The autocratic leadership style allows managers to make decisions alone without the input of subordinates. Managers possess total authority and impose their will on employees (Simpson, 2012:13). No one challenges the decisions of autocratic leaders. This leadership style benefits employees who require close supervision (Maseti and Gumede, 2011: 1481). Autocratic leadership style is slowly becoming outdated (Maseti and Gumede, 2011: 1481). Autocratic style is now only popular in public organizations where a leader sees himself as a commander who must not be challenged with regard to his authority and power. Autocratic leadership style is often seen as professional brutality and cruelty.
Authoritative leaders have the following characteristics:
• Autocratic leaders possess total authority and control,
• They keep their eyes on goal completion,
• Autocratic leaders want to make as many decisions as possible (Maseti and Gumede, 2011: 1481),
• Authoritative leaders adopt a dictatorial approach,
• Authoritative leaders are reluctant to delegate completely (Maseti
…show more content…
People may prefer the ability to be told what to do next. The autocratic leadership style may be very effective when times are stressful or when there is an emergency. This type of leadership limits debates and arguments. It allows employees to have one task, and that is to work, which could mean that employees master their tasks and become proficient enough to lift up the company. Other advantages of Autocratic leadership style include the following (Maseti and Gumede, 2011:1481):
• Authoritative Leaders possess total control,
• There is improved work output, efficiency and effectiveness due to intensive inspection,
• Authoritative style helps improve competitiveness in logistics and operations,
• There is fast decision making due to one centre of
Seth Marshall Professor: Messersmith Comp 2 2/22/16 Different Leadership Styles All people have different opinions on how a leader should handle things. Such as war, people, poverty, and even themselves. Both Machiavelli in “The qualities of the prince” talks about on how a prince is supposed to be a leader and that good leaders must learn not to be convenient or compassionate to keep stability. Lao Tzu in “Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching” believes in having a silent leader so the people will do what he wants them to do and fill like they are not being guided.
History has seen many strong leaders who have used their power for good but also abused their power for their personal harmful plans. Autocrats are rulers who influence everything in their region, they have been seen throughout the centuries. According to document 4, the characteristics of an autocrat state how they “control religious authorities, make laws, limit or control the power of nobles, and use armies to expand or consolidate borders under the ruler’s control.” This shows how they influence religion, and armies to extend the empire and change aspects of people's lives. Autocrats would have a desire for power which would have an impact on people's lives.
I chose to analyze Honey Daniels, the main character of the Homonym 2003 movie. Honey Daniels is a 22-year old Afro-Latina hip-hop dancer, who lives in New York, in the poor and though neighborhood of East Harlem. She threw her entire life into trying to achieve her dream of becoming a music video choreographer. To make a living, she works as a bartender at night and teaches hip-hop dancing during the day. In an environment where people face social problems such as poverty, domestic violence, and drug trade, she strongly encourages kids to attend hip-hop lessons at the youth center to keep them off the streets and out of trouble.
The way in which a leader selects their style of leadership is predominantly motivated by their underlying priorities and motives concerning the position at hand. These priorities are linked to the goals that the leader themselves wishes to accomplish in their position, but are often influenced by a variety of factors that are derived from two main concerns, the overall well-being of the institution under the leader’s administration and the approval of the people within that institution. The relationship between public approval and the well-being of the institution is often dichotomous in nature, which results in the leader having to make decisions that gravitate towards one side of the spectrum. This conflict between what is good for the institution
If people aren't optimistic, they're not going to make the sacrifices and do the work required to turn things around. It's a remarkably humble leadership style. To understand the leadership analysis at Ford, we will have to first understand the various types of leadership styles. 1. Autocratic Leadership: The autocratic leadership style allows managers to make decisions alone without the input of others.
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP Transformational Leadership is defined as leadership style focused on effecting revolutionary change in organizations through a commitment to the organization’s vision. (Sullivan & Decker, 2001) Transformational leaders are usually given higher position and are known for their charismatic sense and ability to develop high visions and regards in the work they do. They often give their best performances due to the low morale or self esteem Example: Steve Job, Bill Gates and Ratan Tata. As the existentialist rightly said, we always have a choice, in doing what we already have done or doing that which we have never done.
The organizational factors include: flexibility, responsibility, standards, rewards, clarity, and commitment. The research shows that the coercive and pacesetting styles have a negative correlations on organizational climate while the other four styles have a positive impact. Thus, except for unusual circumstances where coercive and pacesetting styles might be appropriate, leaders should normally use a combination of the authoritative, affiliative, democratic and coaching styles to achieve success. The best leaders will sense from their emotional intelligence when to use each of these styles. If you are an aspiring leader or a leader who wants to get to the next level of leadership excellence, Goleman’s article is a great primer on how to effectively use different leadership
(Cherry, 2016) Autocratic leaders normally settle on decisions in view of their thoughts, ideas and judgments and rarely acknowledge guidance or advice from followers. Autocratic leadership includes absolute, authoritarian control over a gathering. primary characteristics of autocratic leadership include, practically no contribution from members, group leaders manage all the work method, strategies and procedures, group members are infrequently trusted with choices or important assignments or tasks and lastly leaders settle on the choices and decisions. Autocratic leadership can be advantageous at times but there are additionally many occasions where this style can be problematic.
Jane’s leadership style can be defined as ‘Autocratic. Autocratic leaders, emphasis the
Therefore, management is important and very much needed. The Authoritarian, Democratic, and Laissez management style are all different and all effective depending on the situation. If one style or approach is not successful when resolving and issue, another style is available to eliminate a hostile situation from
This style of leadership can be advantageous in highly regulated lines of business, and it can be an efficient management style in companies that don 't require much creativity or innovation from employees. Bureaucratic leadership is one of the most prevalent forms of management today. Weber 's Ideal Bureaucracy is characterized by the following: ~Hierarchical Organization ~Delineated Lines Of Authority With Fixed Areas Of Activity ~Action
Mosadeghard (2003) had pointed out different styles of leadership. These styles are: autocratic, bureaucratic, laissez-faire, charismatic, democratic, participative, situational, transactional, and transformational leadership. Aioanei (2006) explained that in autocratic leadership style, organization is highly centralized. Leaders are more concerned with the tasks to be performed rather than developing relations. In this type of leadership employees are less involved and most of the decisions are made by the management.
Bass and Avolio (1993) pointed out that leadership style is based on behavior areas from laissez-fair (no leadership) to participative (take inputs from subordinate but ultimate decision making with the leader) through transactional leadership (which depends on reward system and punishments) to transformational leadership (which is based on inspiration and behavioral charisma) and ultimately Autocratic leadership (absolute power on decision making). The researcher selected above approach since it has been developed recently and efficiently demonstrated through research findings. The various components are further elaborated below; 1. Laissez-fair Style Laissez-fair leaders are characterized as an avoidant leader who may uninvolved with their subordinates. As per Mondy and Premeaux (1995), these leaders let group members to make all decisions.
This paper is going to encompass different leadership theories and their relevance to my own personal personality and method of leadership. There will be information on the advantages and disadvantages of the leadership theories and information on each including examples. The purpose of this paper is to view various kinds of leadership theories and apply them to a real-life scenario. Leadership Theories There are quite a few different leadership theories available for people to take information from and use in business settings and even personal settings.
Accountability also reinforces this trend. As employees feel challenged they also feel valued, which inspires them to push their own limits and reach new peaks of performance. Seeking to evaluate whether or not the leadership style implemented by Cristian Daes at Tecnoglass can be translated to other organizations, there is no question that it can be successfully implemented in any organization competing in any industry. Autocratic leadership may have some advantages, but it is applicable under very specific circumstances.