A Second Look at the Affordable Care Act David E. Mann, ABA American Military University POLS210 Abstract Since the passing of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), twenty-eight states have either filed joint or individual lawsuits to strike down the PPACA. This document will examine a few key elements that the President of the United States must take into consideration when reviewing the act and moving forward to either ratify the act, replace the act, or leave the act as it is. Topics that will be presented will include; the current issues being debated, two competing thoughts on how to fix the ACA, an evaluation of the preferred solution, and finally the responsibility of each level of government. Patient …show more content…
(Chaikind, Copeland, Redhead, & Staman). Supporters of the act contest that the requirement to purchase health insurance is economic in nature because it regulates how an individual participates in the health care market, through insurance or otherwise. The inverse is stated by opponents that Congress cannot have the power to require a private citizen to have insurance and because there is a tax penalty attached to it it is unconstitutional. (Chaikind, Copeland, Redhead, & …show more content…
One being the need for a digitized information system in which the data is used to assess what’s working and what’s not more intelligently. This would allow for there to be an assessment of quality or quantity of treatment. (Health care reform debate in the United States, n.d.). Mayo Clinic President and CEO, Denis Cortese describes the four “pillars” of success in reforming the United States health care system by: Focus on value; Pay for and align incentives with value; Cover everyone; Establish mechanisms for improving the healthcare service delivery system over the long-term, which is the primary means through which value would be improved (Health care reform debate in the United States, n.d.). David Leonhardt of the New York Times describes another assessment in which many ailments are treated differently, however have the same outcome. The point in his article is that different treatments cost different amounts, sometimes very significantly different, yet both get the same result. By doing comparative effectiveness research, patients can get the quality care they deserve but at a much cheaper cost. (Health care reform debate in the United States,
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
“Healthcare Reform 101,” written by Rick Panning (2014), is a wonderful article that describes, in an easy-to-understand language, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, signed into law March 23, 2010. The main goal of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was to provide affordable, quality healthcare to Americans while simultaneously reducing some of the country’s economic problems. Two areas will be covered throughout this paper. The first section will include a summary of the major points and highlights of Panning’s (2014) article, including an introduction to the ACA, goals of the signed legislation, provided coverage, and downfalls of the current healthcare system. The second part will be comprised of a professional
One of the author’s reasoning for how taking away ACA would affect Medicaid is back in 2016 legislation tried to step away from it, but former President Barack Obama repealed it because could eventually affect the lives of millions of people. The authors also cover how ACA changed Medicaid for the better, for example creating a program for just children’s coverage, inventing a new method to determine eligibility, and even creating new benefit options for families and small businesses. The author describes how the new Presidential administration can repeal or alter Medicaid through Section 1115. The authors main argument is that by repealing ACA would eliminate the Medicaid system which in turn will allow millions of people to be
The affordable care act is a United States statue signed into law by President Obama in March of 2010. It represents the most significant improvement to the U.S. healthcare system since 1965 with the addition of Medicare and Medicaid. Also known and commonly referred to as Obamacare, it was enacted to increase the affordability and quality of health insurance, diminish the rate of the uninsured by expanding public and private insurance coverage while reducing the cost of healthcare for individuals and the government. This law will require Hospitals and doctors to reconstruct financial practices along side with technologically and clinically to advance better outcomes, reduce cost and improve methods of accessibility.
During a joint session with Congress on February 24, 2009, President Obama said, "So let there be no doubt: Healthcare reform cannot wait, it must not wait, and it will not wait another year” (8). Almost thirteen months later, after a process of revisions and being passed through the United States Government, President Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Companies that are religious or have religious interest are contesting parts of the Affordable Care Act. For example, Hobby Lobby sued the government so that they “would not have to provide coverage for contraceptives for its employees” under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (Strine, 2015, p. 91). They ultimately won their case in Supreme Court. The decision the Supreme Court made in the Hobby Lobby case supported the need for an insurance exchange in the open market.
The Affordable Care Act: Bad For Some, Great For Millions For sometime, many US citizens have not had the resources to acquire an adequate health insurance plan. Although faced by many oppositions, the US government has found a solution, The Affordable Care Act. The Affordable Care Act, also known as “Obamacare”, is a US healthcare reform law that focuses mainly on providing more Americans with access to an affordable health insurance. The Affordable Care Act is said to expand the affordability, quality, and availability of private and public health insurance through consumer protections, regulations, subsidies, taxes, insurance exchanges, and other reforms. Signed into law by President Obama in March 2010, hence the nickname “Obamacare”, the
Moreover, the act, in relevance to various Health and Human Services initiatives, such as the Blue Button, will encourage third parties to provide various add-on services, including secure storage of data solutions for personalized health records, APIs and platforms of health that facilitate personalized, mobile devices. Such mandates will probably stimulate innovation in bio-informatics and biometric as regulators aspire to cut Medicare costs via bundled payments and motivate protocolization by providers of care. Protocolization refers to the adoption of evidence-based, standardized and accepted treatment protocols. It is an inherent concept in the ACA and connected incentives for Accountable and Care Organizations (ACOs) and incentivized reimbursement plans in the post-ACA Medicare setting. The consequences of protocolization are reduced discretion for payers, patients and physicians in selecting treatment alternatives, but with increased control over outcomes of treatment and experience of cost.
It is a law that is still under debate to this day because of religious/moral rights, costs, etc. However because of this law many Americans have health insurance now and are able to seek treatment and services that they had no access to
It works to make health insurance more affordable for Americans, and essentially, improve the healthcare system in the US. But, many people oppose this healthcare act because they believe that the government should not force people to get insured, and pay a penalty for not doing so. However, one has to realise that although they may not have
(Aaron, Burtless, 2014) Another argument against Obamacare for many is the law goes against the constitution. Many argue that the law goes too far by mandating Americans buy something they don’t want or need. Besides mandating that everyone have insurance or pay a tax the law also requires business to provide insurance coverage to allow access to contraceptives regardless of their religious beliefs. This has people arguing that Obamacare violates their first amendment rights.
Background The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is officially referred to as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was enacted into law on March 23, 2010. It is estimated that prior to the enactment of the ACA, 44% or 81 million people between the ages 19-64 were either uninsured or underinsured in the United States (Schoen, Doty, Robertson, & Collins, 2011). The populations most likely to be uninsured or underinsured are individuals with earning between 133-200 % below the established federal poverty guidelines (Schoen et al., 2011). Consequently, 80% of individuals with earning under $20,000-$39,999 were uninsured or underinsured (Schoen et al., 2011).
Obamacare is really called The Affordable Care Act and it was created to increase health insurance quality and to make sure that anyone including some poor people can afford it. Also, Obamacare requires them to cover for pre-existing conditions. In other people’s opinions they think that some poor people don’t have enough money to pay for health care because they’re not spending it wisely. Some politicians are trying to replace Obamacare with a new medical plan. I think they still should have Obamacare because poor and sick people can afford it and if we get rid of it then those poor people can’t have health care.
Before the Affordable Care Act was put into work, over 45 million Americans were uninsured. The Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, was then made to help those who were uninsured. It allowed people with financial struggles with the same opportunity as everyone else to have a healthcare plan. Even though the law was passed in 2010, it took a full year of back and forth to get it passed in the Senate. Obamacare may help you get coverage, but charge you an annual fee if you don’t have one.
This law which was passed requires that all the individuals in the US should take the health insurance or pay a penalty tax; employers with 50 or more employees to provide health care coverage to its employees or face a tax penalty thereafter; it establishes insurance exchanges through which individuals and most families will receive tax payer funded premium subsidies; it requires the expansion of Medicare by raising %716 billion for medical care; it imposed 21 additional taxes on the health insurance plans, medical devices, businesses and families at a cost of $1.1 trillion. The estimated cost to achieve this project according to CBO was put to be $2 trillion which was far more than the presidents promise to keep the cost down at $1 trillion (republicans,
The Affordable Care Act, (ACA) often referred to as Obamacare, was signed into law March 23rd, 2010 and has quickly become a nightmare to millions of citizens nationwide. While there were fortunate people who benefited from the heavily subsidized and affordable healthcare that was not readily available before ACA was passed, many more people found that their once affordable healthcare was no longer an option due to new ACA requirements (how so?). ACA was designed to extend insurance benefits to roughly 30 million uninsured Americans. The Obama administration aimed to extend Medicaid and provide federal subsidies so lower and middle-class Americans could afford to buy private insurance. This act alone forced millions of Americans out of their