Being tough-headed and arrogant allows him to never be stepped on, and only follow through with the things you please. He was named king a little after the age twenty. Alexander the Great was easily known as one of the most successful kings of his time. Alexander the Great conquered what is most of the world today. To give a brief description of his victories, he conquered areas such as Egypt and Persia.
Compare and contrast the leadership and impact of Genghis Khan and Alexander the Great. Both Khan and Alexander are great leaders. They both conquered large territories and were able to guide both the leaders and the armies underneath their command. Alexander consolidated the Greeks into one empire (although being a Macedonian he was not really seen as Greek), This stopped all intestine wars among the Hellenic cities and somehow put order in the empire, transform Greece into a tremendous war machine that allowed him to conquer their eternal enemies the Persians and most of countries under their domain, reach as far as India before his death. As he was absorbed by Persian customs, and vices, most historians say he forgot his homeland, so the
• Alexander the Great was the best orator and a great commanding officer. He won multiple wars whether they were in Asia or at the sea while suppressing revolts from his conquered lands. On the other hand, Constantine the Great was the first Emperor to establish Christianity during his reign in Rome that shifted Western history. Both leaders were termed “Great” because of their own achievement. They had different set of ways in winning wars, improving Ancient Greek and Ancient Rome, and proving peace and prosperity.
When a very important British general died he was released from service for a short while(Fetzer 95). The British really wanted him to fight for them in the war because he was such a great leader(Fetzer 94). He normally commanded about 15,000 troops at one time, but he was frequently attacked by about 300 French and Natives when he tried to take fort Duquesne(Fetzer 99, Fetzer 94). He eventually learned how he was the most famous American born soldier. His army won the Revolutionary war at the battle of Yorktown, Va.
Odysseus embodies the characteristics of an epic hero in many ways. One such way is that he was that he was born to be a king. Most epic hero’s are born into a royal family. Another reason that Odysseus is an epic hero is because he can complete tasks that most commoners could not. For example, he defeats a gigantic, angry, human-eating cyclops without its neighboring brothers noticing.
Cyrus the Great, also known as Cyrus II, began ruling after the death of his father, Cambyses, in 559 B.C (Frye, 2016). While Cambyses was a noble leader, his son succeeded him in expanding the empire and creating what is now known as the Achaemenid dynasty (Evans, n.d). The Achaemenid dynasty, or Ancient Persian Empire, was not created over a set of days, weeks, or months. Cyrus conquered significant portions of land for many years before being able to establish the great dynasty. But, Cyrus could not have conquered on his own; he needed followers to assist him in battle and
As a soldier he was brave and courageous, which is how he led his people to victory at the Battle of the Alamo. He took a risk of losing men when he launched a violent assault on the Alamo mission and killed all 180 Texan occupants. He also took a risk when he fought against the mighty Spain in Tampico. According to the article titled “Antonio López de Santa Anna” (1996), “The Spanish forces were superior in numbers, equipment, and training, and Santa Anna's initial attacks were parried. However, with fierce persistence, he fought the Spaniards all summer, keeping them bottled up in Tampico.” He came out victorious and became known as “Conqueror of
For instance in 881 “A sea battle was joined: there was savage fighting everywhere.” The Vikings were killed and all their ships were captured on the way home Vikings from East Anglia attacked and ultimately had victory over Alfred’s army. Alfred actually paid them off before to avoid being attacked, which does not seem like something Charlemagne would do. According to his track record Charles the Great probably would have ordered his men to fight, but he never had to deal with naval threats. Although he didn't have the same type of threats he still successfully won many of his military undertakings. It would not be presumptuous to say that Charlemagne is definitely a leader in warfare in comparison to
Simon Bolivar fought for 15 years for independence, he never gave up. Simon Bolivar took a stand against a tyrannical leader to fight for freedom, gain independence,and liberty. He stood up to a corrupt government that was under the power of french leader Napoleon. Simon Bolivar’s stand for freedom was one of the greatest of all time, Bolivar led many battles, many failed but those that succeeded changed the way of life in South America. Simon Bolivar saved and freed six South American countries, from the Spanish