The life of Caesar was short, yet incredible. It is imperative to find out about this extraordinary man and is numerous achievements. Julius Caesar was a politically adroit and prevalent pioneer of the Roman Republic who fundamentally changed what ended up known as the Roman Empire by significantly extending its geographic reach and building up its majestic framework. By age 31, Caesar had battled in a few wars and wind up engaged with
Some events in human history cannot be linked to a common sense whatsoever. Historians often cannot answer why something was ought to begin in the first place. Great example will be one of those occasions when a couple of Greek city/states consolidated and crushed the attack power of the gigantic Persian Empire. The Greeks could win the Greco-Persian War due to their maritime triumphs over the Persians, a couple of key triumphs ashore, and the reason for which they were battling. The maritime triumphs were the most essential commitment to the general accomplishment against the Persians.
Even militarily significant empires had no chance against Alexander 's military brilliance and so he constructed one of the largest empires in history. After his early death at the age of 33, Alexander left behind a vast empire stretching from Greece to northwestern India. In addition to his empire, however, Alexander also left a lasting impression on the world as a military leader and king. Even today Alexander remains a respected historical character, considering that his military strategies are still used in modern warfare. This paper thus attempts to answer the question what lasting impacts Alexander the Great had on future generations.
He used his honorable position to launch a project his father had previously planned. The plan was called “Panhellenic project” and it was to lead the Greeks on a conquest to rule all of the land including Persia. He invaded the Achaemenid Empire in 334 BC,
Constantius and Galerius were promoted to Caesar and eventually to Augusti. Constantine benefited greatly from his father’s promotion and his duty fell to the battlefield (Lenski, 2006:59-60). After his father’s death in 306 A.D, there became fierce competition between him and Maxentius for the role of emperor.
After King Philip’s death, many countries under the control of Macedonia started to rebel and try to gain independence. Alexander quickly invaded Greece and showed that his authority would be respected. He then did the same thing to Thrace, establishing himself as an authority figure now known to all countries. Alexander then sought out to conquer all of Asia. At this time alexander was 22 years old.
The Greeks played an important role in the foundation of Western Civilization’s political science (Wolfe 1). Behind the establishment of democracy lies a legacy filled of empowerment, strategic leadership, and loyalty that lead to the ultimate victory of political freedom. There were many Greeks however, who opposed and argued against democracy, but for the Athenians it’s what made Athens great. Athenians enjoyed a life enriched with their views of freedom, believing this is what allowed humans to reach their fullest potential (8). Political freedom did not come easy, yet was birthed from a war that changed the course of Civilization worldwide.
The tendency of the mind is described as follows: "For him who has conquered the mind, the mind is the best of friends; but for one who has failed to do so, his mind will remain the greatest enemy." This goes on to explain that the greatest strategists are who they are because of their controlled mind, since strategies have existed ever since the human mind was known. The word “strategy” originates from the Greek word “strategos” which means “a general”, “army”, “lead” or “plan of destruction of one’s enemies”. Writers like Tolstoy, Shakespeare and Montesquieu had developed strategic concepts which were then actually used by Napoleon, Hitler and Machiavelli. The Greek philosopher Socrates had once comforted Nicomachides, a militarist after being defeated by Antisthenese, a
An advantage could only really be obtained by superior fire power and a ships craftmanship instead of strategy. This, for a long time, kept British at the forefront of naval warfare in the centuries leading up to the 20th century because not only did they have better cannons, but they also had much better ships then every other nation at that time. Mahan believed that U.S naval power was the only way to gain world power. To do this the U.S would need a bigger navy, this is where fleets came into play. President Theodore Roosevelt clearly believed in Mahar’s ideas and this is seen when Naval Heritage and History writes about The Great White fleet saying, “Roosevelt felt that a successful cruise of this magnitude would provide the American people with an example of US naval preparedness, strength and range.
Henry VII was born in 1457 and died in 1509. His son with Elizabeth of York: Henry VIII was born in 1491 and died in 1547. Both kings are incredibly famous and changed England beyond belief, but who was the better king? Let 's find out… Firstly, in terms of relations with foreign countries, I believe Henry VII was better. He took a non military/ no war approach to dealing with foreign affairs while Henry VIII took a more confrontational approach, for example his invasion of France.