"Agricultural Act of 2014: Highlights and Implications." USDA ERS. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 May 2015.
This web page from the US Department of Agriculture’s website gives an overview of every aspect of the Agricultural Act. On the overview, it gives a graph showing where the outlays are going. In each tab, it specifies what the bill does for each industry. In the first tab, regarding crop commodities, it says among many things that two new programs will be created to compensate farmers in the cost it takes to create crops. It creates two new programs for dairy and livestock as well. Several other things are specified for each of the many categories the bill covers, such as new programs being introduced and replaced in rural development. This page
…show more content…
"Congressional Budget Office." Letter to Honorable Frank D. Lucas. 28 Jan. 2014. Congressional Budget Office. N.p., 28 Jan. 2014. Web. 17 May 2015.
Grassley, Chuck E., Sen. "The Agricultural Act of 2014." YouTube. YouTube, 31 Jan. 2014. Web. 17 May 2015.
"H.R. 2642 (113th): Agriculture Reform, Food, and Jobs Act of 2013." GovTrack. Civic Impulse, LLC, n.d. Web. 17 May 2015.
This GovTrack page for the Agricultural Act of 2014 (the name was changed after it failed to pass before the expiration date, which is why it says 2013 instead of 2014) provides many useful bits of information about the bill. It identifies the sponsor of the bill, Frank Lucas, and includes the official Congressional Research Service summary of the bill. It says the day it was introduced and whether or not the bill was enacted (it was). This page provided very useful pieces of information regarding the bill, all of which I will need to make a decent paper. For example, I was not aware of how the name was changed from the Agriculture Reform, Food, and Jobs Act of 2013 to the Agricultural Act of 2014 until I came across this page. The CRS summary is very useful as well, because it provides a shorter and more compiled version of the actual
Is it because the amount of Congressional farmers supersedes the amount of independent farmers? Or could it be that they do not want to deal with the public fallout if there is a huge disproportion of farmers? If taxpaying dollars are being used to support this industry, then citizens deserve the right to
With that kind of control, limiting the production of farmed goods makes it difficult for one to get enough food for one's family. With this act being established it was followed by the Subsistence Homestead program which granted families housing on land where they are able to produce a good portion of their own food. This was to help initiate independence and to help
This plan gave farmers the option to “deposit crops for government certificates worth [80%] of their market value. ”6 This plan was instated to eliminate forced seasonal crop sales at deflated prices.7 This was so farmers could actually make a profit and aren’t left in the poverty
It was also called the farm control bill of 1938. The field representative for the AAA for Texas and Oklahoma, Rob B. Mefferd said that the farmers were
There were a number of reasons why Goldwater scrutinized this act. For example, Goldwater said that this intervention in agriculture neglected the Constitution’s limitations on government, since “No power over agriculture was given to any branch of the national government” (29). He explained how the first Agricultural Adjustment Act was denied by the Supreme Court, but the second was passed under the justification of “regulation of interstate commerce” (30). This justification in and of itself seemed objectionable to Goldwater, who called this misinterpretation of the Constitution “the most flagrant on record” (30). Through this legislation, Goldwater claimed that the jurisdiction of agriculture had been handed over to the federal government instead of the states, and also made the commerce clause exceptionally broad.
Subsequently, the combination of the high supply and low demand caused farmer profits to reach an all-time low, thus leading to the government having to intervene in order to put an end to the economic meltdown the farmers were facing. This action ended up establishing subsidies surrounding agriculture, encouraging the growth of a select few crops and advocating for “mix[ing] corn-based ethanol into our gasoline”, not only protecting farmers from falling deeper into a cycle of debt but also revitalizing the entire agriculture industry. Now, corn production is one of the only ways that farmers can stay afloat in the economy despite their ever-increasing debt as they move forward with more improved technology. As affirmed by journalist Nathan F., “ethanol [among other corn-based products] has brought a lot of money into the farming economy”, and it would be reasonable to assume that a forced decline in corn’s prominence would be devastating to
This Homestead Act they are more in the public land they able to see they would able help those small farmers. In them own opposition
This picture is formatted as if it was to be a flyer with statistics related to agricultural throughout the states. The audience this image attracts would include women, and others interested in agriculture, and possibly even some men who are very set strong in the traditional ways. With the use of statistics this image from the USDA provides the audience with an obvious use of a logistics
The three essays assigned this week had several common threads running through them. The strongest core theme is the rapid change in the food cycle in America and the vast changes that have taken place in the way by which we grow, produce, and process the food that average Americans eat. The food we eat now is drastically different from what our grandparents grew up eating and the three essays each examine that in a different way. Another theme is the loss of knowledge by the average consumer about where their food comes from, what it is composed of, and what, if any, danger it might pose to them. “Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear” by Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele is a harsh look at the realities of food production in a country where large corporations, like Monsanto, have been allowed to exploit laws and loopholes to bend farmers and consumers to their
Then since they all had so much crops it wouldn’t sell. Fast forward a few years later to when there was a big drought that made it really hard to grow anything, and they land became literal lots filled with dust. For many it was simpler to sell everything they own, and buy an automobile and go Westward. For those that chose to stuck through they had Agricultural Adjustment Act(AAA). The AAA had the ability to help farmers by having an agent come into each county to advise they how much they can grow as well as what particular crops to grow.
Nearly all Agricultural products have been improved or influenced by land grants. Engineering programs was funded by industries that were supported by universities research and work. Home Economics promoted nutrition information and new home appliances. Extension staff was also was able to assist with community
The 1900’s were a revolutionary century for American Agriculture thanks to the improvement of industrial technology and other advances in the field. The industrial technology ranged from many things, but machines had now given way for a decrease in manpower on the farms. (Farias, 2012) In 1906, in response to Upton Sinclair’s novel, The Jungle, The Pure Food and Drug Law was created, which required the USDA to inspect the sanitation of agricultural businesses.
A Agriculture Agriculture in Rhode Island is important; it is one of the state’s top industries. Farming earns Rhode Island’s government $59.6 million dollars per year. Most money being made from the agriculture is from sod, ornamental trees, and shrubs. The surface of the state is 10% farmland, although less than 3% of the population farm, and the future of farming here is uncertain. Due to population density, prices of land are rapidly increasing.
An agency in violation of this bill shall be fined as follows: 1st offense:500,000 fine 2nd offense:The USDA will suspend product manufacturing from that company for 1 year 3rd offense: The company will be shut
As Patel himself states, we need to get inside the hourglass and make the food system work for all of us, as farmers, producers, distributers, and consumers as a whole. Regardless of the confusion a first time reader may run across, this book does one thing undoubtedly right: it makes you think long and hard about everything you thought you knew about food. It goes far past GMOs and RoundUp, way beyond HFCS and the overproduction of soybeans, over and above those who are stuffed and those who are starved. Throughout the span of the novel, Patel not only helps you realize that there are many issues in our food economy, but also makes you feel how vital it is to take back what we did not even realize had long been