In the story, The Adventure of the Speckled Band by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle Sherlock Holmes had believed that doctors make the greatest criminals. Holmes himself said "when a doctor does go wrong, he is the first of criminals. He has nerve and he has knowledge." Dr. Roylott had certainly gotten away with the murder of his stepdaughter Julia, and if it weren't for Helen Stoner being afraid for her life, Dr. Roylott would've probably gotten away with her murder as well. However, Helen called Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson to help solve her sisters murder, and not only did they solve her murder, but in an ironic twist, Dr. Roylott was also murdered by his own weapon. Holmes concluded that doctors make the greatest criminals because they know about different medications and poisons, they take an oath, and they have the power to get …show more content…
Roylott did in fact get away with the murder of Julia. Even though her body was tested for poison, the coroner was unable to find a cause of death because Dr. Roylott was smart enough to know which toxins would be found in the bloodstream, and which ones would be undetected. Since it is a doctors responsibility to know about all kinds of medications and poisons, a doctor would know how to use those substances to cause harm. As is the case with the Speckled Band. Dr. Roylott was smart enough to know what toxic poison could kill someone, but also be undetected.
Second, there are, of course, many doctors in today's society who are considered criminals as well. Since doctors have the advantage of having knowledge and power, they are able to commit various different crimes, and some are never caught. Some doctors sell prescriptions, while others perform certain procedures that can leave people mutilated, crippled, and even dead. Some doctors just get too greedy and greed is what gets them caught. Greed is what got Dr. Roylott. He wanted all of the money that was left to Julia and Helen, so he came up with a plan to get rid of
During his stay with the workers he was able to witness the injuries and the consequences of these injuries in the worker’s lives, including physical and mental suffering. While in San Miguel observing the medical work being done there Holmes heard many different contexts implying that doctors don’t know anything. Along with Holmes I found this surprising because doctors are generally there to help and medical care is normally appreciated (pg. 112). Holmes had many questions and concerns with why the laborers felt this way, and addresses his understanding of the answers through the continuation of the health of his companions from chapter 4. Through these health care system experiences Holmes has taken interest in changing the opinions of the doctors on migrant farm laborers and the opinion of the laborers on the doctors.
This represented the power and position of forensic pathology in the criminal justice system, which the Crown and defence rely on, but can end in incarcerations of innocent individuals, as shown in John’s case. In this investigation, rather than having evidence presented by a forensic pathologist, Dr. Dietrich was a clinical pathologist who was trained to determine causes of disease in living patients and not to perform post-mortem examinations to identify the causes of death. John’s trial was proceeded by an unqualified pathologist without training in the area required to provide medical evidence in criminal trials, which lead to misdiagnoses and John’s wrongful conviction. As well, rather than approaching evidence with an open mind “without preconceptions or presumptions about abuse”, Dr. Dietrich had initially believed Maxine’s death was a homicide, therefore demonstrating his bias and lean towards evidence supporting his view instead of the truthful information
The ease at which they were able to sell the body in addition to the high price is what set the horrible events to follow. Knox was a certified doctor and surgeon, but opted to teach instead of practice medicine.
This led to major breakthroughs in the medical world and allowed scientists to experiment effects of toxins and cures. “If the whole profession is doing it, how can you call it 'unprofessional conduct'?" (Skloot, 134) Skloot wrote this book to unveil the injustices that the Lacks family and many other African-Americans went through. The key passage shows that many medical professionals used the “everyone else is doing it” defense to justify their unethical behavior.
A team famous investigators by the names of Sherlock Holmes and Dr.Watson were brought in by authorities to solve the
The Story of the Murderous Doctor “More than 700,000 people die in hospitals each year in the U.S.” (Shmerling). Although it is doctors’ job to save lives, deaths still occur. When in a hospital, the patient’s life lies in the doctor’s hands. Most doctors do everything in their power to make sure that their patients stay alive, of course, there are exceptions for everything. In this case, the patient’s life who ends up in the hands of Michael Swango might not be so lucky.
For example, in cases of violations of ethical guidelines, doctors were rarely caught because the rules were not strongly enforced. Skloot comments, “Like many doctors of his era, TeLinde often used patients from the public wards for research, usually without their knowledge. Many scientists believed that since patients were treated for free in the public wards, it was fair to use them as research subjects as a form of payment”. White doctors were often not opposed to poor treatment of the minorities because they believe the research done would be beneficial to the scientific advancement around the world. Even if patients would take corrupt doctors to court, the judge usually ruled in favor of the medical professional.
Seven people died. The cause of these deaths is Cyanide laced Tylenol, but will the person responsible for the rime ever be caught? Over 30 million bottles of Tylenol were taken off shelves after an unknown killer put lethal amounts of Cyanide into the Tylenol capsules. This caused 7 people to die. It has been over 17 years and still, no one has been found.
As astounding actor Mike Judge once said, “It 's amazing what we can get away with and what we can 't.” You can get away with so many things, just like the doctor that treated Henrietta Lacks. The doctors in early 1900s did not require much schooling to become doctors. Henrietta went to John Hopkins hospital to see the only gynecologist, Howard Jones. Jones examined her, took notes of her growing tumor, took a sample of her tumor and sent her home. Howard Jones sent her cells off to a laboratory, and that was when they discovered something marvelous.
According to newspapers at that time,“the Nuremberg Code didn’t seem to apply to the United States”(Skloot 133). It was unsettling to many at that time that American doctors felt above the rules. this allowed Skloot to emphasise our emotions of fear of doctors above the law and what the could have done. In the modern world one should have not feared the men who were supposed to heal them. One example of doctors who felt above the law was Dr. TeLinde.
A man that murdered his son received a harsh and fair punishment, unlike the doctors that not only killed Candace, but taunted her and brought her down. For 70 minutes this horror scene went down, which not only shows that cruelty of some doctors, but the fact they doctors do murder with knowledge. These two doctors did not even have licenses. What else do doctors have the power to
If a person told someone that whatever they told them would not leave the room, would that person be able to keep that secret? What if they told them that an innocent person got put in jail for a crime they did not commit? Chuck Klosterman begins to explain that a patient had headaches and that an innocent person was convicted of a serious crime that the patient had committed. The headaches then resolved after getting the truth out to the doctor. The way the doctor responds to the situation is another way of determining what type of person they are, or what resolution of the situation will best respect the rights of both the doctor and the patient.
Doctors, one side of the coin they are viewed as the ones that can cure the sick with their knowledge, the ones that are supposed to help them get better. The other side they are feared and are avoided at all cost by some. Doctors have this bad reputation about them because sometimes they don’t even tell their patients what is wrong with them. Or the patients themselves don’t even question the doctors because they went to school and have a prestigious piece of paper. In “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” by Rebecca Skloot, she describes benevolent deception, which doctors had no trouble of doing in the mid-century, as the doctors keeping their patients in the dark.
In the case of Donald (Dax) Cowart, one can determine that the conflict is between Beneficence and Autonomy. The doctors were morally right in choosing to treat Donald despite his autonomy by using the principle of beneficence. Firstly, doctors entire training is about how to save lives, so in a sense it is something they are morally obligated to do. Patients go to hospital in the hopes of being treated.
“The Adventure of the Speckled Band” Argumentative Essay In “The Adventure of the Speckled Band” by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Dr. Roylott was bitten by the swamp adder, forcing Sherlock Holmes to feel guilty. For numerous reasons, Sherlock Holmes could not have been directly responsible for Dr. Roylott’s death. In the beginning, Sherlock Holmes was paid to protect Helen, along with himself.