After reading the Alchemy, I was surprised by the hard work of those alchemists and the works they had been done. Some people consider their efforts as pseudoscience; however, I didn’t agree with it. I think that what they did in the past accomplish the science today.
When we talk about the science, what is the first thing comes out from your head? I don’t know yours, but mine is those famous scientists, like Einstein, Newtown Curie, Galileo, Darwin etc. It seems that every physics rule and hypothesis is made by them. So could we just say that they made the science?
Famous scientists left their splendid life stories, like the story of Newtown’s apple and the story of Einstein’s equation, and people will remember forever their contributions
…show more content…
He is very lucky that what he insists finally gave him payback. There are tons of hypothesizes in the field of physics and math; some of them cannot be proved and some of them are wrong, but no one knows exactly. The thing is, when scientists are doing a research, it probably takes decades or even longer to prove whether it is true or false. Just like in the book Alchemy by the author Lewis Thomas, those alchemists spent their whole lives to find the philosophers’ stone and the elixir of life, which, obviously, failed. But, “What they did accomplish, however, was no small thing: They got the work going. They fiddled around their laboratory, talked at one another incessantly, set up one crazy experiment after another, wrote endless reams of notes which were then translate from Arabic to Greek to Latin and back again, and their work got underway”(P8). Although what they wanted to do could never be success, but they did contribute to science, in the way they probably didn’t even know …show more content…
Furthermore, we should not only focus on the scientists themselves; we should be scientists ourselves and give our own ideas about the technology. Everyone in the society need to be scientific educated which, in longer point of view, can generate new ideas to get a better life. A cite which is known by almost every Chinese is “If there are a thousand readers, there must be a thousand Hamlets” which means people understand differently even on the same character in the same book. In another word, everyone will definitely have his/her different way to understand the science problems as well. There will be more other ideas which different with the existing ones, generate. These ideas may or may not correct all the time, since not all of us can be a famous scientists. However, people can create interesting and useful staff like how to travel in universe or how to solve mathematic conjuncture or how to concur energy problem. These unsolved problems will be solved if there are better scientist resource. So, the government need to fund the scientific education, because I believe scientifically educated people will feed back to society much more than they cost, as a result the society will be
M1, Introduction There is always a question which can’t be answered by scientist all of which relate to the perceptions of science as there is difference in how science is currently addressed. Also, people have different believes, opinions and interpretation of science in general. Questions science is currently addressing- cure for cancer?
Berry uses an example to support his claim. He speaks about a man named Claude Bernard, a “French physiologist,” as well as inserting a quote,”Science teaches us to doubt.” Putting this quote within the paragraph explains to
During the sixteenth and seventeenth century, many scientists had developed a new perspective on the world around them. Scientists such as Galileo and Copernicus envisioned a world where natural phenomenons could be proved through experimentation. Furthermore, the work of scientists during this time period were affected by the approval of political figures, the support from influential members of the church, and social factors that influenced the development and acceptance of new theories. To powerful political figures, scientific theories were regarded as an opportunity to gain power and money.
Scientists take the unknown and make it known. The audience will better understand the scientific method if it seems logical. Including examples of Einstein, accepting scientific theories, and designing experiments show that the basis of Barry’s argument is factual. “Einstein refused to accept his own theory until his predictions were tested,” showing even the best of the best scientists study with uncertainty. Barry’s appeal to logos helps characterize the intellectual side of science.
He tried and tried to stop the transformations at times he proved successful; but it did not last for long. This was an advancement in science.
He argued that science is essential to our understanding of the world and plays a crucial role in shaping our society. He stressed that science should be a public trust and that it is the responsibility of scientists to use their knowledge for the benefit of humanity. He supported his argument with a variety of examples, including the role of science in creating new technologies and in solving important social problems. He also spoke about the importance of international cooperation and the role of scientists in working together to create a better
Steven Shapin proves his thesis throughout the book through the use of primary and secondary sources in his three different sections of the book. The first section is titled “What was it Known?”. In this section, he utilizes important figures such as Galileo and his findings about the heavens and the earth along with Aristotle, Newton, Descartes, Boyle, and others to explain the scientific ideas presented in this time period.
First and foremost,in my perspective,I would say that the main message of the story The Alchemist is that whatever life gives you appreciate it. Life can always lead you to places or objects,but not every human can have them. To face facts life can be hard for some people and not as hard to others,in comparison to the Santiago’s life in the story he knew that he had to give up the only thing he had in order to get enough money to travel to egypt where he thought his treasure would be,and where he would get to know what his personal legend was,so he decided that he would go for his dream if he really wanted to be able to find his treasure. While traveling to the pyramids he came upon thieves,love,and fear,but none of that stop him from getting
Mankind has always tried to understand and interpret the world. Seeking explanations of natural phenomena and the creation of human being, trying to benefit and improve their life style. We can see this in novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley or in movies like “ I, Robot” by Isaac Asimov. Scientifics discover or invent things trough technology for beneficial use, but what happen if things that scientists invented aren't beneficial?
In life a single event can dramatically change a person forever but how they survive is what matters the most. In Night by Elie Wiesel and The Alchemist by Paulo Coelho, two character named Elie and Santiago are placed in life altering situations where they have to figure out how to persevere. Night is a dramatic book that recounts the reprehensible treatment that Elie had to live though during the Holocaust. Elie has to endure deplorable conditions in a Nazi concentration camp and learn to survive. He has to choose to separate himself from his experiences and still have hope. In contrast, The Alchemist is a hopeful book where Santiago goes on a journey and discovers new ideas and hidden treasures.
As Douglas Everett once said,"There are some people who live in a dream world, and there are some who face reality; and then there are those who turn one into the other. " What this essentially means is that there are people who live in dreams, the other’s live in mind and there are some who believe that true meaning of living exists in following their dreams so they try to make their dreams reality. I agree with this quote because some people just dream about things and leave it; while, others don’t believe in dreams at all. Then there are some people who actually try to convert their dreams into reality because they think that dreams are for a reason. This quote is best designed for Paulo Coelho book titled “The Alchemist” as Santiago constantly works to convert his dream into reality
This included things related to science, like physics, astronomy, and medicine. Through his method of doubt, which doubted things like senses, the solid foundation, and particular implications, he was able to establish that life and consciousness do actually exist
When he had arrived at the school he had the Scientific Revolution of the 17th century was already in full force. In the three years he was at the University he had been taught the standard curriculum but he was interested in it, so he wanted to go into more advance science. On his free time, he went to read the modern philosophers. He didn’t do good in his course but he started to take notes , in those notes he uses to called them "Quaestiones", because of that he had discovered the a new concept of nature and provided the framework for the Scientific Revolution. Although he didn’t graduate with honors but he won an award for the title of the scholar and four years of financial support of future education.
We live in an age where scientific breakthroughs are made daily. Unfortunately, society takes our success for granted. People do not comprehend precisely how far we have come and, more importantly, how we have done so. The desire to learn and explain observations sparked the scientific revolution a few thousand years ago. Like all newly garnered information, base knowledge first needs establishment to expand understanding.
Many influential individuals from the time of the Scientific Revolution presented us with the countless concepts we use today. However, they were only able to come to these conclusions through observation, experimentation, and reasoning. One example of a significant scholar from this time period is Nicolaus Copernicus. Nicolaus Copernicus published a book, On the Revolution of the