Advantages Of An Unwritten Constitution

1396 Words6 Pages
As we all know, a constitution is an arrangement of rules and laws on how a society governed by a higher law. There are countries that they have a single document as an unwritten constitution, such as the United Kingdom. . The constitution of the UK can be characteristic as an uncodified constitution, that shown some variety of sources and elements of the UK. The main sources are the Statutes such as the Magna Carta of 1215, Bill of Rights 1689, the Act of Settlement of 1701, and Laws and Customs of Parliament such as political conventions. Also case law is another source of the UK which constitutional materials decided by the experts of the constitution in a court who have written on the topic of Walter Bagehot and A.V Dicey, and the The Royal…show more content…
The UK constitution have an important part in Acts of Parliament and that which each place protected their plans, and many of those in the UK forward their own unique history backgrounds. On the one hand, there are many arguments which supporting the use of a written constitution. One argument is that the constitution express exposure and openness: matters which are significance ought to be arranged for all to manage it. A second argument is the vote based system, which indicates democracy. The present unwritten standards are controlled by the elected members and were fitting to the respectful and class-ridden society of the past however not to today 's equivalent society. Another argument is the sovereignty, which the primary role has to belong to the people for deciding for their constitution and not to the Parliament which is incomparable. Education: The existence of a single document is the proof that there is a written constitution. Therefore, in schools, there must be the use of our constitutional rules in an essential level, which may be particularly important in an increasingly multicultural society Generally speaking a codified constitution would make rules cleared for all to understand in all the political system by protecting their…show more content…
One argument is the Rigidity: Whatever is written is very difficult to be changed, especially in law. Codified Constitution is written down with rules and regulations and is very difficult to accept changes in an interchangeable modern environment. It’s not flexible to accept and ament all these changes that might occurred from time to time and be up to date. They are usually 'entrenched ', enjoying the protection of a higher or Supreme Court, and can only be repealed or amended by special provisions, beyond the ordinary legislative process. . So this constitution developed as outdated. On the other hand this can function as an advantage of a written constitution because the legal rules are written down and nobody can forget them. A second argument is the judicial tyranny. In a legal place the elected people are not the best always. For a good result, must there are the appropriate conditions. However, in this situation judges are not capable to conserve the codified constitution because they don’t have the appropriate eligibility in the society. The interpretation of law is a responsibility of the people, which have an impact on estimations of senior judges. Final, a written constitution in some ways functions as unnecessary material for reducing the power of government, in contrast with the promoting of democracy and strengthening that is a better way rather than. The limited power of
Open Document