Instead of stating his criticisms outright, Leonard would go on to add irrelevant details that serve no further purpose than to get readers to space out. It is best to write short and simple so readers can fully understand what someone is saying but Leonard adds numerous fluff lines to make his writing longer and more advanced. All in all, Leonard attempts to educate readers on the Joyce’s style of writing while also telling readers about the hidden messages behind those writing, including Irish nationalism. Joyce use of epiphany in his writing is what makes in so successful in the writing industry. However, the way Leonard presents his argument is confusing.
It provides the reader the ability to question their view on revenge as well as compare it to Poe’s ideas. I, for one, have no major revenge experiences such as the one in the story or any extreme cases in general, but I have had some of my own experiences of “revenge” and my own ideas of it. So while reading Poe’s story, I couldn’t help, but, to disagree with the ideas he presents over revenge. I believe the motive for revenge matters, the extent someone is willing to go for revenge isn’t always extreme, and regret isn’t always the result. In “The Cask of Amontillado” Poe gives no information as to why the protagonist, Montresor, is willing to kill a character, Fortunato, for revenge.
Reading resistance literature need an open mind. The reader does his or her best to understand things according to the view of the author and it is not easy for some people to agree with this point of view. Sometimes, the reader can not have a particular feeling , but the author use some descriptive words for showing emotions which he wants to present. If we study this issue carefully, we find that this issue is popular and prevalent everywhere throughout literature without taking some important points into account. Authors have a good chance and freedom to express themselves in different ways because of the open definition of resistance as if the definition of resistance literature is Specified this would limit the author’s ability to
The narrative of the French, Jewish, and Berber relations, while an exceptionally well-rounded story does not acknowledge, in the text itself, Geertz’s role in the situation - thus giving an incomplete account of the events. To not be reminded of the author's role, allows the reader to view the narrative as fact when in actuality the author’s observation and interpretation separate the reader from the truth. Observation is often taken for granted as an ethnographer's view and understanding is changed depending on the perspective he uses. While his approach to ethnography provides the reader with a coherent narrative, it neglects to show how the information was gathered or an evaluation of the reliability of the sources. Had he placed himself
The most intriguing aspects could not be observed which ruined the reader's experience of the story. This, depending on how you see it, is not Robert Louis Stevenson's fault but those who raised the expectations of the novel. Only rare glimpses of Mr Hyde was provided and the detestable, evil and nightmarish character that is promised never truly manifests in the reader’s eyes. Had it been written differently, the duality of human nature could have been more thoroughly
One significant point is that Zamyatin has stepped away from a science fiction genre to conquer his goal. This is because the conventions of a science fiction novel does not allow him to do so. His goal is to warn of the dangers of unchecked state control, to warn his state about the dangers of pursuing equality over individual freedom and creativity. To isolate every citizen’s human nature for equality is bound to have
We wrote the text and inserted it as part of the chapter in order to adhere it to the rest of society’s criticism seen in the book in the very best Vonnegut style. In order to interpret Vonnegut’s intentions and purpose of social criticism throughout Slaughterhouse Five, specially in chapter nine, it´s necessary to understand science fiction and its elements. For
From this investigation, I learnt firstly to choose a topic I am capable of exploring that I will not lose interest in or give up on. I realised early on that I was not really interested in the golden age of illustration but the golden age of comics that came after that. I should have paid more attention and done better research prior to confirming this topic as my final choice because it made me lose interest and put in less effort into my work. I learnt secondly to spread out the workload across more than just a handful of days. I struggled as I did not have the motivation to work and left a few days for each part of the task.
In every discipline and in certain genres (such as the empirical research report), some phrases are so specialized or conventional that you can’t paraphrase them except by wordy and awkward circumlocutions that would be less familiar (and thus less readable) to the audience. When you repeat such phrases, you’re not stealing the unique phrasing of an individual writer but using a common vocabulary shared by a community of
(1945) that the older fiction books are better than the new ones. This because the older fiction books had more virtue of imagination and style, which Wilson believes many detective stories lack today. Fiction writers today have more difficulty in controlling their stories and instead they had a life of their own and “flew away” states Wilson. Raymond Chandler writes in his article “The simple art of murder” (1944) how difficult it is to write fiction. According to Chandler, writers today have a poor knowledge of the society in which we live.