Against Slothful People Essay Imagine if your mom goes on strike and the house is all messy now. It is not good to be slothful because it can destroy your physical environment, it’s not fair to other people, and can ruin all aspects of your life. Not being productive can lead to you being behind on everything. If you forget to take care of laundry, the laundry will pile up. Not being productive can also lead to your environment being dilapidated. In "A One-Horse Town", the townspeople are slothful and their town “hasn’t ever been painted,”(pg 117) and it is run-down. It is also not fair to other people if you are slothful and expect someone else to do the work for you. If you were in a situation where you had a group project and someone didn’t …show more content…
Washington was a very hard- working person. Even though he was unable to get an easy education, he tried his hardest to try to learn on his own. Even though he faced many hardships,”he never succumbed to bitterness or hatred, but rather worked incessantly to build a better life for himself and his people.”(pg 119) He lived with a strict mistress and since he was so reliable, she trusted him. The same thing happens if you are like him. People trust you and want to be around you. He is a great role model for everyone. In my life, my father is definitely the most hardworking person I know. My dad gets up around 5 A. M. everyday and wakes me up. He also works a full-time job. Despite all of his work, he even helps my mom with work. With all of that, he still asks about my day and helps me with my homework. If my father isn’t hardworking, I don’t know who is. Unlike Booker T. Washington, a slothful person is irresponsible, lazy, unhelpful, arrogant, and unreliable. If we could hear the thoughts of a slothful person they might go like this: “Why should I work? They will just do it for me. I want to sleep all day. Why are they asking me to work? If they want a job done, they should do it themselves. I absolutely hate working. It is horrible to work. We should all just be lazy and kick the annoying ‘hard-working’ people out of town.” If you had heard these, how would you feel? You would be furious, right? Most people would …show more content…
After all, they betray a whole country or a close friend. However, traitors are actually better than slothful people. At least they are working, even if their purposes aren't righteous. A slothful person couldn’t even dream of doing what a traitor does. A traitor does things in secret, risks ruining their life, and courage to even qualify as a traitor. It doesn’t take any work to be a slothful person. Being a traitor is a hard job that requires the person to be brave enough to betray something. Being a slothful person doesn’t even require anything but being lazy. A traitor brings a country down or a person down, but a slothful person brings everything down such as people’s emotions, towns, cities, and workplaces. It is a bad decision to pity a slothful person, because pity will only encourage them and damage their life even more. The slothful person will find your pity as a reason to continue to be slothful. I ‘A One-Horse Town’, the town was run-down and in ruins: “The stores and houses was most all old shackly dried-up frame concerns that hadn’t ever been painted.”(pg. 117) Since the loafers were slothful, the town was a mess. The people of the town depended on them and they failed. What if a firefighter was slothful? The houses would burn down. Pitying a slothful person will only damage
He will care about his daughters and raise them to be responsible women who can work properly while respecting
From the beginning of the book, it is clear that he cares about his family very deeply, and is dedicated to working to make sure he gives his children fortune and happiness. But once ‘Papa’ as he is referred to in the book, is sent to
While he enjoyed the benefits of being the only child all of the families expectations were placed squarely on him. Among all of his family members, his father had the biggest influence on his life providing him with many of the core
A strong work ethic was required. “If a fellow won’t work, he has no right to anything.” However when a worker that
However, as DeYoung acknowledges, “Sloth, on this view, is apathy— comfortable indifference to duty and neglect of other human beings’ needs. If you won’t work hard, you don’t care enough. Sloth becomes a sin not merely because it makes us lazy, but because of the lack of love that lies behind that laziness” (DeYoung, p. 81). In other words, there is clearly more to sloth than laziness. This vice actually seems to connect more with lack of love or indifference.
Have you ever wondered if there’s a thing such as “working too much”? In Richard Schiffman’s article “Why we should work less” he writes about the effects working too much has on Americans. Working too much takes a toll on peoples mental health, they could lose their social life, or begin drinking for relaxation, along with many other affects. The author builds an argument to procure the audience that we need to work less. Schiffman creates this argument by using multiple techniques such as using personal experiences from his friends, data to support his claim, and appeals to the audience's sense of logic.
“a 2007 study pegged its prevalence in the American work force at 38 percent. This should not be surprising. Much of this fatigue may result from the steady, surreptitious accumulation of shadow work in modern life.” Lambert truly does argue that the technology and these machines increased the amount of shadow work we do. However, Craigs use of unsupported ethical appeals that causes his readers to doubt his claim that Groceries (self check out), gas stations, examples with oils changes and squeegeeing our cars and planning our own flight and even our own travel arrangements are truly apart of the extra shadow work.
He knew from a very young age that the only way to unlock freedom was through education. If a man can teach himself things then he will be able to prosper. If a man is only able to do tasks under the greater authority of help then a man will survive. Washington didn’t want to just survive, he wanted to prosper and be free. In 1865 after the emancipation proclamation was instated as law the slaves were free.
Moreover, the fact that the objects continue to work tirelessly, despite knowing that their efforts will ultimately benefit the ruling class, suggests a sense of duty and loyalty that is often exploited under capitalism. The objects, like many members of the working class, are made to believe that their work is necessary and meaningful, even when it serves the interests of the ruling class rather than their
The author Andrew Curry thinks that workers today are unfulfilled because they would rather work a job they do not like and earn more money than work a job that they are passionate about and earn less. He also talks about how people seem to work more than relax in today's age like when he says “instead of working less, our hours have stayed steady or risen.” (Curry, Kirszner and Mandell 399) the evidence that he uses to connect his view is the amount of people who complain about their jobs. Nowadays everyone knows a person that constantly complains about his or her job but they still work that same job because of the financial gain. Many people today hate the job they work but that same job is the reason they have a car, house etc.
Unlike virtue, which is desirable and moral, vice is immoral or wicked behavior. As one of the “Seven Deadly Sins”, the vice of sloth is defined as reluctance to work or make an effort. According to Franklin, sloth is caused by habit which takes “the advantage of inattention” (Franklin, 331). In other words, a lazy person unconsciously sticks to their life routine, which keeps them from doing anything more productive than their usual chores. On the other hand, Saint Augustine believes that sloth is caused by the “peculiar attractiveness” of not having to do anything (Saint Augustine, 299).
Today’s world would describe laziness as not doing anything productive, whereas he saw lazy as being content with who you are and what you have. Being satisfied with yourself is incredibly important. Don't necessitate things that don’t involve you in the first place. In paragraph 8, Morley introduced an argument about the Germans. He claims “If the Germans had been as lazy, as indifferent, and as righteously laissez-fairish as their neighbors the world would have been spared a great deal.”.
Though it takes only the jingling of bells to pull him from his shallow sloth, it is these promises that pull him from this despairing sloth, suggesting that he feels guiltier about the temptation to break these promises than avoiding work. While the other characters and authors below the narrator on the scale seem to renounce guilt in some way and those above the narrator seem to be quite wracked with guilt, this narrator is neutral, with only slight hints of guilt. Instead of being overwhelmed by sloth or scorning it, he seems to be simply observing
In his essay, “On Laziness”, Christopher Morley persuades his audience that laziness is a virtuous trait rather than a shameful one through the use of irony, diction, historical allusions, and logical reasoning. Morley utilizes irony to describe the consequences of having a good work ethic. He states, “We have been hustling about for a number of years now, and it doesn’t seem to get us anything but tribulation…. It is the bustling man who always get put on committees, who is asked to solve the problems of other people and neglect his own.” The irony in this statement is that as people try hard to prove that they are responsible beings, they bury themselves in piles of responsibility even though they do not want it.
Sluggard- The sluggard dreads places where work must be done, so he gives excuses not to work. He is in love with ease and doing nothing. He will refuse to even do the most essential things if it involves work and won't endure the least of pains. He is self-conceited and has caused himself to be lazy because of his high opinion.