Amicus Curiae Case Study
What is Amicus Curiae:
1) Amicus Curiae is Latin which stands for “friend of the court”. A non-party with an interest in the outcome of a pending lawsuit who argues or presents information in support of or against one of the parties to the lawsuit.
2) An amicus curiae brief is a persuasive legal document filed by a person or entity in a case, usually while the case is on appeal, in which it is not a party but has an interest in the outcome—typically the rule of law that would be established by the court in its ruling. Amicus parties try to “help” the court reach its decision by offering facts, analysis, or perspective that the parties to the case have not.
3) One of the best explanation of an amicus as stated by Lord Salmon in the court
…show more content…
Commodity Futures Trading Commission where he rejected the brief on an amicus curiae stating.: After 16 years of reading amicus curiae briefs the vast majority of which have not assisted the judges, I have decided that it would be good to scrutinize these motions in a more careful, fish-eyed, fashion. The vast majority of amicus briefs are filed by allies of litigants and duplicate the arguments made in the litigants’ briefs, in effect, merely extending the length of the litigant’s brief. Such amicus briefs should not be allowed. They are an abuse.”
7) Many amicus curiae brief are a waste of time and money. Very often the court is flooded with short amicus curiae briefs that say little more than “me too” the amicus agrees with one side in the controversy. Other amicus briefs repeat that analysis of one of the parties with slightly varied phraseology. They fail to meet the countervailing arguments, and thus they fail to assist the court in comparing and evaluating competing claims.
8) Some Amicus curiae insist on discussing issues that are far removed from the issues before the court and thus they contribute nothing to the analysis of the
…show more content…
As in other Supreme Court briefs, an amicus brief should be simple, unadorned by rhetorical devices, and undefaced by overstatement or exaggeration. Make the sentences and paragraphs relatively short. Draft the brief with active, not passive, verbs. The goal is ready comprehension. If the reader cannot comprehend the brief on the train on the way to work, it is too complicated. Boil it down. Resist any impulse to resort to purple prose. Likewise, resist the frequent use of adjectives, adverbs, or expressions like "obviously," "plainly," and their kin. Never succumb to the temptation to heap scorn on opposing counsel. Keep a moderate tone in an amicus
North Carolina Civil Summons: A Case Study
537 Words | 3 PagesState Of North Carolina Civil Summons AOC-CV-100 State of North Carolina Civil Summons also serves as a subpoena to the defendant to answer the complaint of the plaintiff in the District or Superior Court Division in the General Court of Justice of the North Carolina State. The summons is served under the G.S. 1A-1, Rules 3, 4 provisions of North Carolina General Statutes. Plaintiff can endorse defendants using the spaces provided in this legal instrument. The defendant can respond within thirty days of serving the summons to the plaintiff, his/her attorney, and to the court by submitting the original answer with the Clerk of Superior Court. Mandatory Arbitration may apply to the hearing and the court provided further orders and directives
Summary Of Gideon Vs. Wainwright
578 Words | 3 PagesMatt Ritchey Mr. McAdam Law and Society 10/12/17 Gideon v. Wainwright Case Summary The Supreme Court case of Gideon v. Wainwright was a landmark case in Supreme Court history. It not only established the right to an attorney, but also a fair trial. The criminal case of Gideon v. Wainwright lasted from 1961 to 1963.
Phillip Clark Pros And Cons
1009 Words | 5 PagesWRITING SAMPLE The sample enclosed is a section of a petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States. The case involved a white-collar federal gambling prosecution of first impression within the Fifth Circuit, United States v. Davis, 690 F.3d 330 (5th Cir. 2012). I represented defendant Phillip Clark throughout the entire federal criminal process in this case including: pretrial, jury trial, sentencing, appeal, oral argument, rehearing, en banc rehearing, petitioning the Supreme Court, and remand for resentencing.
Gertz Vs Welch Case Study
428 Words | 2 PagesBerger states: "The important public policy which underlies this tradition—the right to counsel—would be gravely jeopardized if every lawyer who takes an "unpopular" case, civil or criminal, would automatically become fair game for irresponsible reporters and editors who might, for example, describe the lawyer as a "mob mouthpiece" for representing a client with a serious prior criminal record, or as an "ambulance chaser" for representing a claimant in a personal injury
Pros And Cons Of Airtastic
2736 Words | 11 PagesAn arguable case must be illustrated, indicating clearly their case has grounds and a reasonable chance of
Essay On Gideon V. Cochron
851 Words | 4 PagesThe decision overturned Betts v. Brady, Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black stated that “reason and reflection require us to recognize that in our adversary system of criminal justice, any person hauled into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, cannot be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him.” He further wrote that the “noble ideal” of “fair trials before impartial tribunals in which ever defendant stands equal before the law . . . cannot be realized if
Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Analysis
920 Words | 4 PagesLawyers presenting their arguments face the nine Justices are given a limited amount of time to present, however, justices may interrupt with questions. Abe Fortas, selected to represent Gideon, masterfully answered the justices questions while presenting the important points of his case. After the oral presentation, the justices confer in private discussion and select a judge to write the opinion of the court. For Gideon v. Wainwright Justice Black wrote the opinion and presented the court’s decision to overrule Betts v. Brady, a case he’d dissented on twenty years earlier.
How Did Roger Sherman Contribute To The American Revolution
2494 Words | 10 PagesObscure People of the American Revolution We have all heard of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin. These are the most studied, the most documented people of the American Revolution and a few of our country’s Founding Fathers. These are the famous people that everyone refers to when they are either reciting a quote or making a reference to the American Revolution or our Founding Fathers. We all know that these well documented individuals were well educated in the finest schools and that their families had the wealth to accomplish anything they wished.
Gideon V Wainwright Essay
432 Words | 2 PagesThe history of the modern right to counsel for defendants who cannot afford to pay for counsel or lawyer goes back over a century ago; the Indiana Supreme Court in Webb v. Baird, 6 Ind. 13 (1853), officially recognized the right to counsel for a person accused of a crime. However, this decision was not based on constitutional or statutory law but warranted under “the principles of a civilized society.” Since the case of Webb v. Baird, the courts have immensely extended the right to counsel beyond just appointing an indigent person an attorney. For more than a hundred years, the Right to Counsel Clause was interpreted as simply granting the right to retain a private attorney to a defendant but didn’t mean that a poor criminal defendant had
Nils Christie Essay
773 Words | 4 PagesLawyers also decide what is relevant in court, rather than letting parties decide what they believe to be relevant. Because of this, victims lose participation in their own case. Christie also discusses the types of segmentation and their effects on modern law. I agree with Christie’s views of modern law in regards to reduced participation of parties, the presence of too many specialists, and his view on segmentation. I agree with
Texas Judicial System
1152 Words | 5 Pageslawyers, interest groups, and political litigants…tend to be [the] donors. . .”(288). This has created great concern many people feel that the judge will now be beholden to these lawyers and groups. “The influence of special interest money in judicial campaigns raises important questions about the relationship between the rule of law
Summary Of Gerald Rosenberg's Book 'The Hollow Hope'
710 Words | 3 PagesAlex Frost Values: Law & Society 9/23/2014 The Hollow Hope Introduction and Chapter 1 Gerald Rosenberg begins his book by posing the questions he will attempt to answer for the reader throughout the rest of the text: Under what conditions do courts produce political and social change? And how effective have the courts been in producing social change under such past decisions as Roe v. Wade and Brown v. Board of Education? He then works to define some of the principles and view points 'currently' held about the US Supreme court system.
Texas Judges
1450 Words | 6 Pagesand have practiced law as a lawyer, judge, or some combination there for at least four years. Responsibilities include, original jurisdiction in civil actions over $200 or $500, divorce, title to land, contested elections, and contested probate matters. Original jurisdiction in felony criminal matters. The sensitive matter juvenile and 13 district courts are named criminal district court, some others directed to give preference to certain specialized areas. Although the cases in the District Court are more sensitive and lengthier I still believe this court should be elected.
Comparison Of Plessy Vs. Ferguson And Brown V. Board Of Education
1887 Words | 8 PagesRacial segregation was a hugely common act back then. Many cases related to that occurred. The Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education were two important landmarks cases. The two cases changed many things in their society at that time. Numerous subjects were discussed.
Disadvantages Of Judicial Precedents
702 Words | 3 PagesDifferent judges will have different interpretation of cases; hence, they may bind a single case with various precedents making it more difficult to pass a judgment. In this type of situation even competent judges may find it complicated to decide on the ‘ratio decidendi’. Nevertheless, there are a lot of case laws and deciding which case law best appropriates to a case is not always an easy task, as it is time consuming and very stressful to find the most suitable precedent. Therefore, not only the doctrine of judicial precedent has the disadvantage of being complex, while the judges are discussing which case law to apply to a specific case, justice is at the same time being delayed.
More about Amicus Curiae Case Study
North Carolina Civil Summons: A Case Study
537 Words | 3 PagesSummary Of Gideon Vs. Wainwright
578 Words | 3 PagesPhillip Clark Pros And Cons
1009 Words | 5 PagesGertz Vs Welch Case Study
428 Words | 2 PagesPros And Cons Of Airtastic
2736 Words | 11 PagesEssay On Gideon V. Cochron
851 Words | 4 PagesGideon Vs Wainwright Case Analysis
920 Words | 4 PagesHow Did Roger Sherman Contribute To The American Revolution
2494 Words | 10 PagesGideon V Wainwright Essay
432 Words | 2 PagesNils Christie Essay
773 Words | 4 PagesTexas Judicial System
1152 Words | 5 PagesSummary Of Gerald Rosenberg's Book 'The Hollow Hope'
710 Words | 3 PagesTexas Judges
1450 Words | 6 PagesComparison Of Plessy Vs. Ferguson And Brown V. Board Of Education
1887 Words | 8 PagesDisadvantages Of Judicial Precedents
702 Words | 3 Pages