Textual Evidence #1: ___On Document E it states that the GDP growth has raised education levels, higher living standards, and better nutrition due to the fact of less people. Therefore the children in china could bring in more revenue because the are better educated. Reasoning (explain what the above textual evidence means & how it supports your claim) ___The text above supports my claim because the one child policy was the causes of all the GDP growth and higher living standards. _ Textual Evidence #2: _____On Document E it also states that the costs for workers has dropped because they have fewer people to pay which means that the people get more money. Then if the people get more money that also may raise the GDP.
The lower the income a household has, the more stress it faces. Outstanding stress can have long-lasting negative effects on the hippocampus (1.). Hanson found that poor children had less gray matter within the hippocampus (5). Hanson concluded that “higher levels of chronic stress” could result in small hippocampal volumes into adulthood and other “early environment” factors, such as
Although both authors offer compelling arguments, “Waiting for Superman” contained a better argument because of its abundance of rhetorical strategies, whereas “Idiot Nation” contained some logical fallacies. For the most part, “Waiting for Superman” argues that even though the United States spends more than any country on education, we, as a country, are still lagging behind other nations in the quality of our education because of the inefficiency of our education system. He illustrates this
Carnegie stated that it is “much better this great irregularity than universal squalor” (Andrew Carnegie, “Wealth”). I believe that Carnegie contradicts himself with this statement, and I feel that it could be considered to create an ethical situation. Through his works he emphasizes the importance of sharing wealth for the greater good of society and to bridge the gap between the classes, but yet this statement seems to say that only a few are chosen to be wealthy while the rest of society is not. It in some ways undercuts the capabilities of the lower class. The giants of industrialism made their fortunes because of the labor of those worked for them.
The article informs that in 1953 the federal government reported an official poverty rate, this was the first time this was done. Gallaway’s article essentially describes the war on poverty. Gallaway argues that the war on poverty, unintentionally, creates slow economic growth, greater income inequality, and high poverty rates. The author broadly examines poverty and economic growth and as a result, it is concluded that those who are below the poverty line are no longer impacted by any economic growth. In 2010, 15.75 million of America’s 70 million children were classified as living in poverty.
People will take them more seriously and not look down on them like people did. Make up for Jim Crow laws Jim Crow laws were laws made up just to segregate places and discriminate against African Americans in the U.S. Make poor people richer African Americans make up for 27% of the poor people in America. If we gave some of them money, they would become richer, and their would be less people in poverty. It would also make America’s average citizens amount of money increase, it would seem that America is richer than before. (reduces economic gap between social classes).
Therefore, it is more realistic aiming for the middle-class in order to grant a larger fraction of the population to share the wealth leading to a larger fraction being able to achieve the dream. The new American Dream shows a more realistic outlook than the original. I conclude the American Dream has changed for the better. Society has morphed the ideas to fit new generations, understanding of the dream is accessible, and the dream is viable for the majority of individuals with labor. Although different people can perceive the American Dream differently, the gist is happiness.
Some believe that if there is more money distributed that it will help more people out of poverty. That is not necessarily the case because welfare is supposed to be a temporary government assistance to help people get back on there feet and not having to rely on it so much. Lawmakers and business officials believe that money should be earned more than given out, that’s why these programs that are a part of the welfare debate would probably help people get out of poverty described as the
By getting a better and more expand education, people can prepare themselves for better job opportunities and political interest. Raising minimum wage would be the ideal fix to economical inequality because it would index to the inflation; the cost of living would be affordable. The wealthy should get taxed more and get less tax breaks than the low-income families. By correcting political imbalanced, the lower class would be able to get their opinions heard and also get job security to protect the workers’. The Occupy Wall Street is a movement against social and economic inequality that has spoken up and fought for the people in the lower class.
Eventhough the government was corrupt, it aported to key businesses by the subsidy. This helped economy by making a higher production of goods. This subsidy also went to improve the infrastructure of the city. For example with railraods. When Harrison was chosen for the precidency he choosed to have the taxes over imported goods increased.