Capital Punishment Must Be Abolished
Capital punishment has been used by most civilizations and societies as a punishment for criminals. Nowadays, there are 140 known countries that have abolished the death penalty as a form of punishment(Amnesty 4) but there are 57 countries that are still carrying out capital punishment such as The USA, Iran, Iraq (Info1). However, the effectiveness of the capital punishment, in order to prevent crime is being seriously questioned by a continuously increasing number of law enforcements but the general opinion is that death penalty is not the appropriate way to punish criminals, because it does not deter people from committing a crime, it may result in the death of an innocent person, and it is not ethical.
…show more content…
It goes against human rights because the right to life is the most important right which human beings have. Of course, a criminal should be punished whatever the crime, but not by capital punishment because everybody has a right to live even if they are brutal criminals. It does not give us the reason to take someone’s life. Moreover, it is contradictory to the purpose of punishment. The aim of punishing criminals is to teach, make them understand they made a mistake and took lessons from this mistake and did not repeat this mistake the rest of their life. However, Capital Punishment takes this chance from criminals hand and does not give opportunity for them to understand their mistake because killing someone by murder after they have murdered does not teach them a lesson. Criminals can not be taught by the same mistake. Also, capital punishment does not work as a punishment it works as a vengeance method in these law enforcements. And in the 21st century taking someone’s life for justice is shameful for all humanity. The government’s job is not to terminate life but to save it. As Gandhi says, “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.” To sum up, capital punishment must not be a punishment option for criminals because taking criminals life is immoral, and it does not match with the purpose of punishment.
In conclusion, no one benefits from capital punishment, and it is not good for both governments and criminals. Also, it is obvious that it has more disadvantages than its advantages. Because of all these factors, it seems clear, that capital punishment does not deter people from committing crimes, some innocent people may be killed and it is ethically wrong, so considering all the evidences it would be logical to suggest that capital punishment must be
The death penalty sends a message to citizens; a message that says murder is not outrageous, unless the state is doing it as a sanction. This message helps to justify civilian killings of people believed to be deserving of death and may possibly even cause an uprise in vigilante style murders. This message also leaves an almost open air on what is wrong and provides no consistent moral ground for society to base their beliefs on. This does not mean that people will suddenly think murder is a favorable deed, but it may cause some to not realize how terrible it is. Joseph Summer wrote this in an article titled “Some Adverse Effects of the Death Penalty in History”: “…people learned 3 lessons from the government’s violent example: to use
The capital punishment is well supported in this article. It clearly shows how ethos, pathos and logos support the why the capital punishment should be kept and not taken away. The reader is heavily given enough information to go towards the side of keeping the capital punishment. While there is little information why the punishment shouldn’t be used its not supported as well.
In the case of Capital Punishment, those who murder should pay the ultimate price for something they have taken themselves… their life. An online source provides evidence stating that. “All penalties have some deterrent effect, and the more severe the punishment, the more it deters”(Jacoby). This evidence proves that the harder the punishment, the less the crime will be committed again.
ABOLITION & JUSTIFICATION OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT UNDER HUMAN RIGHTS LAW The person who are killed because of some frightful crime or because of doing something wrong. This type of punishment is called capital punishment. Known as:- death penalty -It is a legal process -sentenced to death -because of crime i.e death sentence Capital punishment was common in ancient times i.e. whosoever commited a crime that is big or small was sentenced to death and that also by torturing them.
Although the death penalty may bring some closure to families of the victims and even the victims themselves it still should be abolished because the negatives outweigh the positives. People could be murdered by the state even if they are innocent. They are taking away any chance these people have at a normal life even though it's a life that they deserve and did nothing to have it taken away. 6. Conclusion
The Death Penalty or the Capital Punishment should be considered illegal due to all of the things that are wrong with it. First of all the 8th amendment even says that there should be no cruel or unusual punishments for breaking the law, which the death penalty violates. Second the methods that they kill people sometimes don’t work and make the recipient die in pain and agony. Third of all 19 states already don’t allow it and some people are innocent that end up getting executed. So this shows why the death penalty should be abolished because the 8th amendment, the cruel methods used, and if we fixed this it would result in a safer and better society.
Death penalty or the capital punishment is the harshest punishment the authority can give to a crime, there have been many debates on many aspects of the element of the death penalty whether on philosophical aspect such as is it really a good thing to kill the people who killed other to show that killing is wrong and is it morally right, or on religious aspect such as god give us this life so the state shouldn’t take this life god gave us furthermore the act of taking a life go against almost every religion on earth and even on a legal aspect since the person on death row might be falsely accused and if the act of execution is done there will be no going back, and death sentence seem like an “eye for an eye” type of punishment(such as cutting off the hand of the thief for stealing) but it has been proven many times before this type of punishment doesn’t work .This report is made as part of SPD 202 as of why death penalty should be considered as social problem. Since the death penalty concern the matter of life and death of a person, the execution of an innocent person isn’t simply a tragedy it is a major false from both the state and the institute of justice. There have been many reports of false execution coming from all over the world. Take Jesse-Tafero case for example he was accused and executed via electric chair back in May 1990, he was accused of killing 2 Florida highway officers, but later on in 1992 the whole case was overturned when crime scene
According to Randa (1997), the first established death penalty laws date as far back as the Eighteenth Century B.C in the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon, this codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes. Death penalty is the punishment of execution or took part in someone legally convicted of a capital crime. Although death penalty is the cheapest way to remove criminal from society, death penalty should be banned because it puts innocent life at risk and mentally ill people are executed. First, death penalty should be banned because it put innocent lives at risk. Once a prisoner is killed, nothing can be change to make amends if mistake has been made.
Does the punishment fit the crime? Capital punishment is quite controversial. Many argue against it saying this form of punishment is unconstitutional. However, those convicted are given a reasonable punishment and opportunities to have their cases reassessed if need be.
The death penalty has been a part of the judicial system for many years. It is the legal process where the state court system orders execution of a person for a crime he or she committed. A death penalty crime is a horribly brutal and violent crime most people cannot even imagine. These crimes consist of acts like serial killing, mass murder, and other crimes of violent killing. However, Espionage and treason neither are brutal or violent and are considered a death penalty offense.
Death penalty is like the ‘’tooth for a tooth – eye for an eye’’ theory. Instead of acting inhuman to our fellow beings we should find a better way to solve the mind of criminals. Making the problem vanish is not a good idea. We should do psychological researching instead! I, myself have a lot of faith in humanity.
Does society really need Capital punishment or would we be better off without it? For many facts that I have found in my research I believe society could do better then Capital Punishment. The most debated reason over the death pentaly is if it is right or wrong morally. There are many angles to look at this question.
The definition of capital punishment is stated as the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime; also known as the death penalty. The capital punishment is used in extreme cases for people who commit capital crimes, more commonly used in murder cases. There are five ways the death penalty can be executed: Lethal injection, electrocution, gas chamber, hanging, and the firing squad. One of the common reasons that the death penalty is supported is people feel that if the criminal is executed for his crimes it will prevent people from doing the same crime. However, is that really a soundproof reason to keep the death penalty legal?
Eliminating capital punishment does not mean that supporting crime rate and put the society into danger. It intends to have feature of promoting human rights. When almost the world wants to remove death penalty from all of legal system, people must think of replacing punishment, which still protect the life. In various punishments, it seems that life imprisonment is the best choice. Life imprisonment (or life sentence) means having to spend the rest of a person’s life in jail.
Regardless, escape is constantly conceivable. And even inside prison, a condemned criminal may murder or assault a jail guard, a fellow inmate or even a guest. Execution is the only way to keep him from perpetrating additional acts of crime. Since it is the only right to ensure safety to the innocent people in the society from the most genuine crimes, capital punishment is sometimes right. Granted that society would be unjustified in taking a man’s life in discipline for any trivial wrongdoing, capital punishment is only reprisal for the greatest crimes.