Advantages Of The South In The Civil War
Nether side North or South was fully equipped for the war and how long it would last. The North had many advantage over the South including resources, leadership, and military strategies these advantage played a major role in the war. With the lack of some of advantage the South struggled to fight an uneven war. A main disadvantage the South had was resources.
Compared to the South the North had greater resources such as population, industrial and agriculture ability, transportation networking, and financial resources when compared to the South. The North had “ 2.1 million men who fought for the Union” (Goldfield, The American Journey, 407) this equaled about half of the North’s men of eligible age to fight. A majority of the Unions military about 200,000 men where African Americans, a hearty amount of which was ex slaves. An additional amount of soldiers came from Irish and German immigrates as well as northern men themselves from all classes including common labors
…show more content…
Confederate president Jefferson Davis’s previous career as secretary of war qualified him for running the Confederacy, but some of his characteristics hindered his leadership ability. He was extremely smart but interacted awkwardly with people. He often associated compromise with weakness and differing opinions as personal attacks. In contrast to Davis, Abraham Lincoln won the support of his people by “persevering the importance of the Union”. He also created support in his speeches where he used pathos to create an emotional connection to his people by referring to “the family man”. Lincoln handle disagreement much differently than Davis by defusing the tension with humor and the personal image of himself he projected made it easy for common people to relate to him. He won the heart of his soldiers by visiting the battlefields and talking with the soldiers. The easy way he talked to soldiers earned him the name “Old
Ulysses S. Grant's Leadership During The Civil War
690 Words | 3 PagesJust a couple months after Lincoln was inaugurated the Civil War broke out putting Lincoln on the spot to Unify the Confederacy and the Union to eventually end slavery all together. At first doubts about Abraham Lincoln’s ability to lead arose. He seemed to not have much experience in politics or military leadership. Conversely, though he proved to be patient but strong and was a great war planner. Though struggles with finding a good general to lead the union was still at hand, Lincoln’s decisions were good until the end of the war.
Compare And Contrast Lincoln And Davis
678 Words | 3 PagesThe success of a nation relies heavily on its leader’s ability to fortify weaknesses and capitalize on strengths within the country. During the time known as the American Civil War, two opposing coalition arose to battle for their ideals and beliefs; The Union, led by Abraham Lincoln, was comprised of mostly northernmost states, while the Confederacy, led by Jefferson Davis, was mostly formed from southern states. Although the two leaders were born as fellow citizens of the same country, each of them exhibited significant differences from the other. Through the Civil War, both Lincoln and Davis displayed their strength and weakness in their ability to lead a nation during a time of conflict. When referring to the topic of political leadership,
Doris Goodwin's 'Leadership In Turbulent Times'
700 Words | 3 PagesLincoln said, “I am a patient man” “but it may as well be understood, once and for all, that I shall not surrender this game” (Goodwin 216). Being a patient leader is hard to come by and Lincoln being such an understanding man is a great factor for having a successful political leadership. Lincoln was a hard but generous man, he “offered the rebellious states a last chance to end the war” (Goodwin 217). Lincoln had good leadership but is taking the patient way to
Essay On Lincoln's Response To The Dred Scott Decision
1253 Words | 6 PagesBefore he fought for the Senate seat in Illinois and before he was elected President of the United States of America, Abraham Lincoln was merely a man from Illinois who cultivated a set of beliefs and morals that would guide him and his country through one of the most difficult times in its history. One of the most revered presidents in American history, Lincoln emancipated southern slaves and lead his country through a civil war. It was his responses to the Dred Scott case and Senator Douglas and his debates throughout the 1850’s that helped shape the type of president, he would become. Lincoln recognized the burgeoning divide in American society just prior to the Lincoln-Douglas debates and addressed this disunion in order to garner the attention
Essay On Why The North Won The Civil War
489 Words | 2 PagesThe North had beaten the South in the Civil War. The North won the war for many reasons; they had some advantages over the South, a great leader, and the desire to win. The North and South fought many battles before the Civil War ended. Each battle had a different outcome and some encouraging the fight and some ended in despair.
Why Did The North Win The Civil War
261 Words | 2 PagesThe South on the other hand , had less men and guns and ammo in fact there were 22 million people North and only 9 million South and out of that 9 million only 5.5 were white . One main reason the Civil War broke out was that the North and South states couldn’t agree on slavery . The South did want slavery , but the North did not . In total 620,000 died in the Civil War in four years that’s how many people died . Many African
Civil War: Advantages Of The Union And The Confederate States
299 Words | 2 PagesThe Union also had four times the population of the CSA, which meant a larger number of possible enlistees for war. In addition, almost seventy percent of the former nation’s railroads were located
Thomas Jefferson's Code Of Honesty Analysis
519 Words | 3 PagesMany public figures attract a lot of attention to themselves by having integrity, or lack thereof. The sixteenth president of the United States, Abraham Lincoln, became known as “Honest Abe” because as a lawyer he never defended cases that required him to ignore his conscience (Kennedy 406). Along with other redeeming qualities, his uprightness made him a good leader in the public’s eye. Additionally, Lincoln had a very successful career, winning the popular and electoral votes in 1860, drawing an end to the Civil War, and famously abolishing slavery (Wilson). However, some might say he was not so virtuous when it came to the Civil War.
Differences Between North And South Civil War
715 Words | 3 PagesDuring the antebellum period, the huge differences existed between the North and the South in many ways. To begin with, the economy of the North once was similar to that of the South; however, as the U.S. started to develop economically, the North became more industrialized. With the advent of the new technologies, factories in the North could produce more things than before to supply the strong market demand of the nation. On the contrary, the South still was a farming region where farmers mainly worded on plantations to grow cotton. To make more profits, the wealthy plantation owners in the South started to force slaves to labor on the plantations.
Why Was Abraham Lincoln Effective Leadership Essay
1615 Words | 7 PagesYet, his past and only active military experience brands him as little more than a comedian. The Black Hawk war was probably a topic Mr. Lincoln preferred only when there was need for humor. Effective leadership was not about winning points with the people or the supporters. It was about delivering results. The task was to unite a nation that was broken in half over the deplorable practice of slavery.
Who Was Abraham Lincoln A Great Commander-In-Chief
287 Words | 2 PagesHe wanted generals that would attack and destroy the Confederate army, and at the same time be able to work together as a team. Lincoln never strayed from his duties as president, even under extreme international, military, and political pressure. Lincoln
Advantages Of Why Did The North Win The Civil War
502 Words | 3 PagesThe South didn’t use slaves as soldiers but the North recruited black men and included the free slaves after the emancipation proclamation was approved. The South did as well after the emancipation proclamation but it was not as effective as it was for the North because they didn’t have that support from other world powers. If England or France supported the south then we would’ve maybe seen a different outcome because of a greater pressure to make peace but because they supported the North, it helped them in ultimately winning the civil
Compare And Contrast The North And South Before The Civil War
214 Words | 1 PagesNorth and South were heavily dependent on each other during the years before the Civil War. The South produced materials (especially tobacco and cotton) which were America 's chief export goods. The southern states exported around 80% of the goods that brought cash into the American economy. However, there was a price for all that wealth.
Why The South Lost The Civil War Essay
909 Words | 4 PagesOne, in particular, would be the North’s abundance of soldiers. Edwin C. Bearss claims, “The South lost the Civil War because of a number of factors. It was inherently weaker in the various essentials to win a military victory in the North. The north had a population of more than twenty-two million people to the South’s nine and a half million of whom four and a half million were slaves”. With the North having more people to go to war with, it was clear their army would be able to defeat the South.
Paleolithic Leadership Analysis
966 Words | 4 PagesWar shaped President Abraham Lincoln as well, exposing his talent for mediation and unification. The violently divisive conditions of the Civil War not only disclosed his pragmatic capabilities, but also invoked powerful oration such as the Gettysburg Address and his second inaugural address. Thus, hardship not only revealed Lincoln’s broad talent of allying opposing groups with one another, but also exposed secondary talents such as oration and organization. Still, many argue that though hardships positively influenced leaders such as Washington and Lincoln, Nixon and Buchanan evidence that hardship can
More about Advantages Of The South In The Civil War
Ulysses S. Grant's Leadership During The Civil War
690 Words | 3 PagesCompare And Contrast Lincoln And Davis
678 Words | 3 PagesDoris Goodwin's 'Leadership In Turbulent Times'
700 Words | 3 PagesEssay On Lincoln's Response To The Dred Scott Decision
1253 Words | 6 PagesEssay On Why The North Won The Civil War
489 Words | 2 PagesWhy Did The North Win The Civil War
261 Words | 2 PagesCivil War: Advantages Of The Union And The Confederate States
299 Words | 2 PagesThomas Jefferson's Code Of Honesty Analysis
519 Words | 3 PagesDifferences Between North And South Civil War
715 Words | 3 PagesWhy Was Abraham Lincoln Effective Leadership Essay
1615 Words | 7 PagesWho Was Abraham Lincoln A Great Commander-In-Chief
287 Words | 2 PagesAdvantages Of Why Did The North Win The Civil War
502 Words | 3 PagesCompare And Contrast The North And South Before The Civil War
214 Words | 1 PagesWhy The South Lost The Civil War Essay
909 Words | 4 PagesPaleolithic Leadership Analysis
966 Words | 4 Pages