To begin with, people whose family have a lower income and they may not be able to go to college, can use affirmative action to still be allowed to go to college and exploit their talents and still be able to live a standard good life. “Now more than ever, the continued use of affirmative action is needed to address existing discrimination, to break down barriers and to ensure that all individuals have an equal opportunity to demonstrate their talents and abilities” (Affirmative Action, 1) In the quote, it explains how affirmative action helps more people be able to get allowed into schools that would otherwise not, and now have a chance to show their talents and abilities to the world. That although they came from a low income family or a one-parented family, they still have an equal chance to show how they can make a difference in the United States. “These children will grow up to be the adults who drive the …show more content…
In the quote, it demonstrates that if they “eliminated consideration of race,” or in other words, they took out the part of affirmative action due to the race of the person, this would increase whites admission rates by 1.5% which is practically nothing. If they left it the same however, they would have much more people attempting to major in something and start their career. Even if these minorities don’t make it all the way and fail college, giving every equal a chance to prove their talents is more than anyone should ask for, after that, it’s up to them to pursue their careers in
Hunter Johnson CRN 10774 Term Paper Political Actors are not just any elected officials, but they can be any organization, group, or person that has an influence on any political issue. In the Texas affirmative action case, many political actors are involved. Edward Blum runs a group who is working on ending affirmative action. He was along side Abigail Fisher helping her though this case. Another political actor was Justice Clarence Thomas.
The author was simply taking ownership or deflecting but simply realizing that a privilege exist. In most cases when one attempts to discuss a topic such as privilege, it is reduced to a “tit for tat” scenario. You mention “white privilege” so I must mention “affirmative action”. The reality is the two are not connected
Grutter V. Bollinger Research Paper 2 Abstract Barbara Grutter (plaintiff) which is a resident of Michigan who was denied admissions into the University of Michigan Law School. Lee Bollinger (defendant) was president of the University of Michigan. Grutter filed this suit because the University had discriminated against the basis of race. Supreme Court ruled that the use of affirmative action in school admissions is constitutional if it treats race as some factor.
Considering this, he is stating America is a white man's country and every other race has no voice in this country. However, even with the ratification of the 13th,14th, and 15th Amendments, discrimination and prejudice still remain strong.
“Affirmative Action may not be a perfect system, but there should be no doubt that it has endangered many successes. It has opened the doors of America’s most elite educational institutions to minority students, granting them unprecedented opportunities” (Ogletree 12). Thanks to Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson a policy that prohibits employment and education discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin, and sex is offered today to those who suffer from said discriminations (A Brief History). Affirmative action has opened abundant openings for minorities, allowing the cycle of going to college to be passed down generations and provided job opportunities that otherwise would not be considered by most. Affirmative
Hello, your honor. We are gathered here today because of the injustice between the whites and the African Americans in schools all across the Southern United States. We as a community seek equal opportunities between the races in schools and in everyday life. In the 14th amendment it states that, “No state shall make or enforce any laws which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens.” By segregating whites and blacks and having to make another law school for African Americans go against this amendment as there are not equal opportunities between them.
Blacks economic freedom was taken from them solely because of their skin color. In a graduation speech, a young African American said,” Why should I thrive hard and acquire all the constituents of a man if the prevailing genius of the land admit me not as such, or but in an inferior degree! Pardon me if I feel insignificant and weak... Where are my prospects? To what shall I turn my hand?
They claim, “...students of color are showing that they feel disconnected from their respective schools, that implicit yet institutionalized racism creates emotional distance between them and their white peers and faculty. Being a black student on a predominantly white campus certainly, doesn’t guarantee that the student will develop mental-health issues. However, various studies suggest that perceived or actual discrimination can make it hard for students of color to engage with their campus in the way that their white peers do.” This explains how students sometimes feel like they don’t get enough support from their universities and this is dangerous because it can lead that student to drop out of school.
Ira Katznelson is the author of When Affirmative Action Was White, a historical analysis of the history of affirmative action and racial inequality in the United States of America. Katznelson takes a definitive approach to the history of legislation and inequalities and prepares the reader initially with his title. Katznelson’s argumentative position and approach to the title of his book makes the reader question about affirmative action for white Americans, but in reality what Katznelson means by his title, When Affirmative Action Was White, is more based on the social programs and federal grant opportunities that were created and provided to Americans during the Roosevelt and Truman administration. Katznelson argument encompasses historical
The fear is that without this policy, diversity will not always happen if left up to chance. It is true that schools and other organizations have discriminated against women and people of other race. This problem created an unfair advantage for males of the superior race. Supporters also charge that without affirmative action African Americans would have a more difficult process of being admitted into prestigious and predominately white universities (Hopkins, 2010). Affirmative Action allows minorities to reflect different areas of study and work that otherwise would have never been considered.
Martha Peraza SOC 3340 Inequality in Education California State University, Bakersfield Abstract In the United States, there exists a gap in equality for different demographics of students. The factors contributing to educational disadvantages include socioeconomic struggles, gender of students, language or culture, and particularly for the scope of this paper, race.
Although many affirmative action programs include the members of other racial and ethnic groups”. Rankine is able to pull together the underlying implications of affirmative action on page 13 (Section 1) where the narrator is describing an interaction between (presumably) two women who attended the same college. The other woman (who is white) states that “she, her father, her grandfather, and you, all attended the same college”, here we as readers are given an immediate understanding of the reason for this conversation (Rankine 13). The white woman set a trap, disguising the lunch meeting as a friendly conversation whose form and perspective immediately change with the introduction of college admissions into the conversation. The narrator then goes on to explain that “She wanted her son to go there as well, but because of affirmative action or minority something–she is not sure what they are calling it these days … her son wasn’t accepted” (Rankine 13).
Affirmative action was created to provide a path to employment for the “members of groups that have historically suffered discriminatory treatment.” (224). The American Government was the first to ensue actions in efforts to set the example of employment equality for all other private and public organizations. A. Philip Randolph provided the birth to affirmative action by threatening to have a protest rally in Washington D.C.. In fear of the possible repercussions, President Roosevelt put forth the first policy statement in response to discrimination.
Throughout many of the affirmative action legal cases, one of the main arguments from proponents is that it is necessary in order to right the wrongs of past racial discrimination. Some say that affirmative action is justified because even though white applicants may be more qualified, this is only because they did not face the same hardships as their minority counterparts (Rachels, Ethics, 1973). Many argue if we do not integrate disadvantaged minorities into mainstream social institutions, they will continue to suffer the discrimination that has plagued our country for centuries and that this is detrimental to not only the minorities but also society as a whole (Anderson, 2002, 1270–71). However, the debate has recently shifted to the benefits of diversity in the classroom which the Supreme Court has affirmed as being a positive thing
Affirmative action was implemented as a way to set the standard for common business practices regarding fair employment practices for all. This standard was enforced on a government level for any entities within the government and working for the government (contractors, etc.). The idea was the government would set the standard and others would fall in line. The plan worked on some level and created the Secretary of Labor. Affirmative action was an efficient way to bring the rest of America up-to-speed, and had a definitive purpose when created.