for learning. Group leaders must be able to receive criticism and be open to self-examination if they hope to become competent and ethical leaders (Corey, et al., 2015).
With collaborative learning groups students can work together to solve a problem. The great benefit of a collaborative group is that there is more than one mind working on the problem and those minds can also explain the material in different ways. Our book says, “In short, the effective use of heterogeneous cooperative learning helps students grow academically, socially, and emotionally, and they enjoy doing it” (330).
As with any type of group work, disagreements are likely to surface; but that’s why I have experience managing large groups of people and dealing with problems and complicated ideas. If needed be, I will step up and make myself useful, whether it is in a classroom setting, a lab, or the workplace. I am also determined to work side-by-side with people who have the same fascination with academics and who want to see the same change in the world as I do; but first, I have to start by graduating from
Advantages and disadvantages of working within teams or groups with reference to relevant business communications theory This essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of working within teams or groups with reference to relevant business communications theory. We live in an age where effective and efficient communication is critical to ensure a high performing team or group. In most organisations working within teams or groups is extremely common.
One of my classes my first at NC State demonstrated this. In COS 100 there is a semester long group project. Having partners who care about their education was a welcome change of pace from previous experience and made the experience enjoyable. I experienced a similar situation in CH 101. Additionally, COS 100 makes the case that working together and communicating is the best way to advance the sciences.
What do you think are the benefits of working as a team over individual
Today, elementary school classrooms are commonly arranged in pods of desks, the better to foster group learning. Even subjects like math and creative writing are often taught as committee projects. In one fourth-grade classroom I visited in New York City, students engaged in group work were forbidden to ask a question unless every member of the group had the very same question'', the reader clearly can see that susan frusterad the fact that our socaity are more using extroverts insteed introvert ,.susan goes on explains that how now most of the instituations in society using what she calls the ''new groupthink , instead of working as individuals. she explains that ''‘’ But there’s a problem with this view. Research strongly suggests that people are more creative when they enjoy privacy and freedom from interruption.
Working with a group of members having diverse cultures, experiences, personalities and skills can result in difficulties. An unpopular choice I made was during my Social Studies 11 course, I was assigned a group report about Pierre Trudeau. I was faced with a dilemma, I had to choose between my friends who were not the most “hardworking” or complete strangers who I knew were efficient and astute. Realizing that my grades mattered I took the risk of teaming up with strangers. We were all strong students and wanted to do well on the report, but we didn’t know one another.
Collette O’Connell Writing and rhetoric 1 Collaborative manifesto reflection I will be the very first to admit that I absolutely despise group work. This is because I’m introverted and very stubborn, and together thise two qualities makes me extremely difficult to work with. I have a hard time listening to other people’s intentions when it comes to projects which often creates an unpleasant atmosphere. I also don’t compromise easily and often when I don’t get my way back out of a project or put forth as little effort as possible. It is for these reasons that group work has never really been something I enjoyed doing.
Motivation, perception and team work are all vital aspects of a functioning group no matter how big or small. Without these contributions, we cannot achieve the goals. Not only did I learn more about how it is to work in groups, but I also learned something about myself. In the end, the experiences I had, both with the group and individually, was worth it. It prepared me not only in college, but in my future career as well.
[47] argue that students report increased team skills as a result of cooperative learning. This is as Panitz [48] cites a number of benefits of cooperative learning for developing the interpersonal skills required for effective teamwork. As observed, there is broad empirical support for the central premise of cooperative learning, that cooperation is more effective than competition for promoting a range of positive learning outcomes. These results include enhanced academic achievement and a number of attitudinal outcomes. In addition, cooperative learning provides a natural environment in which to enhance interpersonal skills and there are rational arguments and evidence to show the effectiveness of cooperation in this