Conflict resolution is a way for two or more parties to find a peaceful solution to a disagreement among them. In simpler terms it means how you solve conflicts. During this process, the parties in the conflict attempt to resolve their conflicts by actively communicating with one another about their issues with each other. Most disagreements come from miscommunication, poor communication skills, different beliefs, manipulation, and unclear or unfair expectations. You solve these issues by engaging in collective mediation and negotiation with one another in a respectful manner which gets everyones point across while also mutually benefiting everyone at the same time.
Officers must settle uncomfortable and tense situations, build a quick bond
…show more content…
Doing so only sets the police up for failure at some later time. This is a self-defeating cycle and puts the line officers in a no-win situation. They either over-respond against one side or they under-react, doing nothing, both of which inevitably hurt the people they are sworn to protect. If you choose sides, you have to go against that side eventually in order to restore the balance. It is essential if we are to truly and fairly enforce the laws. Neutrality is not a sign of weakness; it is a true sign of strength and selflessness and a belief in the fairness of all our actions. Knuckling to the pressure of choosing one side sends the wrong message to everyone. Once we lose our neutrality it is extremely difficult to get it back, if we ever do, and we begin to placate instead of mediate. If we have to take enforcement actions, those we sided with feel betrayed and those we sided against see opportunities to escalate the situation. Remaining neutral, understanding and adhering to our oath, serving and protecting all the people, consistently and fairly enforcing the laws, community involvement and proper training and leadership are the keys to successful
Leaving many of them not wanting them to be around or not giving them a chance to be friends even when they are not in uniform. Most of the issues are started within the cities where law enforcement may seem a little stricter. When working with one agency such as the highway patrol you see a little more of the conflict that exists between the various agencies. Such as city police and sheriffs, especially in how they all respond to each other and whether they can agree on the same
The conflict may also be resolved due to the interference of another
What is the best way to respond to conflict? People respond to conflict in many different way and there are different ways to handle conflict. The best way to handle conflict is to stay positive. People can best respond to conflict by being positive and fighting the conflict head on. Though this could lead to fighting is is the best way to show feeling towards the topic or conflict.
Human beings are all individually incredibly unique. This uniqueness is apparent in every experience of a person’s life, but it is the cycle of these unique experiences that connects all human beings. This cycle is defined as the human condition. Furthermore, this cycle is a series of inevitable life aspects that makes up a human being; two of the most obvious being growth and conflict. Within the human condition, growth cannot exist without conflict and conflict cannot exist without growth.
Conflict is when there is a serious disagreement or clash amongst individuals and conflict resolution is when there is a process to solve this conflict in a peaceful manner. When there is a conflict that arises in our group we plan to always have a resolution. Some of the ways, we will deal with conflict are as follows: • We will appoint someone who will facilitate all the meetings. This person will call the meeting to order, go over what we discussed in our previous meeting, facilitate the questions and make sure we stay with the task on hand.
In my opinion it is, for many reasons, officers cannot predict how a suspect will act in a confrontation leading up to their arrest. The suspect could become violent in a matter of seconds, leaving the officers with a split-second decision to use deadly force. This decision could be life or death for the police officer. Police officers have just as much right to protect their lives as everyone else. I try to perceive myself as a police officer in a situation where I had to choose to use lethal force or face death at the hands of someone I have never wronged, but only have interaction with due to my job.
Police organizations have been evolving over the years, but still there are so many things that have to be address in order to create a better law enforcement institutions. Police misconduct and police brutality have been the center of many confrontations between police officer and society. It is imperative that police organizations change the police subculture that exist among them that protects any wrongdoing from being disclose in order to promote a more efficient service to society. In the process of doing this assignment I learned how cohesive is the relationship between officers that most of the times protect them when they are acting in a misbehave way. It is really impressive to see how one officer was seen as a traitor in the organization because he decided to report police brutality.
When it comes to policing there is a huge struggle power struggle between individual rights and public order. You want to keep individual rights, but you also want to keep public order while keeping the public safe. It may seem hard to keep the balance between these two, but doing so is of utter importance. Here are some examples of why it can be hard to balance individual rights and public order when dealing with policing.
What is Mediation? Prior to the parties getting involved in a mediation session it is understood that the parties are in agreeance to coming together as a means to promote and to bring forward a resolution. Anything that occurs within the session is understood to be confidential and if a party in any way shape or form feels that they no longer want to continue with the process, they have every right to end everything at that point in time. Mediation is a different yet effective way to resolve problems where the parties bring about their own solution to their problem contrary to going in front of a judge or an arbitrator whom will have full control and decide on behalf of you. Mediation helps the parties involved reach a final solution through a mutual and voluntary agreement, this is exactly what makes mediation a process that should be looked into if the situation permits it.
Without deadly force, they may not return safely home to their families. Officer safety would be at risk if deadly force was not an option. When suspects act in certain manors, examples would be lunging at the officer, disobeying direct commands, or digging around in his or her vehicle while the officer is walking up to the vehicle, this may raise the stress level of the officer and the situation. Police officers are entitled to protect his or her lives when the need calls, just as the rest of us are. “These officers are just defending themselves against being attacked.
Police brutality remains a common yet controversial topic around the world. Police brutality is “the use of excessive and/or unnecessary force by police when dealing with civilians” (thelawdictionary.org). It’s a topic that segregates communities and makes each other their enemy. Specifically, a white officer has been the enemy of the black community. Unfortunately, the tension between police and blacks grew over the past few decades.
There are many pros and cons when it comes to the use of police force. The use of force is strictly a part of the job requirement of protecting and serving our community. It is the everyday battles that force police to make decisions that may seem a bit harsh at times. The use of force is only acceptable under certain circumstances and should only be used when absolutely needed. There are cases when civilians are saved by the use of police force, and there are cases when innocent people are hurt or even killed by the use of police force.
Conflict resolution as a field of study as indicated has formed hypothetical bits of knowledge into the nature and source of conflict and how conflicts can be resolved through peaceful systems to effectuate a dependable settlement. Morton Deutsch, was the first to form and understanding into the helpful results of collaboration as a scholastic enquiry. In his view, various variables like the way of the debate and the objectives every group in a conflict goes for are crucial in deciding the sort of introduction a group would convey to the negotiation table in its endeavor to unravel the conflict (Morton Deucth, 1985, p.24). To him, two essential orientations do exist. These are competitive and cooperative.
Conflict resolution happens often in the workplace that can either drive or disturb employees, supervisors, a team, and an entire organization. When supervisors allow conflict resolution to fester without taking immediate action, it can lead the organization into an unhealthy environment. In this paper, the topic for discussion will analyze various strategies that can be utilized to control and manage conflict resolution in the workplace, and the role of the supervisor during conflict resolution situations. In addition, a discussion will include how the workplace and its customers are impacted by a diverse workforce. Conflict Resolution Conflict in the workplace is inevitable, especially in a diverse workforce where employees possess different approaches to his or her job and come from various backgrounds, who share a common work space within an organization (SHRM, 2015).
These are applied by the procedure to enhance the cause of conflict resolution; f) Mediation is a voluntary type of conflict management. This defines the challengers in an intractable issue, select whether to start or prolong mediation or not, and they keep their command over the result of their issue, with their autonomy to accept or refuse any elements of the procedure or the final contract, g) Mediation performs only on an ad hoc basis. Once completed, a mediator departs the field of the conflict. Third party mediation is not confined to mediation by superpower states, such as the United States or Russia. Mediation efforts by small and medium size powers are sometimes a good option (e.g. the Algerian mediation between the US and Iran regarding the American hostages).