Collaborative advantage is concerned with the creation of interaction between two or more organization to achieve company's own objectives, the key point about this that it focuses on outputs of collaboration that could not have been achieved except through collaborating with a good partner. While collaborative inertia, I can say it is a concept to describe poor collaboration performance with slow progresses which lead to failure of achieving anything.
The most obvious role to achieve collaborative advantage between two companies taking in consideration that both should realize the fact that they are not separate companies and the two partners should never accept part of their business being run by an outsider, and to share risks, responsibilities
…show more content…
Surely, direct versus indirect communication will definitely Effect Company's performance to manage the multicultural team process involves a series of important type. Informal time spent face to face, especially in the first stage of the project, has been found to be exceptionally valuable in understanding members preferences and assumption, facilitating both leader to member as well as member to member communication throughout the rest of the project. As demonstrated here, this initial face to face time may be especially critical if there are differences among members on preferences for power and responsibility relationships. A key intervention for managing the multicultural team process is for the leader to act as a cultural interpreter. However, the more the other member also assumes this role the fewer cultural misunderstanding will occur and the more the team can focus on its task at hand. A cultural interpreter identifies situations in which two or more members have different frames of reference, preferences, and assumptions guiding their contributions, but the differences go unrecognized and the assumed similarity leads to misunderstandings. Thus a good interpreter intervenes explicit by making the team members aware of underlying reasons leading to the communication problems before the team moves on its discussions. (Mendenhall, …show more content…
Some organizations might not be enthusiastic to join though a government or collaboration feels they can be beneficial. Collaboration would like to embrace an organization which for example might help in new global markets or is advanced in new technology. Collaboration has to keep the organizations it already has as well as find opportunities where other useful organizations might join. One issue to be dealt with is “community involvement” which of course is a demand from governments. The issue becomes in defining the community and its representative who must feel at ease and comfortable to deal with the different managers. Members and representations keep changing as organizations reorganize and change job roles. However; it is important to find ways of keeping those who have become experienced and know how things are done so a new member may be fresh blood but collaborations need to see that there must be continuity and new members must believe in and understand what are the basic principles and paths already taken. Documents are kept to brief the new comes. But the new members need to collaborate actively and this is the role of the managers to see that new members feel a part of the
This assignment will provide a critical account of collaborative working (thereafter CW) and its impact on service user experiences (thereafter SUE). A critique of the literature will contextualise the rational for choosing the subject and its relevance to current practice. The paper will also, explore the strength and weakness CW has on SUE. The reason for this research is due to the growing demand for primary care services and the need to reduce the National Health Service (NHS) expenses in the UK (Cameron, et al., 2013); Cameron, Bostock, & Lart, 2014).
This structure will remain mainly functional but with a more flexible and adaptable system that will allow the company to focus on a project as well as the day to day running of the business. The company is expanding, they have added two new directors to the company’s structure to support this expansion. Kathryn Hannah will be promoted to Director of Organizational Development. Kathryn will be responsible for the change process and she will continue to run the HR department but will take the burden of directive control away from Laura Bolton, leaving Laura to focus on the purchasing department. Sidra Aktar will be joining the company as the new Marketing Director.
This structure will still remain mainly functional but with a more flexible and adaptable system that will allow the company to focus on a project as well as the day to day running of the business. The company is expanding, they have added two new directors to the company’s structure to support this expansion. Kathryn Hannah will be promoted to Director of Organizational Development. Kathryn will be responsible for the change process and she will continue to run the HR department but will take the burden of directive control away from Laura Bolton, leaving Laura to focus on the purchasing department. Sidra Aktar will be joining the company as the new Marketing Director.
Advantages and disadvantages of working within teams or groups with reference to relevant business communications theory This essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of working within teams or groups with reference to relevant business communications theory. We live in an age where effective and efficient communication is critical to ensure a high performing team or group. In most organisations working within teams or groups is extremely common.
Collaborative Working Collaborative working as partnership between community or voluntary organisations. An organisation may work with one other partner organisation or may belong to a wider consortium. “Collaborative working describes joint working by two or more organisations in order to better fulfil their purposes, while remaining as separate organisations” (CollaborationNI). Organisations can work together in a spectrum of ways from informal networks to joint delivery of projects. In light of the case study, Brathay Trust work collaboratively to deliver the P.A.Y.E.S programme to the vulnerable young people in the care home with various implemented activities.
Group: Group: A group is a collection of people or individuals who coordinate their individual efforts. They could be working independently but at some juncture their efforts are coordinated. Team: Team: A team is a group of people who share common goals and challenges and they work harmoniously to achieve their set goals. They are bonded mutually to the goals and challenges and eventually they assume collective accountability (The Business Journals, 2013).
CONCEPT 7: THE IMPORTANCE OF A COLLABORATION IN NURSING CARE This concept is taken from Block 6, Module 9 which is entitled as “Lessons in collaboration”. Collaboration is a working practice whereby individuals work together to a common purpose to achieve business benefit (Aiim.org). Collaboration can also be referred to as cooperation or partnership. 7.1
Since management of controls is a complex area, mental health, organizational leaders can implement an educational panel who will further institute cultural competency training which will identify their own cultural biases, assumptions, along with the implication these behaviors have our the workplace and productivity. This academic method will be implemented in a formative learning environment such as workshops and activities which improve relationship within the workplace culture and unite the workforces, build leaders, while increasing awareness of diversity throughout the workplace. This competitive training will allow leaders can also discover best practices, multicultural communications. From an employee perspective employees to engage
Stakeholder Analysis The answer to whether this partnership will be advantageous to both entities will hugely depend on how each of the management teams learn to understand, value and cater for various stakeholders involved. From an analytical perspective, a stakeholder approach can assist in promoting analysis of how the company fits into its larger environment and how its standard
There are some conditions which are supposed to be followed to make team effective. The goal of the organization should be clearly defined. Every individual in a team should know his or her roles and responsibilities, there should be proper system that promotes effective communication, and there should be clear standards for excellent
I notice that each member has a different characteristic that shapes the team dynamic, which is the unseen forces that strongly influence how a team reacts, performs, or solve problems (William, 2013). Learning from the extensive interaction in the CP course and my professional experiences as HR Professional, I know that a leader should understand her team members’ characteristics, particularly their strengths, weaknesses, personalities, and build a same perspective/vision to facilitate team effectiveness. This initiative will enable each member to contribute their talent, develop a collective agreement to solve problems and achieve the team’s goal effectively. Having an effective work group is very critical for solving the challenge/problems, particularly on how we could deliver a robust recommendation for the client by applying diverse knowledge gained from the MBA course and how we could get reliable data/information from Greenwich Library and multiple
There are four general theoretical perspectives (Slavin, 1995) that have guided research on co-operative learning, namely, (a) motivational, (b) social cohesion, (c) cognitive-developmental and (d) cognitive-elaboration. 1. Motivational Perspective : Motivational perspectives on co-operative learning focus primarily on the reward or goal structures under which students operate (Slavin, 1977, 1983a, 1995). The motivational perspective presumes that task motivation is the single most powerful part of the learning process, proclaiming that the other processes such as planning and helping are determined by individuals’ motivated self-interest. Motivational researchers focus especially on the reward or goal structure under which students operate,
This gets proved when our group member worked together. For intercultural communication, a fundamental problem have to do with is misunderstanding. Because all my group members are from different counties, the culture backgrounds are also quite different. When we started doing our group project, because of the different culture background, the common pre-understanding within our group member is not so much. However, the common pre-understanding is quite important for us to do our group project.
In the first place, diversity at workplace values differently between the past and the present. According to an article, “…the unemployment rate among African Americans is disproportionately high compared to whites” (The Challenge of Diversity). Additionally, in line with “How Diversity Makes Us Smarter”, “Diversity enhances creativity” (Phillips). This is significant because diversity at workplace in the past were mostly consisted of white males. Not that many women were able to work due to men’s superiority.
I will contribute to the creation of a collaborative culture that is focused on student learning; by bring my academic experience, passion for education, multicultural education experience, cultural competence experience, and the cultural responsive teaching to the creation of a collaborative culture that is focused on student learning. However, I have four things I will contribute to student learning of a collaborative culture: 1. Focus on a clear outcome: Create collaborative projects that will focus on improving student success and making the school a better place for all children to learn, while maintaining the image of a professional community. Teachers will pursue a clear, shared purpose, engage in collaborative activity, and accept