Alexander The Great And Genghis Khan Comparison Essay

Alexander the Great, the man who spread Hellenism, and Genghis Khan, the infamous savage, are not only viewed as exceedingly different, but are in fact polar opposites. While some views of the leaders may be inaccurate and biased, such as the belief that Genghis is inhumane and savage, the differences between their lives and beliefs are still vast. Alexander was a great general, and lead many people to fight for him, however he lacked in domestic leadership and stability within his empire. Genghis on the other hand was a fierce fighter, who obliterated his enemies, but kept a stable and safe empire for his people. Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan are vastly different due to how and why they lead their people, and fought against others. Alexander

After Alexander’s death his empire was fought over and crumbled not long after his death. In stark contrast, Temujin’s empire flourished, and even reached its most powerful point after his death. In total, while Alexander lead a powerful army, his empire did not have a good foundation, unlike the Mongolian empire, which lasted from 1206 until 1920. But, not only was Temujin’s empire large, his bloodline was expanded through all the wives he took, and his tactics eventually causes “about 16 million individuals alive today” to share his Y-chromosome, meaning 16 million people are related to Genghis Khan.

Both the Mongolian Empire and Macedonian Empire are known as powerful ones, but they are also greatly different. The Mongolian Empire is known as one of the largest empires in history, second only to the British Empire. While the Macedonian empire was a smaller empire, it did give a good example of what Alexander was capable of. In general, since their empires were so vastly different, and since Temujin and Alexander had such different lives, they are more different than