Alexander the Great has been regarded by many historians as a great person. Many historians say that he spared some people. Since he spared only some people, many other people were dead or killed because of him. Alexander the Great wasn’t great at all. He was a greedy and insensitive human. Alexander is seen as a superior person, but that was only because of his father. His father put many long months developing the army, but when he passed it to Alexander, Alexander called his father’s army his own. Alexander does not deserve that achievement. The credits should have gone to King Philip and the Macedonian army. Alexander was a ruthless person. He destroyed many cities. In some cases, he erased pieces of history. Alexander didn’t allow anything to stand in his way. If it did, he would demolish it just for the fun of it, and this went for not just buildings. He even mistreated his loyal advisors. Alexander was a mean conqueror in history. It is estimated that Alexander slaughtered over one hundred thousand innocent men and enslaved tens of thousands of innocent women and children. He …show more content…
He wanted to capture all of Asia. He decided to conquer India. Alexander came and thrashed India. There were 3 years of ruthless killing of Indian people. The attack claimed 80,000 Indian lives “Alexander The Great." Ancient History Encyclopedia. Alexander then sold Indian women into slavery. Also, when Alexander was fighting with King Porus of India, he killed many Indian natives who resisted and attempted to flee. When Alexander was conquering India, he met the Brahmins to learn Hinduism. After getting what he wanted to know, he executed the Brahmins. Alexander wanted to keep on conquering and capture the entirety of India, but his men were put under horrible weather conditions to fight and started a revolt. Alexander had to cut short his plan and angrily left India. Discovering Our Past: Ancient
Alexander the Great, son of Phillip the second, was a mighty Macedonia king who came close to conquering the entire civilized world of his day. Shortly after succeeding the throne, Alexander began the dynastic purging of his enemies. Alexander was extremely ambitious and aspiring. Alexander died in 323 BC and his empire stretched from the western edge of modern-day India to Egypt! Alexander not only created a vast empire, but he also helped begin the flow of cultural diffusion throughout his conquered lands.
In addition, in the Legend of the Hat Band, he rewarded an innocent person who had done a service to him by killing him, showing that he relied so much on the legends that he was willing to kill a loyal soldier because it was thought that he might be a threat. He cared so much about legends that he was willing to sacrifice one of his own men. This does not seem like the act of someone ethical or wise as a great leader should be. A third reason that Alexander should not be considered great is that he used brutal methods to conquer land.
Despite Alexander not being politically great, society remembers him as great because of his military prowess
He had very high standards at a very young age and surpassed those standards instantaneously (“Alexander the Great Biography”). One can infer that many looked up to Alexander and respected him. God believes that everyone is created equal; no matter if one is a slave, or a pawn, or a king, they are all equal in the eyes of God. However, when the time came, both of these people died.
Throughout history, there has been great military leaders come and go. Although, one of the most well-known conquerors is Alexander the Great. Many people thought he was a good leader and a good king. However, the people he conquered think otherwise. The people who supported him say he was compassionate towards others.
(Doc. B). This empire had not messed with him or affected him conquering land, but Alexander saw an opportunity and jumped at it first chance he saw. Alexander did not think about the negative affect that was created by him conquering all this land, he just saw the opportunity to become more powerful, and make his empire one of the biggest. He wanted to set a legacy for himself, and did not care about how everyone else was
(Alexander The Not So Great 4) When he died, the people of his empire went into a 50 battle for control ultimately destroying the empire. Alexander was a villain because he was a terrible planner, he only cared about war, and he killed of any potential future leader from his kingdom. Some people say Alexander was a hero because he is great at conquering land. Alexander won many battles in the east by using his military genius resulting in capturing land for Greece. By the time Alexander was 30, he had conquered over 2,000,000 square miles of land spanning on 3
For example, when a sailor found Alexander’s hat that had fell into the water, Alexander ordered his head to be cut off because “he should not allow the head that had worn the royal head band to be safe.” (Doc D). However, Alexander the Great’s empire, influence, and generosity to others do show that overall, Alexander the Great was an amazing
Alexander The Great deserves none. This young Macedonian King was truly
He was determined to uphold his fathers dream and take control of Persia. Alexander was considered strategic in his battles and wasn’t scared to go first before his army into war. His appreciation and sympathy for religion and his troops is what makes him such a heroic leader. By these
When he encountered Porus at the Hydapses River, he engaged with him in an interesting way. Alexander realizes he cannot cross over the to where Porus was because of his numerous amount of elephants. Alexander decided to trick Porus into battle, and while he did that, he would take Porus’ elephants and use them as his own weapon. (Arrianus, document B). Alexander uses his creativeness to defeat an opponent in a way that would be difficult today.
“Finally, at the Indus River in western India, Alexander was stopped - not by an enemy, but by his own army, which refused to go further” (BGE). Also after they conquered a place that is now Pakistan, some people didn’t go back with Alexander (Doc F). When Alexander was pushing into India and his own army stopped him that situation shows that they didn’t have enough trust to follow him any further. Also after they took over the place that is now Pakistan some of his troops didn’t go back. This shows that they might not have had any more trust in Alexander, or they thought he was getting too
Alexander became king of Corinthian League by eliminating his enemies. Alexander’s ego and reputation was very important to him. He inherited one of the largest empires by battling and over taking other kingdoms. He used his honorable position to launch a project his father had previously planned. The plan was called “Panhellenic project” and it was to lead the Greeks on a conquest to rule all of the land including Persia.
Another reason why he was a villain because he killed members of his family so that he would become the ultimate successor to the throne. This should never be how a king becomes the ruler of his kingdom, ever. Even though I believe that Alexander the Great is a villain, others may think he was a hero. They may think that because he had conquered so many other nations.
After his early death at the age of 33, Alexander left behind a vast empire stretching from Greece to northwestern India. In addition to his empire, however, Alexander also left a lasting impression on the world as a military leader and king. Even today Alexander remains a respected historical character, considering that his military strategies are still used in modern warfare. This paper thus attempts to answer the question what lasting impacts Alexander the Great had on future generations. In doing so this paper will examine three aspects of Alexander the Great: his personality, his military skills and, lastly, the resulting cultural impact of his conquests.