Can we use identity and citizenship to explain Africa’s conflicts? (How best can we explain it?)
For many decades Africa has encountered many wars and conflicts with majority of them being intrastate. Nations have either been under threat, in the midst of civil war or on the road to negotiating peace. The effects that come with armed conflicts have been damaging to nation’s growth and security (Akokpari, 2008: 92). This essay is going to argue that the question of citizenship and what it means to be a citizen is closely associated with African conflict and therefore one of the ways to explain its causes. However this does not reject other causes that are a result of African conflict. I will start by briefly explaining the concept of citizenship
…show more content…
He mentions the Banyarwanda community; a cultural group of people who live in Rwanda as well as outside its borders of Uganda and Congo. They are the largest ethnic group in East Africa. Those that live outside Rwanda are known as the cultural diaspora and are divided into nationals, migrants and refugees. Under British colonialism indigenous people were said to belong to an ethnic group while non-indigenous belonged to races and so colonialism was “the dividing line” (Mamdani, 2002: 494) in determining who is indigenous. The political crisis in the Luwero Triangle is best explained through the lens of citizenship. In the Buganda region of Uganda citizenship rights were associated with whoever resided on the land. The issues of rights became a crisis when the Baganda ranchlords felt the government was giving preference to the non-indigenous Banyarwanda. This led to the citizenship requirement being changed from residence to ancestry which meant that land could only be claimed if an ancestral history could be established. Many of the Banyarwanda lost their claims to land that they had previously owned (Mamdani, 2002: …show more content…
Individuals are excluded from citizenship because of colonial history that laid the foundation for post-colonial tactics. Linked to that is citizenship discrimination that the state actively does which strips many of their rights showing how the power to define who is a citizen and who is not can shape the politics of solidarity and conflict in Africa. This however, does not deny that there are other factors that contribute to causes of African conflict but rather puts emphasis on identity and citizenship as having a significant role.
Word count: 1 833
References
1. Adejumobi, S. 2001. Citizenship, Rights, and the problem of conflicts and civil wars in Africa. Human Rights Quarterly. Vol. 23, No. 1: 148-170.
2. Akokpari, J. 2008. You Dont Belong Here: Citizenship, the State and African Conflicts. Reflections on Ivory Coast. Roots of African conflict: The causes and costs: 88-105.
3. Mamdani, M. 2002. African states, citizenship and war. International Affairs. Vol. 78, No 3:
In doing so, Semley calls into question what it means to be “free and French,” as Touissant Louverture famously said while delivering his Constitution in Le Cap in 1801. Citizenship is more than legal rights and the cultural aspect is just as meritorious as any legal procedure. Semley’s book follows a roughly chronological outline of events in the French empire, using case studies on different figures and groups of people in different areas of the empire. Semley weaves together a cohesive narrative by connecting the individuals and places in these stories to create a cascading effect that makes it easy to understand the gradual evolution of citizenship and its relationship to people of color.
In Chapter 1 and 2 of “Creating Black Americans,” author Nell Irvin Painter addresses an imperative issue in which African history and the lives of Africans are often dismissed (2) and continue to be perceived in a negative light (1). This book gives the author the chance to revive the history of Africa, being this a sacred place to provide readers with a “history of their own.” (Painter 4) The issue that Africans were depicted in a negative light impacted various artworks and educational settings in the 19th and early 20th century. For instance, in educational settings, many students were exposed to the Eurocentric Western learning which its depiction of Africa were not only biased, but racist as well.
According to A Denunciation of European Imperialism, spoken by Nnamdi Azikiwe in 1949, he sees the idea of imperialism as a crime against humanity, because it enables any part of the human race which is armed with modern scientific knowledge to rule less fortunate sections of mankind, because the weaker force is unable to resist rule( Document 8). As Azikiwe explains, Imperialism is a crime against humanity that enables the less fortunate people to be ruled without their consent by the people with more power. This demonstrates that imperialism was harmful because it states how imperialism was such a demanding force and how it left many Africans with no power over their countries and themselves. In the Golden Coast Leader, The Editorial Notes state, Indirect rule is a system by which an alien government is enabled to place a Native state in the hollow of its hands and in such a way that it has only to pull wires to start a chief and his people dancing to its piping( Document 10). The Editorial Notes point out that many of the African leaders and Chiefs were being controlled by European political officers.
Africa In World Politics: Engaging a Changing Global Order by John Harbenson and Donald Rothchild gives an analysis of how Africa has changed from being a European ruled colonial nation to a nation that it creating a name for itself in the global sphere. Beginning with Africa’s politics during the colonial era through the present. The book provides not only details about Africa but also how the changing world has affected African politics. The main focus of this book is to show the growth Africa has had since its time of colonization. Africa has grown as the world has changed although it has had to deal with internal conflicts and demands for political change due to its authoritarian regimes.
Citizenship is a status given by a government to some or all of its people. Being a citizen means not only meeting certain responsibilities, but also enjoying certain rights. In the U.S. today, many of our governmental institutions are based on concepts of the Ancient World. Citizenship in the United States resembles the concepts of citizenship in both Ancient Athens and Ancient Rome. Ancient Athens believed that participating in government and making the city-state work was a part of being a good citizen.
In Basil Davidson’s video, “Different but Equal”, Davidson examines ancient Africa, and how Africans were perceived in ancient and modern times. Davidson discusses pre-colonized Africa and its history, and how racism prevailed in the past and in modern day. By discussing early civilizations, as well as modern day perspectives, Davidson allows the viewer to have expansive information on how individuals view Africans and their culture. In Davidson’s video, he discusses how people in the past have viewed Africa and African culture, and how that relates to our perception of Africa in modern times.
The Lecture 1 document in this module refers to British sociologist, T. H. Marshal’s distinction between three different types of citizenships; civil, political and social (Marshall, 1968). This meant that civil citizenship allowed Black people to walk, talk, have opinions and own property
The Eurocentric views of whiteness being directly correlated to superiority and civilization was used a tool to exploit native peoples while legalizing entitlement to lands that have already been discovered (Miller, 2010, p.87). The process of land dispossession had a profound negative impact on Native peoples. Their identity became outlined by colonial institutions rather than from their own definition. The conflicting methods of defining identity is integral to Kauanui’s Hawaiian Blood: Colonialism and the Politics of Sovereignty and Indigeneity. In her work, she describes how indigenous Hawaiians themselves have historically determined their identity through genealogy and a system of common descent.
The founding father, Thomas Jefferson, is known for his intellect and historical impact. Credited as the lead author of the Declaration of Independence and an opposer of slavery, his views on the black race originally came as a shock to me. In “Thomas Jefferson on the African Race,” Jefferson states that in order to compare the races they must be tested in America by the white standard. In doing this, Jefferson cements whiteness as default and perpetuates an ideology that has not been overturned to this day. Thomas Jefferson claims that it would be “unfair” to examine black people in Africa and that they must be tested in America for the results to have any significance.
Nationalism has too often been dismissed as an irrational creed due to its association with disastrous results over the decades. But undeniably, it is a dominating force in contemporary international politics. It is important to understand nationalism if we want to understand global political developments. Many books have been written on this subject, but David Miller’s On Nationality stands out. This book takes on a distinctive approach to the study of nationalism, rendering it one of a kind in this field.
The world cannot appreciate the African identity unless they don 't embrace it themselves. It is also a message for non-Africans to remember their privileged histories and acknowledge its part in their social position in the present world as the issues of identity can not be addressed unless they look at the African community from the lens of their
In The Legacy, Basil Davidson discusses the legacies of colonialism in Africa and gives an insight on modern Africa and the successes and downfalls that it possesses. Moreover, he states that many of the issues seen in modern day Africa are not new and have their roots in the long years of European colonialism that profoundly shaped and continues to shape the continent. Throughout the documentary, various themes regarding postcolonial Africa are mentioned in depth. A few of the themes that Davidson highlights are modernization, ethnicism, corruption, inequality, dictatorship, and neocolonialism.
He contends that when an individual or group is denied its major requirement for identity, security, acknowledgment or equivalent investment inside of the general public, extended conflict is inescapable. To determine such conflict, it is essential that needs that are debilitated be distinguished and along these lines rebuilding of connections or the social framework happen in a way that needs of all people and groups are suited (Burton John, 1991,p82). For instance, this model can be helpful in the cases of African conflicts, for example, that of Darfur, Burundi, Dr Congo and Rwanda conflicts, where there are limitations on opportunity and support of its nationals in political and monetary
People who share a common history should create an independent nation. In Cecil Rhodes “Confession of Faith,” the imperialist author his views and preferences on nationalism. During this time period, Africa was in a state where it could be taken over by Britain, due to the lack of a strong government. Rhodes envisions this opportunity “to seize every opportunity of acquiring more territory.” This act is the result of imperialism, but not nationalism.
The purpose of this paper is to analyse the positive and negative impacts of colonialism. Key words: - Colonialism, Religion, Culture, Civilization, Conflict INTRODUCTION Things Fall Apart was published in 1958 just two years before Nigeria’s independence from the British’s rule in 1960. Achebe, who was born in 1930, had experienced colonialism in his country. The novel depicts the pre-colonial and early colonial Nigerian society.