The Satori Case Study

• In determining whether there is a duty to arbitrate a dispute , the courts should not examine the merits of the underlying grievance, even if it appears to be frivolous. • In labor contracts with an arbitration clause, arbitrability is presumed unless there is positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible to an interpretation that covers the dispute. Doubts should be resolve in favor of coverage. • As long as an arbitration award is based on the bargaining agreement, a court should enforce the award without examination.

Johnny is not a tragic hero because his “honorable” motives were not sincere. For example, Valdez states “He didn’t want to go and yet he did. It never crossed his mind to refuse.” (Valdez 637-638). This quote shows how his intentions were not to serve the country, but just to have something to do.

Cases Case 20-1 Schoenberger vs. Chicago Transit Authority Facts Schoenberger applied and interviewed the CTA The person in charge of recruiting told him that he wanted to employ him for $ 19,800. The formal offer was $ 19,300.

Thus, since it is impractical to use a rigid moral system, both Weber and Sophocles discuss the importance of responsibility and consequences in decision making. This conception of responsibility and consequences is significant because it differs from a utilitarian quest for “the greater good”. When considering one’s responsibilities, it is inadvisable to cause pain to the individuals that a political leader is responsible for, regardless of the total pleasure it may lead to. In the case of Antigone, Creon’s decision leads to a tragic outcome because he does not take into account the consequences of his actions. His resolve to obstinately stick to his decision is his ultimate downfall.

As the consequentialist theory implies that one should make decision after calculating its repercussions on others, this case shows that some cases cannot fit into the consequentialist theory as every decision in business cannot be monitored and its consequences predicted accurately beforehand. A non-consequentialist theory judges the rightness or wrongness of an action based on the intrinsic value, not on its consequences i.e. morality is based on duty. Consequentialisim, however is a doctrine where your action is judged on the consequence it bears. Non-consequentialism hence denies the fact that the wrongness or rightness of our conduct is determined solely by the goodness or badness of the consequences it

By striking down the very notion of taking a stance to change the law, Atticus is proving that he is not entirely invested in his fight against racism, instead taking a defeatist attitude. His reply also demonstrates another instance of hypocrisy in the matter of combating prejudice: he turns his back on his belief in persevering regardless of the odds in this instance, acting apathetic towards change when it seems clear to him it will take too long a time to pay off. The cause he outwardly supports still benefits him in a way, of course, which is clear after the trial in which Atticus fails to keep Tom Robinson from being found guilty, when the blacks sitting in the colored section of the courtroom stand up to pay respect to him: “All around us and in the balcony on the opposite wall, the Negroes were getting to their feet”(211). Regardless of his failure, the black community admires Atticus for his efforts, but is portrayed meanwhile as unable to help themselves. That Atticus is depended on by the entire community for help, without any in-story hints that the African Americans are also contributing to their own cause, reveals that yet again he is considered the only “competent” person in the

Jim Casy’s alienation from society is a distinction between his individualistic ideals the unadaptable migrant workers who wouldn’t foresee his ideals. Ideally, he holds the philosophy in which he believes, “You can’t hold no church with idears like

Bettini v Gye (1846) 1 QB 183 - Bettini was in breach of warranty and therefore the employer was not entitled to end the contract. Missing the rehearsals did not go to the root of the contract. Coulls v Bagot’s Executor and Trustee Co Ltd (1967) 119 CLR 460 - This case considered the issue of privity of contract and whether or not a party was firstly a party to a contract and secondly whether or not they could enforce the contract where they had given no consideration.

When the king and the duke come to their end, Huck states, “human beings can be awful cruel to one another,” (Twain 239). The statement takes a tone of final acceptance that humans ability to care for one another and morality will never

Disturbed, Bernard attempts to manipulate his opportunity of success into coming out, “But you know quite well, John (how difficult it is to sound persuasive at the top of one’s voice!) I asked them to meet you on purpose.” When John refuses to be a project and present himself to the directors, Bernard is left in inferiority, right or lower than where he started. Then again, Marx feels seeks to put himself up from the discomfort of others, “Bernard felt himself at the same time humiliated by this magnanimity—a magnanimity the more extraordinary and therefore the more humiliating in that it owed nothing to soma and everything to Helmholtz's character.” Basically, the fact that Bernard had gained notice in society did not mean that he would find an identity, which was specifically what he envied about Helmholtz.

The Supreme Court held that an agreement that is “so consistently unreasonable that the question of reasonableness is foreclosed”, would qualify as a per se violation of the Act. Examples of per se violations include group boycotts and concerted refusals to deal. A group boycott is "a refusal to deal or an inducement of others not to deal or to have business relations with tradesmen. " A concerted refusal to deal is "an agreement by two or more persons not to do business with other individuals, or to do business with them only on specified terms."

Briefing Paper 1 A retail store placed in the Shopping Plaza in Newington, Connecticut, is be in possession of and managed by Lechmere, Inc. (Lechmere). Other stores situated between Lechmere 's stores and the parking lot. Lechmere has approximately 200 employees, all of whom do not belong to a union.

This demonstrates two issues, first they were acting for two or more employees and not for personal gain. In addition, they ever engaged in any form once of violence or a disproportionate loss or disruption to their employer relative to the seriousness of the employees’ complain grievance. However, the employer could manage to argue that the employee abandoned their jobs. However, as long as this was a concerted and lawful act, the employees are not required to offers the management with an opportunity to resolve a complaint. In addition, the decision would not be justified because it would be observed to be an Unfair Labor Practice (ULP).

Consol. School District the courts denied her claim of retaliatory discharge the reason being mutual trust and confidence between Procunier and Jennings were essential to the proper functioning of the workplace and Jennings’ discharge was based upon a loss of trust and confidence by Procunier, which was reasonable under the circumstances. 4. How do you legally defend your recommendation? a.

Tokugawa Ieyasu, a Japanese warlord, victor of Japan’s civil war and the shogun of Japan in the early 16th century. Ieyasu “established his own alternate dynasty, and built a new capital… Edo (now Tokyo) (82).” Ieyasu did not challenge the emperors, for the shoguns held most of the power. During Ieyasu’s rein he issued a lot of decrees that provided the warrior and lower classes with the expectations and rules they should follow.