Tabinda Khalid BHS, Semester 5th
COCA COLA: In the video we can see that high machineries were there and only few technicians were on the machines then according to Marx the dependence of capitalists on labour class will decrease and they can exploit them easily.
There were huge machines at one place man has to come there for operating them (factories). Workers gathered at one place, there were separate departments for specific jobs. The concept of “Taylorism” can be clearly seen in the management of these factories. Each worker was highly specialized according to his or her task, there was a hierarchy and division of labour, there were different professionals for different task, we can see these divisions by the titles which had given to
…show more content…
There is innovation in the products, as there is one solution but filled in different packaging; aluminium cans, plastic bottles and glass bottles. Concept of alienation as proposed by Marx can easily be seen in the documentary, as workers are totally alienated from the products, they lost the ownership of the product, they haven’t full information about the product; they have knowledge about their own task.
As Marx has given the concept of alienation that hoe capitalist alienates worker by four ways:
Alienation from the act of working: In the past people work to meet the basic needs but now capitalism has forces the workers to do the monotonous task like machines, we can see in the video that some workers were doing just the task of putting the product in the boxes or just operating a single machine again and again, this is how the worker loss interest in his
…show more content…
Alienation from other workers: As we can see in the video that all the departments are separate, even the factories for manufacturing the raw material are at different places, so there is not any interaction between the workers. At some places only one worker is operating the full system and he has not any other worker to interact with.
Alienation from human potential: This point can be clearly seen in the video as the workers are doing monotonous task, by doing this they are not utilizing their other skills, they are just like cog in a machine. As well as they don’t have any full information about the product, their knowledge is limited to their tasks only. So there is no chance of the development of their other skills or building on the existing knowledge they currently have.
Another thing which we can see is that the factories for raw material are at different places, it increases the efficiency of task that one single thing is being manufactured at one single
Back in the gilded age, late 1800’s, there were big businessmen that changed our economy greatly: but the question is, were they really robber barons or captains of industry? These businessmen were the owners of industries that were very important economic activity in the time period. Though, they were involved in many ethically questionable practices. These practices included child labor, making illegal shortcuts, scams, and deals; plus, they also exploited many of their workers. According to the definitions of each accusation, theses businessmen of the gilded age should be considered as both robber barons and captains of industry, due to the way they have changed the economy, and also how they did so unethically.
Gilded age 1878-1889 was the age of fast growth of industry and immigrants in America history. The production of steel and iron rose radically than other time. In contrast, the Western resources increased such as silver,lumber, and gold. As well as the transportation also improved. Railroad develop and move goods from resources rich west to east.
Does business growth and success always acquaint to community growth and success? Bartow J. Elmore explores this question in his book, Citizen Coke: The Making of Coka-Cola Capitalism. Elmore looks at the price that the environment and the public has paid to allow Coke to rise into the power it is in today. With operations in “over two hundred countries and selling more than 1.8 billion beverage servings per day”(7), you simply cannot deny the influence and power that Coke has. Coke is a widely successful business, but their growth has come at a cost.
The ministry of industry helped keep everything organized and orderly, leading to a clean and easy industrial process. It is made evident by multiple events in history that small acts, though they may seem pointless, can help improve the state of yourself and bring you
In the beginning of the 19th century, the Industrial Revolution caused a massive economic spike from small-scale production to large factories and mass production. Capitalism became the prevalent mode of the economy, which put all means of production in the hands of the bourgeoisie, or the upper class. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels argue that capitalism centralizes all the wealth and power in the bourgeoisie, despite the proletariat, or the working class, being the overwhelming majority of the population. The manufacturers would exploit the common proletariat and force them to would work in abysmal conditions and receive low wages, furthering the working class poverty. “The Communist Manifesto” predicts that as a result of the mistreatment
The industrial revolution was a time of immense progress. It marked an era of technological advancements and a changing society, yet also a period smeared with unfair and unsafe working conditions. The history is filled with stories of people suffering, being injured, and even dying, all in the process of creating goods for the changing consumer culture. Thousands looked past the suffering, condoled themselves with the goods they purchased at economical prices all at the expense of the working class, a class that had no other choice than to work in the dark, dangerous factories to feed their family. While the consumer culture in this time could look past the anguish of those in the working class, progressives could not.
In Andrew Ure’s “The Philosophy of Manufactures,” he shows his support for the Industrial Revolution. Ure believed that all of the improvements in technology made workers’ lives easier. The new technology allows workers to produce more products in less amount of time, which would equal greater productivity, which would then equal more wealth for companies and for the country. Ure makes an argument that the people who work in factories have better lives than those who live and work on farms, because of the advanced technology that factory workers have access to. Ure also presents the argument that factory workers are not necessarily treated unfairly just because they do not receive breaks while at work.
The difference in social classes shows how the Marxist analysis approach can be applied to Life in the Iron Mills. Social structure wasn’t always present in society, in fact towards the start of the human race, everyone was actually equal. Sure, there were the hunters and there were the gathers, but they realized they
Essentially, the worker does not control what he or she produces because the capitalists control it to ensure an increase of profit. In Alienated Labour, Marx explains that, “this relationship is at the same time the relationship to the sensuous exterior world and to natural objects as to an alien and hostile world opposed to him”(McIntosh 1997:18). He argues that the workers feels alienated form their own work because they know that they will be unable to reap the benefits (McIntosh 1997). An example of product alienation is how Z understand that he is digging tunnels to increase the production of the colony however is alienated because he does not receive any personal benefits of his work. The general stands in front of the entire colony and says, “We are the hero’s.
Because Marx believes the worker would “put his [or her] life into the [alien] object” (William, 132) he/she is producing, they are ultimately alienated, unconnected to
The third type of alienation is the worker’s estrangement from species-being or human identity. According to Karl Marx: “Estranged labour not only (1) estranges nature from man and (2) estranges man from himself, from his own function, from his vital activity; because of this, it also estranges man from his species.” (Marx 1844) Marx argues that work at our best, is what makes us humans. Therefore, the act of turning commodities into an entirely different product is not only the essence but the purpose of human being as well. To Marx, Human’s nature is not separate from activity or work, it includes the possibility
Organizational Behavior Issues in Engstrom Auto Mirror Plant Organizational issues Engstrom Auto Mirror Plant faces multiple quandaries associated with human behavior. Workers feel unappreciated as an integral part of the company, disposable and insignificant. Suspicion about bonus calculations, lack of transparency, job insecurity, and perceptions of inequitableness in the payment scheme have instigated uncertainty and open rebellion against the company. One of the core problems at the organization is low productivity.
The second, is alienation from the product. In Marxist time and in today’s modern world we are involved in an abundance of mass production. In a capitalist system, people are placed in a position where they are responsible in making a minor part of the goods. The goods of work belong to the capitalist and is sold for their profit, whereas the workers gain nothing. Therefore, Marx concluded that the greater effort the workers put into their job, the lesser they benefit.
When thinking of the positive effect of specialized labor, Marx suggested that it could bring solidarity to industrial workers (as citied in Sernau, 2012, p.46). Before labor division, it was probable that people worked individually with limited interactions with others in a similar trade. Now with specialized industrial work, workers have the opportunity to work in close proximity with others, thus creating bonds. Unfortunately, one of the downfalls of specialized labor is the possibility of generating deskilled workers. Marx believed that creating jobs that required little skills opened the opportunity to vulnerable and easily replaced workers (as citied in Sernau, 2012, p.46).
1.2. Product Differentiation This refers to differentiation that aspires to make a product more attractive by contrasting its unique qualities with other competing products (Investopedia, 2015:1), as in the case of Coca-Cola, other soft drink brands. Successfully adopting this strategy would have a company gaining a competitive advantage, as the customer would then view the product as unique or superior. This is what coca cola has managed to do, and has managed to do it on a scale that is globally unique, and globally recognized.