Understanding Aggressive earnings management
This is a process in which a company firstly estimates their financial position, and then works backwards in order to achieve these desired figures
Aggressive earnings management refers to using accounting policies and stretching judgments of what is acceptable to present corporate performance in a more favorable light than the underlying reality.
Aggressive earnings management also refers to any accounting practice that is technically correct but deviates from how accounting policies were intended to be used. It capitalizes on the loopholes in general accounting principles in order to disguise financial performance.
There are many times when companies adopt aggressive accounting practices including selection of inappropriate accounting policies and / or unduly stretching judgements as to what is acceptable when forming accounting estimates.
These aggressive earnings management practices, while presenting the financial performance of companies, in favorable position, do not reflect the underlying reality.
Aggressive earnings management can occur in any entity, including the
…show more content…
Window Dressing for an Initial Public Offering (or a Loan) – For companies entering phases where it is critical that reported earnings look good, accounting assumptions can be stretched—sometimes to the breaking point. Such phases include just before making a large loan application or just before the initial public offering (IPO) of stock. Many studies have demonstrated the tendency of managers to boost their reported earnings using accounting assumptions in the period before an IPO.
5. Litigation
The political cost hypothesis predicts when a firm subject to investigation may have the incentive to manage earnings to reduce the probability and amount of imposed wealth transfer (Alam and Makar, 1998). Cahan (1992) argues that firms will attempt to reduce the value of the wealth transfer by reducing its likelihood or size of the
DATE: September 23, 2015 TO: Professor Stevens FROM: Briana Nguyen SUBJECT: Groupon, Inc., and Revenue Recognition Issues PURPOSE This report will explore the accounting treatment employed by Groupon, Inc. (“Groupon”) in its revenue recognition for fiscal years 2008 through 2010 as well as the first six months of 2011. Specifically, we will review the following in regard to its initial public offering (IPO) in accordance with FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification (ASC): • Revenue recognition as a primary obligor • Revenue recognition as a principal or an agent • Revision of revenue recognition on gross basis to net basis and effect on revenue and net income BACKGROUND In November of 2008, Andrew Mason, Eric Leftkofsky, and Bradley Keywell
Wealthy people today bribe politicians in order to reduce their taxes and this is referenced in a quote by Warren Buffett, “These and other blessings are showered upon us by legislators in Washington who feel compelled to protect us.” Buffett claims that an investor that earn billions per day can get a bargain of fifteen percent of tax interest, which is much less than the thirty three to forty one percent interest for the middle class. Similarly, some of the Gilded Age’s policies benefit the wealthy. For instance, because of the exploitation,workers united and striked against the cruelty. However, employers appealed for court orders against unions because the federal government denied unions recognition as legally protected organization.
Is the author 's argument based on any unproven assumptions? If so, identify the assumptions and identify what information is needed. The author 's arguments are based on unproven assumptions. For instance, he assumes that, it is false that material wealth is the standard of success and this goes hand in hand with the abandonment of the false belief that public office and high political position are to be valued only by the standards of pride of place and personal profit.
Speaker The speaker is Annie Dillard, who is also the author of the book. In Holy the Firm, the author expresses her thoughts in regard to questions such as the reason that humans are created by God; the meaning and essence of God’s work; and the relationship between the believers and God. Dillard encounters great conflicts in her belief in God when she saw that a girl in her neighbour’s farm was burned by a plane crash. She starts to question whether every act of God has any real meaning in it and if it does, why would God let a innocent girl be burned by excruciating fire at such a young age when she has done nothing wrong. She even wonders if God is just a powerless creator who has no power to save those who suffer from atrocities.
Matthew Leav PPE 400 Lowe February 6th, 2023 Explaining Edward Conard’s Argument for Lower Taxes on the Rich In his book The Upside of Inequality: How Good Intentions Undermine the Middle Class, Edward Conard argues that lowering taxes on the rich would lead to higher growth and further innovation which would justify any resulting economic inequality (Lowe 2023). He argues that the notion that America’s richest members are to blame for growing inequality is mistaken (Conard 12). Rather, inequality is a result of growth and innovation and is an unavoidable consequence in a developing economy (Conard 13). In this paper I will seek to explain this argument.
British sociologist Herbert Spencer adds some social Darwinism by arguing that “free market economies constitute the most civilized form of human competition in which the ‘fittest’ will naturally rise to the top”. This school of thinking believes that inequality is needed to create incentives to drive the performance of companies and individuals. An important element of this trickle down effect involves income tax cuts for the rich. It is argued that cutting income tax for the rich will benefit everyone, not just high income-earners. The trickle down effect explains that if that if higher-income earners get an increase in disposable income, they will thus increase their spending, creating additional demand in the economy.
The meaning of the free enterprise on trial means to achieve success by hardwork and taking risks. In his book, “From beyond Outrage”, Robert Reich speaks about how wealth is concentrated among the top wealthiest people in American leading to a wide gap between the rich and poor by increasing inequalities in income. This has not only disgusted Reich, but he is outraged too with the statistics that suggest how the top rich Americans are only getting richer, while those at the bottom of the line are suffering. The inequality gap has grown consistently over the years in America making more than half of the public change their opinion about the wealthy families in U.S. People now believe that those with money need to be taxed heavily and there should be an equal re-distribution of wealth.
Peter Singer article propels capable explanations behind willful redistribution: Many individuals in America are poor, and the change in their lives that wealthier individuals can realize by giving cash is huge by examination with the little give up this would include. An avocation for lessening disparity through non-willful means, for example, tax assessment, needs to clarify why redistribution of this kind is not simply robbery. Inequality is important to urge business people to go for broke and set up new business. Without the possibility of considerable prizes, there would be minimal motivation to go out on a limb and put resources into new business opportunities. Trickle Down Effect.
Alessandra Stanley, author of “Silicon Valley largesse overlooks income inequality; The entrepreneur/philanthropists of the San Francisco-area tech industry are as conservative as benefactors of the past,” would agree with Hazlitt’s point that forced redistribution of taxes is not the answer. Stanley feels that income inequality and poverty is an engineering issue and not a tithe. Stanley solution is focus money elsewhere, like education, instead of forcing redistribution. Stanley argues that taking from the rich would do more harm than good because they make these big foundations and donate to people in need of
The wealthier one gets, it seems, the more one rationalizes their decisions and actions. The more one stains their morality little by little until they no longer need to choose what’s right and wrong but what benefits them. Whether it’s right or wrong is then irrelevant. From people to companies, wealth is the source of
They also attempted to shape thinking, to make acceptable difference in income that would otherwise be odious”(395). In economic and political fields, people who are in charge take advantage of the authority, in other words, the dominance to consolidate and bolster their superiority. They influence (or manipulate, to some extent) the public’s thoughts and convey the idea that the difference in income is reasonable and justifiable to the public. Both Ho and Stiglitz mention people’s desire to maintain and strengthen the status.
Edmonds, T. P., Tsay, B., & Olds, P. R. (2011). Fundamental managerial accounting concepts (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
Traditionally, pro forma earnings are lampooned as “earnings before the bad stuff”, which are lower than the figure according the GAAP. Companies may present to the public their earnings and results of operations on the basis of methodologies other than GAAP. And this presentation in the earnings release is often referred to as “pro forma” financial information. Many companies were thought to be using pro forma figures not only to exclude one-time charges, but also to strip put recurrent costs and other elements that they claimed concealed their “true” performance. “Pro forma” financial information can serve useful purposes.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Executive compensation is a broad term which comprises of financial compensation and non-financial rewards given to an executive from their firm for their services. This package is decided by a company’s Board of Directors (consisting of independent directors). It should be designed in a manner which incentivizes the executives and motivates them to perform in accordance with the company’s goals and its long term growth. These packages generally include a mix of short-term incentives (including salary, annual bonus, benefits, and perquisites) and long-term incentives (including stock options and restricted shares). E.g. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella received a compensation package of $84.3 million for the software maker’s
In order to identify red flags for risk management from various financial risk ratios, models, and traditional ratios for Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers, we list our calculation results below. Based on our calculation, Bear Stearns got 15 red flags, which occupied 68% of total red flags, while Lehman Brothers 12 red flags, occupying 55% of total red flags. These two numbers were high even compared with other investment banks, and companies committed fraudulent activities. In summary, both Lehman Brothers and Bear had high possibility of going bankruptcy.