Alexander, the young king of Macedonia, was the greatest military commander in all of history to ever to drive an army into battle. He was not only inspiring, but he also patient, brave, clever, and never went into battle without strategic planning, which is what made him The Great Alexander. He believed he could unite people, through the sheer force of his will, and he did just that. Alexander the Great also conquered huge territories during his reign. Why was he so successful? Alexander was successful in his conquests due to his superior tactics.
During his lifetime, Alexander made many outstanding achievements, based on his strong beliefs, towards the growth and protection of Greece. Of all his accomplishments, his advancement in military
…show more content…
He began his military training under his father’s request, who was at the time leading Macedonia to victories fighting Ancient Greece. After the death of his father, Alexander did the unimaginable; he attacked Ancient Persia with just a little over 45,000 soldiers versus the 200,000 of Persia (Rufus, Quintus 169-175). Alexander began this Persian war in 334 BC during which he was only twenty-two years old. King Darius III, wanted to make sure that the battleground favored his army, so he can use his feared scythe-wheeled chariots. In order for him to use those chariots, he needed a level and flat ground, and so he ordered it to be made even flatter by ordering the terrain plowed and leveled. Alexander, being aware of this, took away King Darius’ advantage by ordering his army to shift to the right hoping to move the Persian army away from its leveled field.Unable to use their chariots on the rugged terrain, the Persian army was thinned from the front and the rear and so Alexander took charge from the rear, causing Darius to run from his army, giving victory to Alexander (Green, Peter 82-87). Although, capturing Persian properly, Darius was on the run. Before Alexander could get to Darius, Bessus, who was Darius’ trusted general, killed Darius, to claim himself as the new Persian Emperor. Alexander pursued Bessus into northern Bactria, essentially claiming the region …show more content…
Between each land and city they traveled, he made sure there was a solid supply chain, he also sustained food, weapons, and communications. Throughout his travels, he took with him engineers, doctors, poets, scientists, slave traders and most importantly, a historian, who wrote up his achievements which were then sent far and beyond so his name would be always cherished (Foreman, Laura 34-41). During time of battle, he led his men from the front lines, where he was easily seen by the opposing commanders. This made it easier for the enemy to know where to strike the most and where to avoid sending their forces. This also provided inspiration for his troops, giving them hope no matter what the outcome of the battle will turn out to be. He was continuously showing his army what it meant to be courageous and was injured many times, but he continually pushed himself to harder and harder beyond the limits. He once said that: 'It is a lovely thing to live with courage and to die leaving behind an everlasting renown '. He was keen and perceptive in military strategy and also one of the greatest at analyzing the battlefield, taking it to his advantage, no matter how small his forces may be. In spite of being surprised by Darius ' strategic tactics, Alexander showed cleverness of mind by having his army arrive at the battlefield before the enemy had a chance to prepare their defenses or tactical
Alexander trained his troops from a very young age and worked them until they keeled over on the battle field. Being the warmonger that he is, Alexander fought battles one right after the other, with little break in between. Doing so put a burden on the troops; and in their hardest climbs, Alexander cowered. In an article written by Ian Worthington, he states, “In 334 Alexander III left home for Asia, entrusting to Anitpater as guardian…a stable-for a while-Greece and Macedon. The king also unilaterally made Anitpater deputy hegemon in the League of Corinth.
How Great Was Alexander the Great? Alexander the Great was the son of Phillip II who was assassinated after conquering the Greeks. Alexander became king at the age of 20 and right away began to expand. He began by crushing a Greek revolt in Thebes and gained the respect from the rest of the Greeks not to rebel.
He got a lot of his mindset from his parents and Achilles, his mentor and trainer. Have you ever wondered what makes people a hero or villain? Alexander was the king of Macedonia. He conquered millions of square miles of land in Asia and Europe. Alexander
He also respected his empire. Alexander would honor his empire even if he was outnumbered. He still wanted to fight because be believed that they
Alexander III of Macedonia inherited an empire that included the kingdom of Macedonia and the city-states of Greece. He was a very cruel and harsh leader. Almost immediately, Alexander set out to conquer the Persian Empire. He achieved his dream when he was 30 but then died a few years later. Alexander is one of the most famous people in history.
Alexander The Great’s title of “The Great” was not an exaggeration. To earn the title of “The Great”, you must've done some extremely good things as your reign as a king, queen, or emperor. Alexander The Great did many great and powerful things during his lifetime. He established an extremely powerful military, and he knew how to strategically conquer land, and he was interested in turning this conquered land into powerful areas.
I focus on the challenge that his father Phillip left him. "Philip and his friends looked on at first in silence and anxiety for the result, till seeing him turn at the end of his career, and come back rejoicing and triumphing for what he had performed, they all burst out into acclamations of applause; and his father shedding tears, it is said, for joy, kissed him as he came down from his horse, and in his transport said, 'O my son, look thee out a kingdom equal to and worthy of thyself, for Macedonia is too little for thee' " (Alex. 6.8.). He was lead to believe that the cause of His life was to be the greatest leader and conqueror of all time. Alexander the Great's legacy is both far reaching and profound.
When Alexander fought the Persians his men were behind him because they hated the Persians and loved their leader. Now they couldn’t tell their leader apart from their enemy as he assimilated so well with the foreign cultures. Alexander the Great is regarded as one of the most brilliant military minds ever, and his tactics are still looked back on today. His siege warfare was revolutionary and his battle lines with cavalry and auxiliary proved to be undefeatable. Conquering the largest amount
So was the link he had with this horse that after its death, several conquered cities were named after him. His conquest began the 335 b.C after he was named Hegemon and finished with the rebellion in Greece. Although his army wasn’t as numerous as the Persian Empire’s one was, the soldiers of Darius III, Alexander’s strategy was to end with the nation as soon as he could. All the Persian cities seemed to oppose to the conquest because of the benefits and well-being they were having thanks to the economic policies imposed by the nation.
A reader may think that Alexander is good but others may disagree. As Alexander grew older he conquered many places and achieved many goals. At the age of eighteen he was left in charge of the Macedonian Army, while in charge he never lost a battle. Throughout his experience of leading the Macedonian Army he spread Greek culture all over the Mediterranean.
Alexander the Great and the Macedonian Empire dominated the ancient world from 336 to 323 B.C. through military force and cultural exchange. The army of Macedonia had achieved an abundance of success due to Alexander's ability to provide his militaries with the best weapons, instill the training needed to perform battle formations and endure battle as well as the attitude needed to overcome adversity such as being outnumbered by the Persians. Despite conquering various lands, Alexander the Great chose not to impose his rule, but rather embrace certain customs, in order to spread Hellenism and eliminate the perception of being foreign; the process of unification impacted western civilization by mixing the people of Macedonia with other conquered
Describe the steps that Alexander the Great and his mother took to ensure his rise to power. Alexander and his mother took many steps to ensure his power as king of Macedonia. One of the first steps he took was to have a great education. Secondly, Alexander may have gotten his father killed by his bodyguard.
Glorious men have graced the earth and have left significant impressions on the following generations. Alexander the Great suits that profile like none other. As arguably one of the most influential military leaders in history, Alexander conquered the majority of the known world, including large-scale empires such as the Persian. Succeeding his father, Philip II, to the throne at the age of 20, Alexander commanded an already skilled military, which he schooled further in the beginning of his reign. Even militarily significant empires had no chance against Alexander 's military brilliance and so he constructed one of the largest empires in history.
He was doing an outstanding job, out doing almost everybody . He was undistracted and had no fear which are two keys into having a successful era according Machiavelli. Now discussing Alexander 's campaign, he as well had a swell campaign having an extraordinary run of domination himself. Alexander the Great earned that name for a reason. He was king of Macedonia, subdued Greece, crossed Hellespont against Persia, defeated Darius, then made himself master of Asia, and invaded India.
Alexander the Great was the king and renown general of Macedonia. He led the Greek army against Persia and used many bold tactics in battle. Alexander the Great significantly expanded the Greek legacy by conquering territories. When he conquered a territory, he would not force the locals to assimilate into the Greek culture. This is to ensure they would not rebel against his leadership.