Son: Are we to debate his claim of divinity now, Father? Alexander adopted Persian customs, and they do not see prostrating themselves as an act of worship to a god. To the Persians he is a mere king. It is our Macedonian traditions that view him as a god when he does this. Therefore, I do not believe Alexander is looking to be worshipped as one. To claim himself as son of Zeus is for propaganda. With his claims comes loyalty from those he has conquered.
Father: I do not believe he is using his claims of divinity for just propaganda. I think Alexander truly sees himself as a god, regardless of weather he deserves that title or not. Since childhood Alexander has been influenced to believe he will one day be seen as divine. Leading by example
…show more content…
Look around you son, the evidence is everywhere. Emulating and overtaking his supposed ancestors Heracles and Dionysus has always been a goal of his. In 326, it was the Rock of Aornus that Alexander was intent on capturing, something Heracles had never of been able to do. Surely outdoing the demi-god was a way to boost his own status amongst his men. Indeed it may well have been Aristotle who installed in him the belief that he will one day be a god, as he once wrote the man who is king in the fullest sense is ‘as a god among men’. As his tutor, pushing these views upon a young, impressionable Alexander would have been inconceivable. I have one more example before you speak, son, and that is the trip to Siwah. Although there is a large degree of uncertainty of exactly what happened when he consulted Ammon’s oracle, I focus on the reasons for the visit and the effect it had on Alexander’s own self-perception. I believe Alexander visited the temple not only to outdo his predecessors but to create an elaborate account of his divine origins21. It seems that after this visit he began to associate himself with the Egyptian god Ammon, even goes as far as claiming to be a son of his. To discard the late Phillip as his father and claim such a divine connection is something we Macedonians do not take lightly. To not see the importance of this son, and the extent Alexander was willing to go to believe …show more content…
In the Greek states there were many who were bent on winning Alexander’s favour, and may well have issued the visit of the theoroi, unbeknownst to him23. In any case, father, I believe the belief Alexander had in his own divinity was the shroud he needed in order to effectively rule his newly conquered empire. Without it, he may not of been as respected, nor had as many loyal Persians. Instead, however, of fusing the races, it has driven Macedonians and Persians further apart in regards to their views of Alexander. If our argument on divinity has gone far enough might I say, I shall now propose a topic in which fusion was a main goal of Alexander’s. To have fusion in the army was one of Alexander’s best strategies to strengthen and increase
Alexander’s military brilliance was unquestionable. He was a leader invincible in both, siege warfare and set battles. In addition to that, his intelligence and communications skills were immaculate. The Roman historian Arrian, in his account Alexander Puts Down a Mutiny, explains Alexander’s ability of communication and leadership skills, “[M]arching out from a country too poor to maintain you decently, [I] laid open for you at a blow, and in spite of Persia’s naval supremacy, the gates of the Hellespont. My cavalry crushed the satraps of Darius, and I added all Ionia and Aeolia, the two Phrygias and Lydia to your empire….
Alexandria is considered to be the best example of ALexander's successful spreading of Greek Culture. Alexander may have been somewhat known as a big-headed, narcissistic leader, so much so as to going as far as to say that he was the son of Zeus, the King of the Gods. But Alexander truly did deserve the title of “The Great”. To be great in history is not to be a nice, sweet person who is kind to everyone, but to be a smart ruler who knows what he wants and gets what he wants. To be great in history is a title that comes with a lot of speculation, but
I focus on the challenge that his father Phillip left him. "Philip and his friends looked on at first in silence and anxiety for the result, till seeing him turn at the end of his career, and come back rejoicing and triumphing for what he had performed, they all burst out into acclamations of applause; and his father shedding tears, it is said, for joy, kissed him as he came down from his horse, and in his transport said, 'O my son, look thee out a kingdom equal to and worthy of thyself, for Macedonia is too little for thee' " (Alex. 6.8.). He was lead to believe that the cause of His life was to be the greatest leader and conqueror of all time. Alexander the Great's legacy is both far reaching and profound.
What can we learn about Alexander the Great’s military organization? How does Alexander use the military structure to provide unity for his empire? How is he trying to change the relationship between Greeks and Persians in his army? Is he successful in forging unity? Why or why not?
Long ago, back into the time of ancient Greek, was a young 20 year old British Macedonian king called Alexander. He was a very brave, dauntless, and generous man to his followers. He had conquered a vast of land and made it his empire. He had found 70 cities and named most of them Alexandria. He spread Greek ideas and culture to the world.
His parents hired the philosopher Aristotle to educate Alexander in subjects such as politics, sports, and warfare. He grew a strong opinion of himself as the outcome of his education. He then concluded to the belief that he was a god. When Alexander’s father died, he inherited his army and his quest to conquer Persia. He successfully lead the army through the Persian Empire and conquered thousands of square miles
Did you know that Alexander the Great was one of the greatest conquers? Alexander was born in 358 B.C. and he lived in a kingdom in Greece called Macedonia. Alexander was the son of the King Phillip II, and Alexander became king. During his life, did Alexander show enough leadership, courage, and concern for others to be considered great? By these measures, Alexander was great for at least three reasons: military genius, inspiring leader, and spread of Greek cultures.
One reason why Alexander of Macedonia should be called Alexander the Great is that he was very influential. For instance, in Document E, it states that his empire was held together for a very long time after his death. It took him 11 years to build his empire, and it held together for 10 years. This shows that since he had a big influence on his people, they continued to follow his ways of life (E). In addition, for 1000 years, Greek was the official language of Jordan, in the Middle East (E).
So Great “But seen through Persian eyes, Alexander is far from "Great". ” (6-7) Through the eyes of Greeks, he was truly a great man who honored greek culture. But seen through the eyes of a lot of other major cultures and countries, he was a bloodthirsty madman who only had power and control on his
Alexander became king of Corinthian League by eliminating his enemies. Alexander’s ego and reputation was very important to him. He inherited one of the largest empires by battling and over taking other kingdoms. He used his honorable position to launch a project his father had previously planned. The plan was called “Panhellenic project” and it was to lead the Greeks on a conquest to rule all of the land including Persia.
The teachings of Aristotle impacted Alexander by showing his conquered provinces a sense of tolerance due to both generosity and political wisdom rather than applying an artificial scheme to all countries; the adoption of the division of power was incorporated to prevent the possibility of rebellion (6). However, despite implementing an improved political system, Alexander established himself as a liberator by using harsh force on rebellious cities and executing an individual with a powerful influence that threatened his control (1). In order to achieve his mission of unification, Alexander felt that the best method of instilling Hellenism was by abiding with their values; he adopted the dress of a Persian king at the court ceremonies in order to strengthen his relationship and appear less foreign toward the Persians (6). Alexander the Great devised various means for unification by proposing to relocate settlers, promoting intermarriage between Persians and Macedonians, and instituting equality towards military service by training the youth located in the East as Macedonian soldiers and teaching them how to use their weapons in order to become Hellenized barbarians after 5 years (6). Alexander the Great had significantly impacted western civilization by creating various systems in order to strengthen the overall influence of the Greek
Describe the steps that Alexander the Great and his mother took to ensure his rise to power. Alexander and his mother took many steps to ensure his power as king of Macedonia. One of the first steps he took was to have a great education. Secondly, Alexander may have gotten his father killed by his bodyguard.
The relationships between the Greek gods and mortals have always been complicated. The gods can be generous and supportive, but also harsh and destructive towards the humans. They claim to be all powerful beings with unlimited power and influence, but in truth, they are far more human than they are perceived. They meddle with human lives, not because they are wise, but because of their own selfish reasons. In Homer’s
After his early death at the age of 33, Alexander left behind a vast empire stretching from Greece to northwestern India. In addition to his empire, however, Alexander also left a lasting impression on the world as a military leader and king. Even today Alexander remains a respected historical character, considering that his military strategies are still used in modern warfare. This paper thus attempts to answer the question what lasting impacts Alexander the Great had on future generations. In doing so this paper will examine three aspects of Alexander the Great: his personality, his military skills and, lastly, the resulting cultural impact of his conquests.
Alexander the Great was the king and renown general of Macedonia. He led the Greek army against Persia and used many bold tactics in battle. Alexander the Great significantly expanded the Greek legacy by conquering territories. When he conquered a territory, he would not force the locals to assimilate into the Greek culture. This is to ensure they would not rebel against his leadership.