Bureaucracy Vs De Bureaucracy

RATIONALE
Bureaucracy in modern jargon was referred to the system of administrative govern by any huge association. Bureaucracy originally was created to lessen the burden of the administration however, according to Max Weber who was a German sociologist; he was saying that bureaucracy was the most efficient and rational way where the human activities can be planned. To some other people, bureaucracy was defined as a negative word which were too complex, inefficient, and too rigid. In other words, de-bureaucracy is a form decentralization where it involves the transfer of power and the function from the government to non- government organization where it include the private sector, where it sometimes referred as the civil society. Because of that, de-bureaucracy was created. De-bureaucracy means redesigning the process inside the government where it was crucial for the government to gain improvement in their service delivery. This effort was a way for the government to eliminate the bureaucracy system which was rigid and not suitable for the government who want to boost up the process of approval for related applications.
The implementation of de-bureaucracy was better than the bureaucracy

If we look closely on de-bureaucracy, we can see that there are three (3) rationales for having this in the administration system. Firstly, the rationale for having this system is governance participatory. Through the participatory of governance, it actually allows the better concern of mixed stakeholders and the sectors of society in the state affairs. It is actually good for the development of the administration because since it allows the involvement and participation of various stakeholders, it will increase and improve the administration economic indirectly besides attracting the foreign investor to invest since the administration is not rigid compare to the other administration whose still rely on the bureaucracy