As each character in Oates’ works deals with violence and loss in their lives, their experiences with their family and with their own alienation are vital to their discovery of their own definition of justice.
While previous experiences with violence help characters decide how to avenge new violence, religion is the most formative in helping them decide if that vengeance is righteous.
Even though fear may paralyze some characters from taking action against those who hurt them, it ultimately motivates them to take action, even if that action is not in the form of revenge.
In order to discover how to properly get revenge on who hurt them or those they love, many of Oates’ characters experience alienation from their family, allowing them to form
…show more content…
Legs Sadovsky: She enters further into her role as a “bad girl” by stealing cars, pulling knives on those around her, and getting arrested. She is obsessed with communism and hates capitalist society. Her role as an androgynous young woman helps her blend into various situations. This week, her actions have been getting her into trouble and she seems to be drifting away from the original goal of FOXFIRE. (for more information, see Log 3)
Madeleine “Maddy-Monkey, Killer” Faith Wirtz: She is transcribing the FOXFIRE CONFESSIONS as an older woman reflecting but also living in the novel. Her feelings toward Legs go beyond normal friendship and hint at a lustful relationship. As her obsession with Legs grows stronger, she begins to hate the members of the gang. Furthermore, she has begun to detach herself more from the gang. (for more information, see Log 3)
Betty “Goldie, Boom-Boom” Siefried: She always speaks her mind about what is going on and Legs often puts her at the front of situations and relies on her for advice. She loves Toby, the liberated dog. (for more information, see Log 3)
Loretta “Lana” Maguire: She helps Violet get inducted into the gang but she does not play a major role. (for more information, see Log
Body Revenge 266 words Revenge has happen in both Jasper Jones and the Dressmaker when, Eliza a character in jasper jones, burned her own home down because of what her father done to Laura “ And there, right in front of me, the Wishart house is crackling furiously from the inside. It’s a single box of flames. Ribbons of red and orange lick at broken windows” (page 391), but it also has some comparisons to Tilly who, burned the entire town down because they are trash that needed to be burned (1:51:00 to 1:52:00).
The Genocidal Innocence Orson Scott Card’s Ender’s Game has sparked many controversial seminars that have produced numerous critical thinking questions. Were Andrew “Ender” Wiggin’s intentions actually good, and was his commited genocide actually guilty? Jon Kessel’s essay, Creating the Innocent Killer, brings up many points that the author of Ender’s Game tried to hide Ender’s crime by making the reader feel sympathy for his past. Many different essays argue that Ender has psychological damage from his past, has been manipulated into doing things he didn’t want to do, and also suffers from anger issue problems.
In “Vengeance is Ours,” Jared Diamond explores tribal societies’ views of revenge and compares them to our modern perspective by considering two detailed narratives. Diamond sets out to challenge the notion that the desire for revenge is “primitive, something to be ashamed of,” and instead suggests that such a feeling is natural and healthy (12). To accomplish this, Diamond tells the story of Daniel, a member of the highland New Guinea Handa clan, who orchestrates the paralysis of a rival clan leader, Isum, to avenge his late uncle, Soll. Upon doing so, Daniel exclaims “I have everything, I feel as if I am developing wings,” even though he didn’t release the virulent arrow himself (7). Diamond supplements this story with that of his father-in-law, Jozef, who, when given the opportunity to exact revenge on the man who brutally murdered his family during World War II, decided to place the murderer in the hands of the legal system.
While Dick and Perry’s random violence emerges, the perpetrators’ abhorrent criminality surfaces alongside the innocence of the Clutter family. Because Dick and Perry have no real reason to murder this specific family, their
Joy Kogawa's Obasan was able to reveal Canada's assumptions and moral values through the alienation of its main character, Naomi Nakane. Naomi's first encounter with the distancing effect of alienation when she is still a child. During school, one of her classmates tell her, The fact that a little girl is saying thi tells us that she may have heard this from her parents or other authority figures, which implies that some portion Canadian society assumes its own citizens are a
A murder from Tuscan, Arizona, during the 1960’s, Oates bases her story off these killings. In this essay I will argue that the most eminent approach
The novel demonstrates how trauma, parental figures, and an unstable environment are the fundamental causes of psychopathy. No matter who you are, traumatic events change your way of thinking. In the novel, Oryx is a visually attractive woman; she has the ability to easily persuade men through her charismatic and sexual nature. She never loved any of the men she’s been with, but tells them she does. These actions display key characteristics of manipulation and control that psychopaths have.
Moreover, when the Misfit and the two men shoot the whole family in the woods, it illustrates the sinister and cruel world that needs saving. The violent car crash that causes the family to encounter the Misfit in the first place adds to the violent display that O’Connor creates of the world. O’Connor uses the violence in the story to shock the readers into self-awareness (Larson 1). She uses this self-awareness to bring to light the religious theme of redemption and grace for the corrupted. O’Connor’s
Andre Dubus, short stories contain a common theme of revenge, morality, and justice. In “Killings” published in 1979, Andre displays the theme of revenge and justice through the development of characters, the title of the story, and the thrill of the suspense. Dubus neglects to take sides with the characters in the “Killings”, which leaves it upon the readers to make assumption whether the killings were justifiable. Dubus has a very unique style of writing, the main characters in “Killings” were given a choice that could’ve led them to a completely different outcome. Dubus keeps the readers on their toes because the opposite usually ends up happening.
While Odysseus’ actions taken to punish the suitors may appear immoral in modern society, by considering the ways in which modern society differs from Homeric society, Odysseus’ actions are just in the context of the poem. As violence has an extremely negative connotation in modern society, the use of the death penalty is morally ambiguous, and is a highly debated topic; however, violence is far more legitimized in the society of the Odyssey, and therefore, death is a far more acceptable form of punishment. This idea is exemplified by the way in which violence is discussed between characters within the Odyssey. In particular, this general acceptance of violence is demonstrated through the fact that many of the characters within the Odyssey share an almost unanimous belief that the suitors should be put to death to pay for their crimes.
Imagine if all the people you love are systematically being killed. If, out of the blue, you receive a call saying your neighbor is dead (while you are still grappling with the suspicious loss of your mother). This is exactly what happened during the Osage Reign of Terror in the early 1920’s. In chapter 7 of his book Killers of the Flower Moon; The Osage Murders and the Birth of the FBI, David Grann employs imagery, symbolism, juxtaposition, and syntax to create ethos and pathos in the reader. This allows him to evoke within them the terror and ever-present fear that the Osage people felt.
“They All Just Went Away” by Joyce Carol Oates is an amazing work. The language used is excellent, the presented descriptive details and events are exact and accurate. However the descriptions of the abandoned houses is upsetting. Still her essay helps the readers to define a family, home and a house and people’s relationships to each other. She did a remarkable job in presenting the stories about particular people and events that happens in each house.
Vengeance has been an ongoing problem for many centuries. In the long run, with the new generation, they have been following the same pattern to get revenge, without knowing the reasons why. If no one is willing to stop and think it over, to evaluate if it’s worth the risk, then the act of vengeance will be ongoing at the cost of many lives. Many people do not realize that having to avenge the death of a loved one will take so much time and patience in their lives. In the short story, “An Act of Vengeance,” by Isabel Allende, the issue involves a young girl who gets raped by Tadeo Cespedes, whom also killed her father on the same day.
According to Julia Kristeva “any crime, because it draws attention to the fragility of the law, is abject, but premeditated crime, cunning murder are even more so because they heighten the display of such fragility” (2002: 232). This essay argues, that Dexter is an abject, as he attracts and disgusts, and transgresses both moral and physical borders. These elements of abjection are established by means of the narrative, as well as by technical codes and mise-en-scène codes. The first indicator that shows an implication of the abject notion in this scene (Dexter.
THE VIRULENT ARROW: THE CAVEATS OF REVENGE IN THE MODERN STATE In “Vengeance is Ours,” Jared Diamond explores tribal societies’ views of revenge and compares them to our modern perspective by considering two detailed narratives. Diamond sets out to challenge the notion that the desire for revenge is “primitive, something to be ashamed of,” and instead suggests that such a feeling is natural and healthy (12). To accomplish this, Diamond tells the story of Daniel, a member of the highland New Guinea Handa clan, who orchestrates the paralysis of a rival clan leader, Isum, by a third party to avenge his late uncle, Soll. Upon doing so, Daniel exclaims “I have everything, I feel as if I am developing wings,” even though he didn’t release the virulent arrow himself (7).