Most of the students and staff think dress code should not be allowed. Now I wonder why do we actually have a dress code? School dress code does not improve student behavior and need to be eliminated. So I go to oak grove middle school and we have a dress code policy. It contains shirts , shoes and pants.
54). Therefore zero-tolerance policies have not had the outcome that politicians have hoped for and should be examined for the effects that they have had on our students. The purpose of this study will be to examine discipline suspensions and expulsions, attendance, and poverty to determine if there is a correlation between these and the graduation rates. In an article by Nirvi Shah (2011), there is discussion about the effects of zero-tolerance policies. Nirvi Shah continues by saying, “Over the past two years, an increasing number of reports and initiatives have pointed out
SATS and ACTS have been used for numerous years as a way to gauge a student’s academic success while in college. Students have the choice which test they would prefer to take and most colleges do not prefer one test over the other. There are a few key differences between the SAT and ACT, which may make one test more suitable than the other for those taking the tests. Many studies have proven that the SAT and ACT are not the best judge of future success, and that colleges should focus their applications more on past grades and accomplishments to decide which students should be accepted to their university. SATs and ACTs are not an effective measure of college readiness and future academic success.
Are Trigger Warnings Doing More Harm Than Good? The biggest question that we see spreading across a number of universities today is whether or not we should require trigger warnings in the college classroom. Within universities and colleges, trigger warnings are the idea that professors should caution their students about any potentially upsetting material that they are about to be exposed to. Developing into a movement lead mostly by students; college campuses are now being demanded to “be scrubbed clean of words, ideas, and subjects that might cause discomfort or give offense (Lukianoff,1).” It has become a widespread debate of whether trigger warnings actually do more harm or good to those students who receive them. Many people believe that trigger warnings are a positive thing since it helps professors approach material
Standardized tests in schools today in Ohio should be stopped because they are causing for teachers to be evaluated by the test results of how the students do on the tests, they are having the students more stressed about school and do they benefit you in colleges and university and do they really look at how well students do on them test. Standardized testing are giving in many areas of the nation According to a article by “The Washington Post” “The study analyzed tests given in 66 urban districts in the 2014-2015 school year. It did not count quizzes or tests created by classroom teachers, and it did not address the amount of time schools devote to test preparation”(Layton Lyndsey). Teachers are being evaluated by students and how well they do on the standardized test. Several states have tied student performance to teacher evaluation.
To the contrary, guns have been banned is school for many years. So this law affects the student community. This new law really got me meditating and deciding whether or no I wanted to support such law really baffled me. There are so many bright sides, yet so many dark sides to both positions. I took a look at the entire picture and found that it was really for the best to let the law pass.
The troubled teens aren’t learning the right amount of education they need. They are actually learning less than the average student. The author of “Report: Juvenile justice system schools “do more harm than good” says, “The education provided to the 70,000 juveniles incarcerated on any given day across the nation is “substandard” and “is setting them even further back in their ability to turn their lives around,” according to a report released today by the Southern Education Foundation.” Not one, Not two, but 70,000 juveniles are being set back in the education that’s being provided in the system. These juveniles can’t turn their lives around if they aren’t getting the proper
When asked if students are satisfied with the merchandise and products in Gator Town, the students who answered no, gave reasoning which tied back to Gator Town 's weaknesses. The chart above shows that 76 percent (38 students) of River Bluff students who were surveyed are satisfied with the merchandise and products in Gator Town. The other 26 percent (12 students) of students are not satisfied. Many students who said no, gave reasoning to why they were not satisfied. For example, one student stated, “No, I am not satisfied with the merchandise and products in Gator Town because there aren’t any shirts that I would buy".
It would transform it by bringing about a draft out of secondary school for universities to draft players and purchase them and afterward they would need to do it once more once they choose to leave school (Wieberg). Writer of "School Sports and the Myth of Amateurism", Allen Sack, composes all alone encounters as a grant football player at the University of Norte Dame. "Not accepting extra installments for my execution on the football field demonstrated to me that training was the genuine reason I was in school and that we are not experts, in light of the fact that the dominant part of us are not going ahead to play at the expert level" (Sack). This demonstrates to us that since he didn 't gather any kind of additional installment competitors can get by without getting more than they are now get. Sack, likewise goes ahead to say that since he was not getting paid it improved the opposition that much since he was playing since he truly needed to.
1st Amendment and the College Campus Have you ever wondered why some college campus protests are shutdown even though the first amendment is in place? The first amendment does not always protect in every situation. The first amendment wasn’t enforced much until the 1960’s and 70’s, when the anti-war and gender equality protests first started. College campuses have a right to impede on the first amendment if it is restricting someone else’s rights. In many cases some protesters will block off an entrance to an event or will start to harass people walking past.
Gary Gutting and Mark Edmundson the authors of the essays “What is College For?” and “On the Uses of a Liberal Education” respectively expressed their opinions on how college isn’t what it used to be. Gutting said some universities don’t teach what they are supposed to; they make some classes compulsory so students end up taking classes that are unnecessary. In result when students are given these particular courses as they become disinterested and aim for average instead of learning the material. Gutting also points out lack of academic engagement is why people misinterpret the existence of the college. He says both students and professors need to work together in order to keep the true meaning of college, according to him is to nourish a world of intellectual culture.
By not being a responsible and dedicated student, he opened himself up for failure. On his last year of high school, Jim received a letter stating that he had received an F for my class and therefore could not graduate. He lacked five required units. Jim managed to obtain a “D” in
He says, “If parents were uncomfortable with this decision, they could place their child in a different local school.” This is another made up scenario being used to back up his point. This is another flaw in his article. Michael Cantrell, of “Should Students Be Allowed to Pray in School” made some valid points, but also made many errors. It is important to back up claims with facts and it is pivotal to not use logical fallacies. It is also important not to waffle back and forth.
On the other hand, the reason that it has been debated for 20 years now is because academic institutions feel that it deters intellectual discussion in the class environment and it further coddle students. The problem with the trigger warning debate is that there are two prevailing positions that are polar opposites. Both arguments also have their own idea of what constitutes as justice and injustice. The intended audience for this persuasive essay is the faculty and administrative members in universities so they can be affirmed of the few benefits and many dangers of trigger warning policies. However, the audience will be provided with a lens of seeing trigger warnings in a different light.
In fact, the prospect of guns in the classroom is more likely to cause professors to keep the conversation tepid and avoid certain controversies; everyone else will watch what they say, how they say it and to whom. This would be quite the opposite of the open and transformative exchange that universities have made it their mission to offer. There is a further point. As we saw in the aftermath of the Ferguson and Staten Island police incidents, and earlier with the Occupy Wall Street movement, university campuses are places where political protest takes root. Perhaps colleges are not quite the haven for political protest that they once were -- like, say, in the 1960 's.