The North had a distinct advantage over the South with the population “2.5 times larger than that of the South, 22,300,000 to 9,100,000”. (American Eras 3) The population did help win the war for the North, but the South would not make the fight easy. Heavy losses recorded on both sides throughout the war caused sadness. Stephen Crane accurately uses Civil War medical practices, field conditions, and new weapons to show one can overcome loneliness and fear in The Red Badge of Courage. Stephen Crane was influenced by his surroundings to write about the Civil War.
For every five people in the North, there were only two in the South, even including the vast number of slaves which made up a third of the South’s population. The Union army was far larger than the Confederate army, and not only due to the larger white population in the North. Unlike the Confederates, the Union army recruited many former slaves, and by the end of the war “the Union army included 178,895 colored soldiers-roughly five times the number of men in Lee’s army when he surrendered at Appomattox”(Donald). These former slaves
They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people” (Aleb, 2016), is an unacceptable comment coming from a presidential hopeful. Although FDR had an outspoken personality, his opinion on politics was significantly more reserved than that of Donald trumps. This one reason why I believe FDR was a great leader as well as a great president. He was able to maintain a strong balance between saying a lot and saying too much.
[full citation needed] One reason was the lessons learnt in the war, namely the need to complement heavy cavalry with plenty of light, faster horse, as well as increasing the cavalry share when engaging with enemies with more powerful mounted forces. It was also inevitable that, as the Roman Republic acquired an overseas empire and the Roman army now campaigned entirely outside Italy, the best non-Italian cavalry would be enlisted in increasing numbers, including (in addition to Numidians) Gallic, Spanish and Thracian horse. [full citation needed] Towards the end of the republic and the beginning of the Roman Empire, the Roman cavalry itself was rendered less and less of a powerful force, with Rome meeting its cavalry needs with auxiliary, allied cavalry
For example, the North had a larger population and an industrialized society. On the other hand, the South had better generals, the advantage of knowing the fighting terrain, and only needed to fight defensively. All of these advantages played a major role in the eventual outcome of the war. Likewise, the North’s railroad system and industry gave them better equipment and transportation. The population of the North stayed larger than the South’s throughout the war.
Both Reagan 's successes and failures stemmed from his character and style of political leadership. Reagan 's optimism, geniality, and gracious nature appealed to his opponents as well as his followers. President Reagan 's leadership was his certainty about simple problems and faith in simple solutions was the source of his political strength as well as some of his failures. He projected simple certainty and displayed confidence, but his actions and policies, in important ways, belied his public image. Reagan 's broad vision and clear direction made his political ideals appealing.
His humble beginnings and small homeland instilled in him an ambition to prevail over these shortcomings. This ambition, though not a fault in and of itself, was possibly his downfall and controlled most of his life decisions. For example, Bonaparte made valuable connections with important leaders of the French revolution by befriending them quickly leading to a promotion. “I no longer consider myself a mere general, but a man called upon to decide the fate of the people.” Napoleon declared this soon after one of his earliest victories phrasing it almost as if he’d been chosen upon by god like the royalty that preceded him. But revolutionary leaders don’t lead revolutions because they were selected by a divine being, they lead because their country is in dire need of change.
He won the battle not because of superior odds, but as a result of the speech that invigorated a true fighting spirit of his men. A peasant with nothing to live for and no will to fight will not perform nearly as well as a man filled with dignity and honor. King Henry made all of his comrades feel as though they weren’t anything, but dignified warriors. His speech was able to compose this great of an impact with his speech with reason that his words are backed up by his past actions. A marvelous king can rule righteously, a great king can also love and be loved by his
This type of leadership is the process where a leader engages his followers by raising their level of motivation through empowerment, learning, trust, and communication. After summarizing both movies above we can see that this type of leadership applies to both movies. This style of leadership came to light in just the second scene in Lincoln when we saw President Lincoln taking the time to speak to Soldiers before they heading out to battle. He showed his compassion towards his Soldiers and the civilians populace and was willing to take time to sit and talk to them about their issues or concerns. Coach Boone did not have Soldiers, but his Soldiers were his football players.
Herbert Hoover made a great first impression on the country, and was majorly supportive of it in many ways. Even during the Great Depression, he tried to help the needy. However, he had multiple different problems besides poverty that involved the economy, which he didn’t aid very much. After he was happily elected out of office by a longshot, he took his loss childlike, and spoke harshly of the government. Even through the painful times, concerning his job and the country, America’s 31st President remained loving and compassionate to many