Disadvantages Of Judicial Precedent Analysis

1851 Words8 Pages

Advantages of judicial precedents 1. Consistency and Predictability There are six favourable circumstances of legal points of reference. Right off the bat, the Consistency and consistency. This consistency and consistency framework is giving the decency and equity as comparative cases will be dealt with and chosen in the same was as a past case. This framework enables legal counsellor to exhort their customers with some assurance as to their position and whether to prosecute a case 2. Flexibility The upsides of legal points of reference are adaptability. The judges in the higher court can create and refresh the law to assess changing social conditions. These choices may impact Parliament to present or refresh new statutory tenets …show more content…

In the event that a case comes up in court it can be changed in the event that it is a terrible result, however cases and point of reference can just change when a case comes to court. R v R 1991 could just change when the case came to court, however for quite a while people unmistakably did not trust assault inside marriage was adequate. Government can just pass such a large number of laws in its lifetime until the point when approaches and government change hands. It can 't put Acts of Parliament through sufficiently fast to settle the issues that judges with forces to evade point of reference and terrible cases could. The unbending methodology of the tenet is regularly censured for resoluteness. As courts drop down in the court chain of importance are bound to choices made by courts higher than them, any awful or unfair choices made would have a thump on influence, as they will undoubtedly tail them. Seeing as there are a large number of cases chose by court, it is frequently hard to discover significant past cases. Utilization of a wrong past choice could prompt an unfair choice being made in a last case. The law additionally winds up plainly mind boggling as already examined, when cases are recognized and another point of reference is framed. Regions of the law may require change yet the law is ease back to change as courts need to sit tight for a …show more content…

Judicial precedent is a source of law where the past decision has created a law for the judges to refer back for future guidance cases. The precedents are based upon the principle that stare the decisis or more commonly stare decisis is referred to a meaning of stand by decided matter. For the point that we find is the most common point of the judicial precedent. From this topic our group learn to know about how many courts that have in Malaysia. Other than that, we learn how the court control the judicial precedent cases that happen in our country and all others country because from this topic we also known more about judicial precedent and learn something to know and judicial is helps to maintain the interests of justice and many people have argued that judicial precedent is more to court and

Open Document