Some people say that the Constitution is good; some say it is bad. The people who opposed the Constitution were referred to as Anti-Federalists. The most common reason that they did not support the Constitution is because they thought it gave too much power to the government. I am here to inform you about all the reasons that the ratification of the Constitution was good. First, you will need to know about how it all happened.
However, it was not mentioned in a colonial charter for an extended period of time. Later, the charters of Rhode Island, Connecticut, and the second charter of Massachusetts recognized and ratified the idea. It was later written into our constitution; Article IV, Section Four states “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government…". The principles of checks and balances and separation of powers also
“Time to Assert” contains several opinion based facts within the argument when describing how to deal with crime. Within “Time to Assert,” it comments, “A case like Michael Fay’s is important because it provides a chance to challenge an inhumane practice that ought not to exist anywhere” (Time to Assert 179). This quote from the editorial illustrates no true factual evidence and supports more of a biased argument that is heavily based on the editors opinions. The editorial implies no evidence that effectively helps with supporting the argument. According to “Time to Assert,” it explains, “The Fay case provides a legitimate opening for American citizens and companies to bring political and economic pressure to bear in the propagation of freedom and basic rights” (Time to Assert 180).
The Second Continental Congress was called on May 10, 1775 at the philidaphiaś State House. When the Second Continental Congress met it was to continue from where they left off from the First Continental Congress. The Second Congress managed the colonial war effort, and veered towards independence. The Second Continental Congress adopted the Declaration of Independence, which made the United States become a country. This all happened between 1775-1781.
In May of 1787 in the city of Philadelphia, 55 white men gathered together and created the document we know today as the Constitution. So how is it that a document made made over 200 years ago has managed to overcome the ruling of tyranny? Tyranny is the harsh and absolute power in the hands of an individual. The Constitution guarded against tyranny in several ways: federalism, the separation of powers, the checks and balances system, and large v. small states. The first guard against tyranny was federalism.
Role of each Branch of Government Power separation is one of the fundamental principal that the US Constitution is founded on. The functions of power separation technique are to maker sure that each arm of government has an active role in the creation, vetoing and reviewing of the statute. The structure of the legislative arm comprises of the senate and the house of representative that the framers of the constitution collectively referred to the Congress. The Congress is the primary body that makes the laws. The Constitution extensively explains its powers and roles.
The meaning of Article III was left open to interpretation. In 1789, shortly after the Constitution was ratified, Congress passed the Judiciary Act of 1789, which established the federal court system. Congress created a Supreme Court, three circuit courts, and 13 district court, one district court for each of the 13 states. The Constitution was not specific about the number of justices that could be appointed to the Supreme Court. Through the Judiciary Act, Congress provided for a Chief Justice and five Associate Justices.
After authoring the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson returned to Virginia, where, from 1776 to 1779, he served as a member of the Virginia House of Delegates. There he sought to revise Virginia 's laws to fit the American ideals he had outlined in the Declaration of Independence. In the presidential election of 1800, Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr to tied for first place with 73 electoral votes each. After a long and contentious debate, the House of Representatives selected Jefferson to serve as the third U.S.
The articles are the foundation for how the U.S government is organized. Article l, gives Congress limits and powers, giving them the right to make laws. Also, creates the Senate and the House of Representatives. Article ll, makes the executive branch which has the responsibility and authority for the administration. The executive branch is the President and executive officers.
Two days later,the second continental congress voted to adopt the declaration of independence,largely penned by Jefferson. On July 9,1776, the declaration,now with the approval of New-York, was read aloud in Philadelphia(O 'conner-30). The American government have strong constitution to protected their citizens on different issues as well as the divisions of government had a laws branches such as legislative,executive, and judicial branches assisted to the social policies. The executive branch is responsible for spending the government money the way congress is should be spent. This branch must also make sure that the people of the Unites States follow the laws that congress makes.
Antifederalists, on the other hand, believed that state governments should have more say, and that the government should be run by ordinary people (American Government, n.d.). In 1789, James Madison submitted 12 amendments to the constitution. These amendments were
The Judiciary Act established the United States Federal Judicial Branch. Many feared that establishing all judicial powers into a single court would leave the door wide open for tyranny. Not knowing that the three branches of government have a pretty good checks and balance system. The Act would give the Supreme Court
It is an expressed opinion that is protected by the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights of the Constitution. Johnson had full rights to burn the flag and say whatever he wanted about it or the government and it was his freedom to do so. Even though it is morally wrong and usually an unacceptable behavior, I believe that the Court did the right thing. They had to put aside personal beliefs and values and interpret the Constitution the way it was written even if it allows people to be a disgrace to the country itself. If the decision had gone in opposition to Johnson, there would have possibly been many upsets concerning people or groups that are very strong supporters of the freedoms that the