Ambiguity v. Generality
An ambiguous word is one that has multiple definitions and can only be understood in context. For example, the word “weight” is ambiguous because it carries different meanings depending on the context it is used in. According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, there are multiple definitions for the word “weight”. The first of which defines weight as the amount of how heavy a thing is, or how much it weighs. A different definition, however, for “weight” is a specific burden or pressure put upon someone. In order to understand the meaning of the word “weight”, context must be given. If I were to tell someone “my weight is 147 pounds”, it is more clear to them that I am using the word according to its first definition. Likewise, if I were to say “I have a weight of responsibilities this weekend”, it is more clear that I am using the word in coherence to its second definition. Thus in order to display the meaning of an ambiguous word, such as weight, to a listener, the speaker must give context and background information. An example of a more common ambiguous word is “rose” -- which can mean either a type flower, or the physical act of rising (in the past tense). A general word is one that applies to numerous other words. One may think the
…show more content…
The negation test is the first one: “that is not weight”. When inserting “weight” into the test, more information is needed to understand the meaning. What isn’t weight? The number on the scale when I step onto it, or the amount of work I have due that’s causing me a lot of stress? Since my hypothesis of “weight” is that it is ambiguous, the negation test is successful; I need more context to understand the word’s meaning. As for “ball”, to say “that is not a ball” is much clearer -- it means that the object handed to me isn’t a round or roundish body of
During America’s birth, Abigal Adam’s writes to her son, who is on a voyage to France. Whilst on a trip with his father, John Adams (the 2nd president of the United States) and his brother, Adams writes to her son in a letter. Adams manifests a gentle tone with steadfast flattery to emphasize how wisdom comes from experience Adam’s employs maternal flattery to boost her son’s confidence and put faith into her assertion on the importance of experience.
“uncertainties of the past and responsibilities of the future” In the search of progess to seek a better future, humans often find themselves struggleing with the uncertainties and unresolved issues of their past. A necessary action is needed to reconcile conflicts and questions that connect the realities of new or present moments. Ray Bradbury’s novel Fahrenheit 451 illustrates this way of thought and timeless matter of thinking through a dystopian society that clings to a distorted version of history while desperately keen on finding a sense of meaning and purpose. The experiences shown by the protagonist Guy Montag and the societies he occupies, represents the harm and danger of conformity, censorship, and free thought.
Emma Marris uses many types of persuasive elements in her essay “Emma Marris: In Defense of Everglade Pythons”. In her writing she persuades her readers that the pythons should be allowed to be in the everglades since it is not their fault that they are there in the first place. She uses metaphors to relate to the reader and word choice to enhance her writing.
This indicates an unreliable scale as the weight should never fall below zero grams. Furthermore, many of the same type of beans seemed to be different sizes (indicating different weights). Each bean of the same type should be the same weight. If the beans aren’t of a uniform weight, the mass of a group of ten brown beans could vary depending on what beans were weighed. If this is the case, then the calculations will not be accurate.
In Project #1, I chose to make a rhetorical analysis of a chapter from Jason Fagone 's book Ingenious: A True Story Of Invention, Automotive Daring, And The Race To Revive America, "How to spend your entire income building a car to travel 100 miles on a gallon of gas. " The first chapter mainly focuses on two main characters: Kevin and Jen. Mr. Fagone introduces us to them by telling us how they both met, grew up, where they went to school and what for, where they worked, and how they started working together on building the car for X Prize. Now, since my goal for this blog is to see my progress and journey to becoming a better science writer, I started reading the chapter over and over. In the beginning, I thought that "Writing for Science"
Ambiguity or fallacy of ambiguity is a word, phrase or statement, which contains more than one meaning. Ambiguity is usually a technique used in a text to generate confusion for the reader. For instance, " The Demon Lover” by Elizabeth Bowen is a short narrative that shows this previous characteristic, since it can be interpreted in several ways such as: it is a ghost story or it's simply about a mentally unstable protagonist ( Kathleen). Personally I believe it is just a story about a mentally unstable woman for reasons such as : trauma for having her husband lost and presumably dead, trauma for the war and several other descriptions in the text. It is important to state that losing a loved one, especially the person you share your life with, is a much dramatic if not traumatic event.
Weight and Truth, two terms with definitions that appear as simple and concrete ideas. Simply put, Weight is the measure of how heavy something is. Truth is a fact about an event or idea. However, in the Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried, a fictional novel about a squad of American soldiers in the Vietnam War narrated by a character who takes the author’s name, O’Brien uses his own definitions of Weight and Truth. The men carry physical and mental burdens both during and after the war.
In Florence Kelley’s heart wrenching call for awareness of child labor she uses quite a few rhetorical devices. An anaphora is the most recognizable as she’s trying to nail in how she would could be helping the children. Pathos is another of her persuasion methods used in her tone. Kelley also uses a fair amount of imagery throughout the passage. First and foremost, Kelley’s use of an anaphora is what really pulls the audience’s attention.
For example, the narrator repeatedly describes the weight of weight during the soldiers arduous journey: “Among the necessities or near necessities were R-38 can openers, pocket knives, heat tabs, wristwatches, dog tags, mosquito repellants, chewing gum, candy, cigarettes, salt tablets...2-3 canteens of water. Together these items weighted between 15-20 pounds” (O'Brien 470). Subsequently, the narrator and his companions embark on a perilous journey all while facing
They carry themselves with poise, while hiding shame, with "wistful resignation," "pride," "stiff soldierly discipline," "good humor," and "macho zeal. " They are all afraid to die but try not to show it. How is the idea of “weight” used and developed in the story? Explain O’Brien’s use of both the literal and figurative definitions of “weight.” Use textual evidence to support your analysis.
In the article by Hass and Flower they discuss how important rhetorical reading is in the way we construct meaning. I agree with them I believe it is important to have a better understanding of what you are reading. While I am someone who is guilty of just getting through a reading to paraphrase I do sometimes struggle with reading between the lines. Something Hass and Flower mentioned that I feel is important in this article is how reading is connected with the way we write. Hass and Flower go on to say that experienced readers understand both reading and writing are context-rich, situational, constructive acts and many students see reading and writing as information exchange.(Pg426)Therefore
Before the 20th century the horror genre was not as famous, but started to become popular in the 20th century with what some people think, the help of Henry James. The horror in the book keeps the reader on the edge of their seat wondering what will happen next, which is why I liked it. Filled with this curiosity ambiguity is used so the reader has to make their own conclusion of the book. In The Turn of the Screw, Henry James uses ambiguity in his book so the reader can arrive at what they want to believe in but at the same time question what they think.
You’re a Big Fat Phony!: Corruption in The House of the Seven Gables Appearances can be everything. In today’s society, especially, appearances are a major factor in how society views and values individuals. However, while one can appear to be high-principled and faithful, he or she can easily be deceiving the public in order to maintain his or her reputation. In The House of the Seven Gables, Nathaniel Hawthorne, through a collection of oxymoron, syntax, tone, rhetorical question, connotation, details, metaphor, and direct characterization, reveals the corrupt nature of Judge Pyncheon.
Ambiguity is the characteristic of a word, phrase, or book that can be understood in multiple ways. Henry James, during the middle part of his career, incorporated this type of vagueness into his writing. One of James's most debatable use of ambiguity was a ghost story. In the novella The Turn of the Screw, Henry James uses conflict, perspective, and ambiguity to create a mystery, with his own twist, for the reader to solve and leave them guessing. James, through conflicts involving the children and possible ghosts, limited point of view, and the overall ambiguity, forces the reader to solve mysteries throughout the book without giving the answers at the end.