Marginal abatement cost (MAC) curve is a popular tool for assessing abatement options because it approaches the complex issue of cost-effective options in a simple and straightforward manner. MAC curve demonstrates graphically the cost effective way to reduce carbon emissions. Specifically, MAC curves contrast the marginal abatement cost (€/tCO2 eq.) on the y axis for varying amounts of emission reductions (thousand tCO2 eq.). These emission reductions are compared relative to the business as usual economic activity where no CO2 reduction policy will be implemented. A negative abatement cost indicates that the business as usual economic activity costs more than the implementation of an abatement policy. The popularity of MAC curves concept …show more content…
Expert-based MAC curves are developed based on assumptions made by experts and they present detailed technological options. Each bar represents an abatement option. The width of the bar represents the abatement potential of this abatement option and the height of the bar represents the cost for each year, relative to the business as usual economic activity. The width of all bars together reveals the total abatement potential. Furthermore, the left side of the curve demonstrates the cheapest abatement options and as we move to the right side the costs are being raised. Among the advantages of this type of MAC curve is the easy understanding, the simple representation of the technological options and the ability to account for marker distortions. On the other hand, the principal disadvantage is the simplification of the assumptions. Furthermore, other drawbacks of expert-based MAC curve are the inability to account for any possible interactions among the abatement options or for any other interactions, time uncertainty and inconsistency of business as usual emissions (Kesicki, …show more content…
The government and scientific communities in United Kingdom have also adopted the concept of expert-based MAC curve. Atomic Energy Authority (2008) published a report for Ecofys and Committee on Climate Change with MAC curves for industrial, domestic and non-domestic sectors. The Stationary Office (2008) has issued a report regarding UK’s emission targets towards 2050, the mitigation choices between CO2 and other GHG emissions and other guidelines regarding the optimal abatement strategy. They include expert-based MAC curves in their analysis for energy, residential, non-domestic buildings, industrial and transport sectors. The Department of Energy & Climate Change (2009a,b) constructed MAC curves for the entire UK economy including domestic, non-domestic, transport, industry, agriculture and wastes sectors. The target of the reports is to assess the mitigation policies under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) and those which are not included in the ETS and to propose the optimal mitigation strategy for United Kingdom. Johnson et al. (2009) constructed expert-based MAC curves for Mexico including agriculture and forestry, oil and gas, energy end-use, transport and electricity sectors. O’Brien et al. (2014) also used an expert-based MAC curve in order to evaluated abatement
The McGovern-Fraser Commission was created at the 1968 Democratic convention. This commission was formed in direct response to the demands for reform by minority groups. These groups sought better representation in the United States government. Although they could vote women, blacks, and young people rarely held positions in government. Those positions were mostly dominated by older white males.
7.3 is asking for a more specific result, it wants double the current global rate of improvement in energy efficiency, by the specific year of 2030. If energy efficiency becomes a more popular trend, people will start lowering their energy usage, and power plants for example, will see differences in the statistics they receive. The statistics should show that less energy is
Likewise, There seems to be a higher number of negative effects this proposal would have then is does positives. A small number of these include; a loss of ecosystem, a decline in tourism, environment and water pollution, and
McKibben suggests there is inefficient spending and mechanisms by individual consumers. For example, a lots carbon emissions and sewage caused by individual consumers is the result of their inability to use the latest technology. Also, consumers’ inability to respect the regulations of the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act contributes to environmental pollution. He supports this idea by saying “Our wasteful habits wouldn’t matter much if there were just few of us” (559). On the other hand Jensen argues by saying prejudicing powerless individuals instead of those who actually attain influential power in the system of government and policy making is one of the problems to mitigate environmental pollution.
Though colonists tried to work with the system of government set in place by their parent country, the began to flock towards a republican ideology. Although accepting of the English constitution and even supported its values, colonists came to worry about corruption. To them the monarchy represented power and with that power came corruption. In order to keep from being taken advantage of, the colonists would need more power in the government. Being colonists, they didn’t have the capability to influence Great Britain or to elect their own governors.
The penny has been used in many day to day scenarios and is recognized throughout history and even dates back to the Frankish Empire. However, many people see the penny as useless and not cost-effective. The reasoning behind this thinking is that the penny cost more to produce than its actual value, and they take up too much space and time. The cost of pennies is causing a lot of unwanted debt due to pricing for the materials.
Ultimately, major decisions on resource depletion and pollution have to be made by individuals. Scientific experts help the government and public to understand the importance of protecting the environment. On their part, government experts help in passing relevant laws, which commit all stakeholders into the environmental conservation efforts. Government experts also play a critical role in intervening to provide remedies in situations of environmental pollution. For example, the government can provide alternative sources of energy so that people do not cut trees to use as
When deforestation occurs, the wood of trees releases extensive amounts of carbon dioxide that only adds onto the greenhouse effect. An example of deforestation comes in the form of urbanization and the act to industrialize further within a country. In the last thirty years, India’s forest only covers 21 percent of the nation (23,716 Industrial Projects, 2016). Based on governmental information and data, lands are being curbed aside in order to organize commercial projects. These acts aren’t just happening in India.
Many laws, and restrictions have been passed over the last few decades, restricting manufactures to specific requirements for their emissions, vehicles in general, and even the gasoline that they run on, with requirements for detergents and such,. Unfortunately, it is claimed that these systems don’t have big enough impact on lowering the environmental problem, due to the amount of vehicles out there. Luckily, since electric vehicles are becoming more affordable, practical, and appealing, the amount of problems associated with the amount of claimed pollution will
1. Introduction: Carbon dioxide (CO2) is one of the important green house gases (GHGs) emitted in the atmosphere through various human and natural activities. The human activities include rapid industrialization and urbanization, deforestation, excessive use of fertilizers in agriculture, excessive use of fuels, papers and many other manmade resources whereas natural activities include volcano eruption, forest fires, earthquakes etc. Emission of GHGs in the atmosphere leads to global warming which is one of the primary reasons behind the atmospheric changes that affect the human life directly or indirectly. The consequences of global warming are extremely harsh seasons, untimely rains, extended summers and floods that results in human deaths, destruction of flora and fauna in addition to the huge economical losses.
These are some for the barriers and competitiveness issues which environmental regulation, taxes and policies encounter with the respective stakeholders during policy making and during policy implementation. Therefore, a balanced approach has to be achieved; and not to focus on avoiding environment damage only, while destroying industries and forgoing the opportunity of economic growth which creates tax base for government’s revenues. The policy or package will also have to guarantee that the polluter is charged or taxed accordingly and not the affected society at large to be bore the environmental damaging costs. According to Green Fiscal Commission 2009, there are two criteria’s which can be used to assess the effectiveness of environment taxes.
This article refers to the criteria for determining whether works would or would not be likely to have significant effects on the environment set out in Annex III to the EIA Directive, as amended. The criteria, as per Schedule 7 of the Planning and Development Regulations are grouped under three headings: (i) Characteristics of Proposed Development, (ii) Location of the Proposed Development and (iii) Characteristics of Potential Impacts. Consent authorities must have regard to these criteria in forming an opinion as to whether or not a sub-threshold development such as the proposed development, are likely to have significant effects on the environment. Environmental impact statement When an EIS is required it should formatted in a clear and precise way to assist assessment by the necessary parties. The report should be systematically organised (see figure 1) and have sections on: • The Proposed Development • The Existing
Thus, an unpopular tax on a product that produces negative externalities, such as car use that creates environmental damage, may be avoided due to the fact that the government is afraid of losing support from the
In today’s day and age, climate change is becoming a hot topic. Whether one is an advocate for change or is just skeptical of the entire belief, there is no doubt that this concept is relevant to the modern society. In an article by Robert J. Antonio titled, “Climate Change and Society by John Urry," he evaluates the research of scientist and breaks down the complexities of climate change for the audience. In a separate article by Ashokankur Datta and E. Somanathan titled, “Climate Policy and Innovation in the Absence of Commitment”, the authors evaluate policies concerning the pricing of adapting to more emission-free, healthier technology for the environment. These two articles will be compared and contrasted based on reasons why the public
Environmental impact assessment is referred to as a policy and management tool for both planning and decision-making (Glasson et al, 2005). This essay will be divided into four sections. The first section