Legalization of euthanasia
The voluntary passive euthanasia should be legalized in Hong Kong. Since based on cost and effect, the advantage of legalization of euthanasia seems more than its drawbacks. According to the theory of utilitarian, its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects (Nathanson, unknow). For the euthanasia, it is likely beneficial to relief the burden of medical cost of government and patient’s family and help patient to relive. The research form the Food and Health Bureau (2008) reported that the population may increase over 24% percent from 2004 to 2033. The Annualized growth rate approximately 0.7%. Therefore, the public health expenditure may be increased by 276% which means
…show more content…
But if the euthanasia is agreed by the patient. It is the opponent still correct? In the previous case, the type of euthanasia is called involuntary passive euthanasia (IPE). This type of euthanasia is more likely a murder. Therefore, it may not be allowed. But of the patient agree to dead, this type of euthanasia is called voluntary euthanasia, which also fit to the theory Kantian. Kantian emphasizes on the rights of patient, and anatomy. According to Dan Brock, PhD, Director of the University Program in Ethics and Health at the Harvard Medical School, wrote in an article titled "Voluntary Active Euthanasia" in the Mar.-Apr. 1992 issue of The Hastings Center …show more content…
Since according to Hippocratic Oath (North, 2002) which is for physician to swear, by a number of healing gods, to uphold specific ethical standards. In Oath, writer have mentioned that “First do no harm” that means all physician may not be do anything that may hurt the patient including withdrawing treatment, taking action to end somebody’s life. And all health related workers in Hong Kong are asked to follow this rule. Base on the definition of VPE, applying it on patient seems to be infringe the principle. Also, the duty of physicians is more likely to save patient instead of stop patient to life ether patient is voluntary nor not. In order to allow the rule of Oath, VPE may not be allowed in Hong
Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia has been one of the most debated subjects in the past years. There are resilient advocates on both sides of the debate for and against physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. Advocates of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide believe it is a person ’s right to die when faced with terminal illness rather than suffer through to an unpleasant demise. Whereas, opponents contend that euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is not only equivalent of murder, but it is ethically and morally incorrect.
These code of ethics are extremely important and should always be in play when physician-assisted suicide is being talked about. I am pro life and I believe that everyone should live life to the fullest. But when you are in nonstop excruciating pain and there is no way of relief, then i truly think that physician assisted suicide
The possible legalization of euthanasia can cause a great disturbance in how people view life and death and the simplicity of how they would treat it. "There are many fairly severely handicapped people for whom a simple, affectionate life is possible." (Foot, p. 94) As demonstrated, the decision of terminating a person 's life is a very fragile and difficult one, emotionally and mentally. Nevertheless, it’s a choice we can make if it is passive euthanasia being expressed.
The patients should be allowed to have a physicians assisted suicide because of how much the patient suffers. A patient undergoes physical, emotional and psychological pain during treatments. Cathleen Kaveny from Gale database says, “The term euthanasia in general refers to a situation in which one party adopts a course of action with the intention of causing the death of a second party to alleviate suffering.” Euthanasia or assisted suicide is a way for a person who is suffering to end their suffering which is causing them emotional trauma. Some people believe in letting one naturally end their life but assisted suicide is a way to get rid of the pain in an easy way.
When a doctor administers the process or drugs that constitute voluntary active euthanasia, then that doctor acknowledges that it will end the individual’s life. Knowingly doing this, as a medical professional, is simply willingly killing an individual, which the social contract has always acknowledged as one of the worst acts an individual can commit. Intentional killing is always bad because it takes away everything that life entails, such as the pursuit of happiness and
Non-Voluntary is where one ends the life of person who cannot choose for themselves. Furthermore Thiroux and Krasemann, (2012) argues that people who perform mercy killing is not violation of the value of life because in most cases the people killed are not aware, mercy killing can also be justified, by the virtue ethics (Confucians) theory as it suggest that people suffering from an illness would not be a living eudaimon life, so ending someone’s life can be ethically justified. Confucians build moral judgement based on intuition rather than the reflection of moral principles. The arguments for and against euthanasia and mercy killings are complex; as both sides of the debate question the notions of morality. Although this essay will argue against euthanasia, as the quality of life is an ethically essential concept to consider, regardless of the motive murder is
Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide, is the act of permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured patients. This is never suggested by the caretaker rather than requested by the patient or their family. Few areas such as the Netherlands have already legalized this practice. This debate, as split as a fork in the road, is over whether or not this approach should be legalized worldwide on stances regarding religion, ethics, and self choice. I see this as being extremely unethical on both religious and social morality levels.
This essay suggest that active euthanasia should be supported. This essay elaborate the statement in three argument. Firstly, according to utilitarianism, active euthanasia can produces greatest net pleasure and happiness. Secondly, some philosopher Mary Anne Warren and Frances Kamm states that the practice of active euthanasia is kind and merciful, which allow people
Tulloch Gail from Edinburgh University Press said that Euthanasia can be categorized in two respects. First, if patients have requests for medical help injection for themselves, it is called Voluntary Euthanasia and did not a request from patients, it called Involuntary Euthanasia. Second, if the doctor injected into the patient died, it is called Active Euthanasia but if the doctor lets the patient died by themselves, it is called Passive Euthanasia (2005). However, Euthanasia is also illegal in some countries.
There are many forms of euthanasia. Whether it’s active or passive, voluntary or non-voluntary, most of these forms are illegal in almost every country in the world. Passive euthanasia is refusing treatment and allowing illness or injuries kill you, however active euthanasia is what I’m going to talk about today. It generally consists of injecting a lethal chemical composite dose into the bloodstream that is meant to end your life in the most painless way possible. We live in a world that has opposing viewpoints on this subject; there are those who view it as homicide, and others who view it as the most sincere form of human compassion.
Euthanasia is usually used to refer to active euthanasia, and in this sense, euthanasia is usually considered to be criminal homicide, but voluntary, passive euthanasia is widely non-criminal. Voluntary Euthanasia is conducted with the consent of the patient while Involuntary Euthanasia is conducted against the will of the patient. Beginning with the philosophical aspects of euthanasia we must first understand the importance of the sanctity of life. Human life is sacred because God made humankind in His own image, and that each individual human
As stated previously, there are two types of euthanasia which is used mostly by the whole world which is active euthanasia and passive euthanasia that. Active euthanasia is takes specific steps and end a person’s life by forces to kill a person with administration of drugs. However, passive euthanasia is withdrawal of life-sustaining medical treatment that is being withhold by the doctor. For example, disconnecting the feeding tube of the patients, switching off the life-support machines and using large doses of drug such as morphine on patient to control the pain that may cause fatal on respiratory systems.
In a few nations there is a divisive open discussion over the ethical, moral, and legitimate issues of euthanasia. The individuals who are against euthanasia may contend for the holiness of life, while defenders of euthanasia rights accentuate mitigating enduring, substantial respectability, determination toward oneself, and individual autonomy. Jurisdictions where euthanasia or supported suicide is legitimate incorporate the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Estonia, Albania, and the US states of Washington. CLASSIFICATION OF EUTHANASIA Euthanasia may be characterized consistent with if an individual
THE EUTHANASIA CONTROVERSY Summary Euthanasia has constantly been a heated debate amongst commentators, such as the likes of legal academics, medical practitioners and legislators for many years. Hence, the task of this essay is to discuss the different faces minted on both sides of the coin – should physicians and/or loved ones have the right to participate in active euthanasia? In order to do so, the essay will need to explore the arguments for and against legalizing euthanasia, specifically active euthanasia and subsequently provide a stand on whether or not it should be an accepted practice.
Have you ever imagined one of your loved ones suffering from a painful illness? Have you ever wanted that person to die and rest in peace? This is called Euthanasia, which means the termination of a patient’s life who is suffering from excruciating pain and a terminal disease. Euthanasia came from the Greek for good (“eu”) and death (“thanatos”) “good death”(Sklansky, (2001) p.5.) There are more than four types of euthanasia such as active euthanasia, which means that death is caused directly by another person by giving the patient a poisonous injection.