Amanda Ripley's Essay: The Case Against High School Sports

There is a big debate going around about whether travel sports are necessary or not. Some people do not think that travel sports are beneficial because there is too much pressure or it costs too much. On the on the other hand, research explains how 96% of 1,250 actually enjoy playing a travel sport and it is very beneficial for them (Matz). Travel sports can be very beneficial because kids can have a better way of life, it can provide fitness, and kids can become great athletes. Travel sports are necessary because people can have a better way of life with the help of travel sports.

In 2013, Christopher Bell took the time to produce a documentary, Trophy Kids, in which he observed the lives of several teens whose parents pushed them into doing sports that they may or may not even wanted to participate in. More than 7.6 million American high schoolers a year participate in afterschool sports, many of them having parents who encourage them to continue for the sole purpose of receiving a scholarship in the future. Pushing young students to excel past their athletic limits risks their physical health, mental health, and emotional health as well as their relationships with human interaction due to elevated stress that results from the pressure. The documentary showcases four instances of parents who push their children

According to " The Case Against High-School Sports" (2013), sports could create some study, health, and time management problems for schools and students. In this post, Amanda Ripley initially shows the benefits when involving in the high-school sports: exercise, sportsmanship lessons, some positive personalities, more fun and staying away from vices. She also writes some tales to inform readers that in the US, students are interested and enjoy in sports more than other peers in other countries. However, she claims that the high-school sports have negative effects on schools and students. Next, she gave some schools ' examples to show the problems when schools and students spent too much time and money in high-school sports.

As a result, people loved watching Jackie on the olympics and made her loved all over the world. Jackie Joyner Kersee’s later years were filled with starts and ends. Staying proud, at the age of 38, Jackie retired from track and field (‘ JAckie Joyner Kersee biography”). After retirement, Jackie built the JAckie Joyner Kersee foundation in her hometown in EAst St. Louis (“JAckie Joyner Kersee Biography”). JAckie helped people with the athletic ability and convinced people to do sports (“Jackie Joyner Kersee Biography”).

Obviously, residential camps will cost more than day camps. It 's also true that residential camps offer greater opportunity for learning and training than day camps. It is important for parents to understand the costs associated with each camp and also to calculate those expenses against the goals and objectives in sending the youngster to that specific camp. Girls Basketball Camps Point Number Three: Reputation While you think about the price of each camp, you should also take into account the reputation of the camp itself as well as its counselors. There might be a wide variety of experience levels between camps, and a multitude of skill levels as well.

By mixing sports and academics, we tempt kids into believing that it’s O.K. if they don’t like math or writing — that there is another path to glory. Less obvious is that this path ends abruptly, whereupon they get to spend 50 years in an economy that lavishly rewards those with higher-order skills and ruthlessly punishes those without.” There is a reason each lesson is taught in school. And for schools to

Competition only makes children bound to be winners. It also discourages sportsman spirit. Instead of being a source of healthy growth, these competitive sports have started becoming the source of depression for children when they don’t fulfil the expectations of their parents. These sports should enhance the sportsman spirit in children and must be beneficial for their mental and physical health. Concentrating on winning or losing spoils the fun that games hold.

For example, she claims that educated parents fight for their kids in high school and they know what privileges to fight for. Parents also hover over their college-going children, according to a National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) this causes a remarkably effect on their children’s engagement and success (629). However, a few of her audience will most likely disagree because not every parent who has read her article had an education higher than a high school

True, it is valuable to have many different friend groups, but wouldn’t it be even better to have a permanent, sturdy friend group that stuck together no matter what? Negative peer pressure, somewhere along the way, has inflicted ‘The Floater’ in a way that has broken her trust. She can’t put her full trust into a group of girls because of the possibilities of the other vindictive roles mentioned in Wiseman’s article. Even though this peer pressure might have eventually helped ‘The Floater’ to see other possible friend groups, it still caused negative thoughts/actions leading up to gaining that

Amanda Ripley demonstrates the consequences for having school sports in “The Case Against High School Sports” because schools are spending too much money on their sports and can be solved. The author brings to the reader’s eye that sports cost way too much money and should be cut. I think Ripley is wrong because even though it cost a lot of money, they should still keep the sports. If they cut the sports, then it’s not fair to the students that are graduating because they could of had a chance to get a scholarship. If the schools cut the sports, then there is no chance for the students.