As well as fighting for Ithaca as a good deed, Ody did many more and went above and beyond to fulfill these deeds. For example, Ody risked his own life to save his men from Circe. He did not know what he would be coming face to face with, but from what Eurylochus had told Ody and the crew as he ran back, it was a terrible sight and he could barely tell it because he was so frightened. This proved that Ody was an epic hero because Ody was going to stop at nothing to save his crew, no matter what challenge he was about to face. As Ody tried to make it home, he had to travel to many different places until he could finally reach Itaca.
Alexander the great did spread greek culture and was very brave. Alexander the great was indeed brave and brilliant when it comes to military things but was everyone that called him great heros themselves. Some people that called him great do not think anything bad of him because they were just as ruthless and bloodthirsty as he was. Alexander and his men were bloodthirsty and ruthless just like the rest of his men.
Temple defines heroic virtue as “arising from some great and native excellency of temper or genius transcending the common race of mankind in wisdom, goodness, and fortitude.” Temple’s definition of the virtues of a hero were deemed credible during his time, and provide basis to the argument I am providing to vilify Alexander the Great. Taking Temple’s definition apart piece by piece, he claims that a hero’s “transcendent virtue and goodness” will benefit all of mankind in the institutions of “law, orders, and governments” and will be beneficial to a “civil society.”
First of all, one reason that Alexander was great was because he was a military genius. He was a genius because he conquered so much land and did not stop. In document B it states, “That Alexander made a plan to trick Porus by acting like he was going over the river by making
Alexander was a villain because he kills family and did what had already been done. Alexander was a villain because he left the government undeveloped. Alexander focused more and conquering land than developing the land. Alexander died, the empire fell apart making the war unnecessary. Alexander could convince his men to do the craziest of things “Yet he never developed a successor.”
I had to kill him to save everyone. I loved him, but Rome’s well being was more important to me than Caesar’s life. Q: Brutus, what swayed you the most to join Cassius’ plan? A: The thing that swayed me the most was the letters from the people of Rome that my servant found.
Alexander created a legacy for himself that stood the test of time. He made men believe he was a god and he believed it himself. It was due to accomplishing tasks no other great leader had done before him. Alexander expanded his empire further east than any before him. He crossed deserts that seemed uncrossable and he surpassed all before him in military greatness.
Was Julius Caesar a hero or a villain? Was he greedy for land and money or was he just trying to help the Roman Empire? I believe Julius Caesar was a hero and a reformer because of all the astonishing things he did to help the citizens of the Roman Empire. First of all, Julius Caesar was an unbelievable military leader and emperor.
Alexander the Great is an important figure in my opinion, even though he had very short reign, he accomplished many things which other kings didn’t. By leading his people, Alexander created one of the biggest empires in the world, while remaining undefeated in battle. He first started with the destruction of Thebes, after hearing false reports of the death of Alexander, the people of Thebes decided to revolt against the Macedonian garrison. However they were wrong, Alexander was alive and because of their betrayal he destroyed the city apart from the house of Pindar, killed the soldiers, took the women and children. He did this to show people what would happen if they rebelled against him.
I would also consider Brutus a traitor when he lied to his fellow citizens. he lied to them in order to kill Caesar butt from seeing this part one might believe Brutus is a traitor. this is due to the fact that even though he was on this side of Rome and her people, Brutus left them out thus betraying his own people and leaving him a betrayer. finally one might suspect brutus to be a traitor killing the Emperor. surely killing one 's King means they 're a betrayer right?
Antipater was not very happy with Alexander the Great for this decision as well as killing one of his companions Cleitus. Antipitar saw an opportunity to poison the great Alexander as he was at his weakest point. Antipitar then collected the poison from the styx river and made a plan to kill Alexander the Great. After he collected the poison, “Antipater sent with his son a draught toxic water that was collected from the legendary river Styx.” Antipater sent his son to a party that Alexander the Great had to attend.
Most ancient rulers are called ‘The Great’ because they are the first in their family to rule. However, Alexander the Great was not the first in his family to rule yet he still received the title. Although he was only ruler of the empire for twelve years, he was still a great leader and earned the title he has now because in that time he deployed new technologies and equipment which helped him expanded the empire to as big as it ever was and defeat the Persians as well as many others. There are some people that disagree and don’t think he earned this title but others do think he was truly a great leader. He improved and strengthened the army he inherited from his father and treated them with respect.
There has been many great leaders in our history, but the one that outshone everybody was Alexander the Great. His father was King Phillip and his mother was Olympias. To this day he has had the largest empire in the world and was a successful ruler. So the real question here is how great was Alexander the Great? During his lifetime people would question if Alexander if he showed enough leadership, courage, and intelligence to be called great.
Alexander v.s. Alexis, Power Hungry or Ill Witted Alexander the great, undefeated, but when put into question does he hold up against competition. Alexander the Great was a superior military leader, conquering almost al l of the Eastern continent and was undefeated the whole time. Alexis tsipras just recently resigned from office after what is said to be one of the worst terms in Greece 's history.
The Roman soldiers however were successfully able to defend their territory, although new trouble was starting with Germans. Alexander Severus headed North to join his soldiers defending Rome against the Germans. He had multiple ships built to carry his army to fight, but he knew by now that he was not a very good general and hoped the Germans would be to scared to fight. The Germans did agree not to fight, as long as they were paid large sums of money. This angered and embarrassed the Romans.