Advantages Of Collaborative Collaboration

3027 Words13 Pages

Collaborative advantage is concerned with the creation of interaction between two or more organization to achieve company's own objectives, the key point about this that it focuses on outputs of collaboration that could not have been achieved except through collaborating with a good partner. While collaborative inertia, I can say it is a concept to describe poor collaboration performance with slow progresses which lead to failure of achieving anything.
The most obvious role to achieve collaborative advantage between two companies taking in consideration that both should realize the fact that they are not separate companies and the two partners should never accept part of their business being run by an outsider, and to share risks, responsibilities …show more content…

Surely, direct versus indirect communication will definitely Effect Company's performance to manage the multicultural team process involves a series of important type. Informal time spent face to face, especially in the first stage of the project, has been found to be exceptionally valuable in understanding members preferences and assumption, facilitating both leader to member as well as member to member communication throughout the rest of the project. As demonstrated here, this initial face to face time may be especially critical if there are differences among members on preferences for power and responsibility relationships. A key intervention for managing the multicultural team process is for the leader to act as a cultural interpreter. However, the more the other member also assumes this role the fewer cultural misunderstanding will occur and the more the team can focus on its task at hand. A cultural interpreter identifies situations in which two or more members have different frames of reference, preferences, and assumptions guiding their contributions, but the differences go unrecognized and the assumed similarity leads to misunderstandings. Thus a good interpreter intervenes explicit by making the team members aware of underlying reasons leading to the communication problems before the team moves on its discussions. (Mendenhall, …show more content…

Some organizations might not be enthusiastic to join though a government or collaboration feels they can be beneficial. Collaboration would like to embrace an organization which for example might help in new global markets or is advanced in new technology. Collaboration has to keep the organizations it already has as well as find opportunities where other useful organizations might join. One issue to be dealt with is “community involvement” which of course is a demand from governments. The issue becomes in defining the community and its representative who must feel at ease and comfortable to deal with the different managers. Members and representations keep changing as organizations reorganize and change job roles. However; it is important to find ways of keeping those who have become experienced and know how things are done so a new member may be fresh blood but collaborations need to see that there must be continuity and new members must believe in and understand what are the basic principles and paths already taken. Documents are kept to brief the new comes. But the new members need to collaborate actively and this is the role of the managers to see that new members feel a part of the

Open Document