During the end of the 18th century, change was prevalent throughout the world, the French revolution occurred, the U.S. began to take shape as its own nation, and Napoleon Bonaparte came into power after the revolution. One of Napoleon’s first conquests was that of Egypt, he fought them for a while, but to no avail. Egypt, as he learned, was far too difficult to conquer by force. It was clear that Napoleon needed to use another tactic, but what the plan would be was a more difficult problem. A contemporary Egyptian author, Al-Jabarti, chronicles what happens as Napoleon attempted to conquer Egypt. There are a couple of questions that Al-Jabarti may help answer, the first is what was Napoleon’s tactic and if he had success, and secondly, does the usage of a single primary source give the full picture, or is it often too clouted by the author’s opinions to be used by itself? According to Al-Jabarti, the first tactic Napoleon used to be the aforementioned win by sheer force, which was not as successful as Napoleon would have hoped (Al-Jabarti 36). With this in mind, …show more content…
These issues start with understanding that no person is ever completely objective, this is further exacerbated by the fact that Al-Jabarti’s life will most likely change under the rule of Napoleon. This becomes reading almost like a newspaper of the time, it gives an honest look at what a piece of the population is thinking and believing, but it does not give the full story. Even if a modern writer were to write a secondary source based upon Al-Jabarti’s chronicles and a second contemporary chronicler of the same event, we will still miss out on the whole story, since the act of picking the two different pieces is subjective in its own right, leading to one’s preferred outcome in their
The Russians had two main things working for them during Napoleon’s attack. First of all, they had a large land mass/size, it would take an extensive amount of time for Napoleon to transport troops, food, clothing, etc. Secondly, Russia had weather as an advantage, more specifically their Russian winters. The reason behind this being so crucial was because Napoleon was completely unaware and unprepared for the major threat it posed to his men. Napoleon lost numerous amounts of men due to the Russian winter that he was
His troops also moved south far up the Nile and conquered Nubia, which had once thrown off Egyptian rule.” Strong and powerful leaders caused Egypt to expand across large quantities of land, all the way to the Euphrates River. During the Old Kingdom, Egypt stretched from the Nile Delta, along the Nile River to a little past Thebes, the capitol of Egypt before Amenhotep’s reign. During the Middle Kingdom, Egypt stretched a little further south, past the tropic of cancer, but it was only during the New Kingdom when dramatic changes occurred. Because of all the conquests, Egypt stretched all the way to Syria, by the Euphrates
The book I reviewed was The Wars In Syria and Palestine of Thutmose III. The book was written by Donald B. Redford, an Egyptologist and archaeologist who teaches at Pennsylvania State University. This book provides info on Thutmose III, who was the 6th pharaoh of the 18th Dynasty. Thutmose III is credited with expanding Egypt’s borders to its largest size during its imperial period. The area that Thutmose III conquered during his reign stretched from North Syria to Nubia, and he was known as the ruler of the “Black land and Red land.”
In 332 B.C, Alexander the great conquered Egypt, this was part of his plan to take over the Persians. The Egyptians thought that he would give them back there independence, but unfortunately he didn’t. After the death of Alexander a man named Ptolemy ruled. He made sure that many knew that the Greeks had conquered Egypt. In 50 B.C the Ptolenies Greek kings of Egypt were weakening in power, and with the help
Napoleon dominated the European battlefields during his pre-1809 reign as France’s emperor. The French military genius overwhelmed inferior military opponents with innovative maneuvers of mass armies, total war supported with French nationalism, and rapid decisive military victories. Following 1809, Napoleon’s military successes faded as he stubbornly applied French Revolution-era military strategies against present enemy forces of equal strength and tactical adeptness.
The Islamic Empire expanded quickly by conquering a vast amount of territory and for the development and appreciation of knowledge and science. The Muslims were fair and tolerant to the people they conquered. The commander of the Muslim forces, Abd Al-Aziz, told Theodmir, the king of southern Spain, that, “His followers will not be killed or taken prisoner, nor will they be separated from their women and children. They will not be coerced in matters of religion, their churches will not be burned, nor will sacred objects be taken from his realm, as long as he remains sincere and fulfills these conditions that we have set for him” (Document B, Treaty of Tudmir, 713 CE). By making this treaty, the Spanish people were allowed to be free and practice
Hatshepsut is renowned for being one of the most influential yet unknown Egyptian rulers of all time. Hatshepsut descended from Thutmose (I), a respected former Pharaoh and ruled Egypt for 15 years, focusing her reign on architecture and expeditions, rather than expanding Egypt (Johnson, 1978). Hatshepsut married her half-brother Thutmose (II) and after his death, overtook his reign, claiming the position of Pharaoh despite her step-son Thutmose (III) being the heir. Hatshepsut then assumed the role of co-regent, alongside her step-son and later, she procured the Double Crown (Gardiner, 1961). Hatshepsut was a remarkable ruler despite aspects of her reign making her a “sensationalist schemer”.
The ancient Roman and Egyptian cultures were very different. In Ancient Egypt the goal of life was to keep everything in order and methodical. The pharaoh’s job was to keep this order in Egypt. In contrast, Akhenaten was different, he was determined to change Egypt, just as Augustus was determined to change Rome. However, Ancient Romans wanted to be involved and bring new ideas.
Her pride was in the internal development of Egypt and commercial enterprise” (J.A Wilson, page 174, The Culture of Ancient History). This is shown to be a negative statement regarding Hatshepsut’s legacy and it clearly points out that her reign in the 18th Dynasty was not concentrated on the military campaign but in ruling the country. Historian, Sir Alan Gardiner, who states 10 years after Wilson’s statement “had been barren of any military enterprise except an unimportant raid into Nubia”. (A. Gardiner, page 189, Egypt of the Pharaohs). This response to Hatshepsut’s legacy reflects on the campaigns she conducted in Nubia (known as Sudan today) and also shows a negative perspective from a historian studying this.
Throughout history, the conquering of lands has held a large contribution in the development of various civilizations. The remnants of these conquests have celebrated the feats of rulers and their achievements. When military campaigns occurred frequently in the ancient Middle East, the victories of rulers have been recorded through inscriptions, artwork, and stone monuments. Rulers often recorded their conquests as a way to glorify their victory which helped for multiple purposes such as establishing power for both the ruler and his people.
“A Distant Mirror” was written by Barbara W. Tuchman. This book is nonfiction and could be used as a textbook. Tuchman was a scholar, writer, historian, journalist, and 2 time recipient of the Pulitzer Prize. She wrote first-hand as a French Nobleman. She also has written many works of history such as: “Bible and Sword”, “The Proud Tower”, “The Zimmerman Telegraph”, and many more.
Born in Corsica, in 1769, Napoleon Bonaparte was trained in France to be an engineer and military man. He rose from second lieutenant in the army to general in command for France and Egypt. In 1804 he had crowned himself Emperor of France, and continued war with Britain. His intention was to conquered all of Europe. The wars were named the Napoleonic Wars, and involved Britain, France, Austria, Prussia, and Russia, with France fighting against Britain and everybody else fighting against France.
In the poem Ozymandias and the novel, The Scarlet Pimpernel, the authors tell stories of two men whose thirst for victory and rule turn them into unforgiving leaders. As with every ancient egyptian king, Ozymandias wanted a vast empire that would conquer the world and intimidate anyone who dares to challenge their authority. The once mighty statue, now a pile of
This specific battlefield has affected Egypt through the ages and still at this moment there are allot of mines imbedded on the ground where al the maps were lost and cannot be found and until this time there is a big zone of ground on the north Mediterranean coast of Egypt that isn’t utilized because it is a quarantine mine
The ships were so large that Arabic poet, Nicholas the Turk wrote “when they looked at the horizon, could no longer see water, but only sky and ships: they were seized by unimaginable terror”. Napoleon sailed on the ship called l’Orient. Bonaparte conquered Malta and landed near Alexandria with no interference. At this time Egypt was under